Quantitative MRI for Functional Assessment Following SBRT for Spinal Metastases

July 15, 2025 updated by: Duke University

Quantitative MR Imaging Methods for Functional Assessment Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases

The purpose of this study is to determine if quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) can objectively measure changes in the tumor/vertebral body and adjacent spinal cord following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for painful metastatic spine disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Metastatic spine disease (MSD) can result in considerable morbidity from pain, spinal cord compromise and neurologic disability. Recent developments in image-guidance and immobilization have enabled more accurate target localization, which allows methods of precise high-dose radiation delivery such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT carries potential risks of radiation induced myelopathy (RIM) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging modality that may be able to detect radiation-induced damage in the vertebral body or spinal cord following SBRT. Quantitative MR-based imaging methods may also help to quantify treatment response and help predict subsequent outcomes such as tumor control and VCF risk.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of metastatic cancer with a vertebral body metastasis or contiguous vertebral body metastases for which SBRT is appropriate
  • Age ≥ 18 years of age
  • KPS ≥ 70
  • Life expectancy of at least 3 months
  • No contraindication to undergoing MR imaging
  • Women of childbearing age must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test to meet eligibility per Duke Policy
  • Pre-treatment pain score of at least 1/10 based on the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)
  • Disease located from C1 to S5
  • Subjects with prior radiation to the involved vertebral body are allowed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects unable to undergo MRI (includes non-MRI compatible material or devices and severe claustrophobia)
  • Subjects with prior procedural intervention to the involved vertebral body that would result in artifact (kyphoplasty, screw and/or rod placement); minimally invasive surgery without instrumentation of the involved vertebral body and instrumentation immediately above or below the index lesion is allowed.
  • Subjects with spinal cord compression; minimally invasive "separation" surgery to first resect the epidural component is allowed
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Allergy to standard IV contrast agents used in MRI
  • Subjects with eGFR <30 30 mL/min2 or on dialysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: quantitative MRI at 4 weeks
Device: qMRI with Gadoteridol contrast agent
quantitative MR: MRI uses a magnet and radio waves to make medical images of the body. Gadoteridol is used as a contrast agent. Quantitative MRI involves the use of software to analyze the acquired images.
Other Names:
  • quantitative MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Relative Change in Sequence specific parameters for Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
baseline, 4 wks
Relative Change in Sequence specific parameters for Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
baseline, 4 wks
Relative Change in Sequence specific parameters for Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
baseline, 4 wks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in numeric pain score as measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
Measured from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain
baseline, 4 wks
Change in numeric pain score as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
Measured from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain
baseline, 4 wks
Change in numeric pain score as measured by the EQ5D Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
Measured from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain
baseline, 4 wks
Change in opioid use
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
baseline, 4 wks
Change in quality of life as measured by the Pat Sf36 V2 assessment
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
Pat SF36 V2 is a quality of life survey about physical activity, general health and daily functions measured from excellent/much better/yes, limited a lot/all of the time/not at all, through poor/much worse/no,not limited at all/none of the time/extremely with additional not answered option
baseline, 4 wks
Change in quality of life as measured by the PROMIS assessment
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
PROMIS categories include physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep and pain ranging from never/not at all through always/very much.
baseline, 4 wks
Change in quality of life as measured by the SOSG+ assessment
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks
Questionnaire about physical function, neurological function and pain ranging from never/not at all through always/very much
baseline, 4 wks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Trey Mullikin, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 2, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00103960

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings