Turkish Validity And Reliability Of The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Evaluation (Hine) (Hine)

April 16, 2021 updated by: Hatice Adıgüzel, Sanko University
The high risk of infants are defined as having a negative environmental and biological factor history, where these factors can lead to neuromotor development problems. It is a heterogeneous group of premature babies born under the age of thirty-seven weeks, with a low birth weight term or infants with developmental retardation due to various reasons. Risk factors in preterm infants include perinatal asphyxia, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), broncho pulmonary dysplasia (BPD), hyperbilirubinemia, infection. alcohol syndrome, muscle tone disorders, low birth weight, hydrocephalus and microcephaly. These babies, especially preterm infants with low birth weight, may encounter a neurological sequence such as Cerebral Palsy (CP), epilepsy, hearing and vision loss, mental retardation, language-speech, behavioral problems and learning difficulties. CP is the most common disease of childhood, with the possibility of occurrence in 2-3 / 1000 live births.Today, the effectiveness of various methods has been proven to make early diagnosis of CP. One of these methods is the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Evaluation (HINE).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The diagnosis of CP, which can be observed with high risk infants, is based on the observation of many neurological and clinical signs. The diagnosis usually takes place between 12-24 months. In the past years, before 12-24 months, it was seen as a hidden or silent period that could not be fully defined in terms of CP. However, today this definition has been found invalid because the diagnosis of 'high risk of CP' or CP can be predicted precisely before the corrected 6 months.There are 3 methods with the best predictable validity of determining CP before the corrected 5-month period: Neonatal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (86% -89% sensitivity), Prechtl's Qualitative General Movement Assessment (GMs) (98% sensitivity), Hammersmith Infant Neurological Evaluation (HINE) (90% sensitivity). Various difficulties are encountered in long-term follow-up of infants who are discharged from neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in developing countries. Many of these infants are referred to pediatricians or pediatric neurologists as needed. Others are not routinely monitored. However, in order to encourage more consistent and disciplined early assessments for high-risk infants, the guides applied should be adapted to neonatal follow-up clinics. For this reason, various health professionals working in the field of Pediatrics should be supported in providing objective tests and training materials in order to provide coordination and create a common language in the follow-up process. It is known that the HINE test does not require certification training and whose reliability is valid, does not have a Turkish version. Using proven methods to determine these needs and to direct the necessary professionals is a more important guide for clinicians. In order to meet the needs in this field, the Turkish version of the HINE scale in 6-12 months of infants was adapted and this validity and reliability study was planned.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Şehitkamil
      • Gaziantep, Şehitkamil, Turkey, 27090
        • Sanko University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Infants with high risk of cerebral palsy (CP) with the age of 3-12 months.
  • Infants with healthy peers of high of cerebral palsy infants.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with periventricular hemorage, intracranial hemorage,grade 2, 3, 4, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, stage 3 hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal bilirubin encephalopathy (kernicterius), perinatal stroke, perinatal asphyxia, hydrocephalus
  • Chronic lung disease, respiratory lung disease (RDS), broncho pulmonary dysplasia and babies with long-term o₂ support
  • Gram negative bacterial sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), infantile apnea, preterm babies with cerebral malformation
  • Low Apgar score (3 and below), Preterm babies with intrauterine growth retardation, multiple births (twins, triplets), Premature Retinopathy (ROP)
  • Infants with prolonged severe hypoglycaemia and hypocalcemia
  • Surgical conditions such as diaphragmatic hernia or tracheoesophageal fistula
  • Infants who are small for gestational age (small for gestational age, sga, less than 3rd percentile) or large for gestational age (large for gestational age, LGA, greater than 97th percentile)
  • Infants who received mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours
  • Infants younger than 32 gestational weeks and under 1500 kilograms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with congenitalmal formation (spina bifida, congenital muscular torticollis, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita..vs)
  • Infants diagnosed with metabolic and genetic diseases (down syndrome, spinal muscular atrophy, duchenne muscular dystrophy..vs)
  • Postterm Infants still dependent on intubation and mechanical ventilator at 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Other

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: first day of assessment
magnetic resonnas imaging method is an imaging method that shows the parts of the brain that are damaged without oxygen. Imaging is obtained by sending rays to the brain with sound waves.
first day of assessment
Prechtl's general movements (GMs) analysis
Time Frame: up to 5 months
Gms can identify neurological issues predictive of cerebral palsy and other developmental disabilities.GMs videos around 3 months of age (12-16 weeks corrected age) provide the most predictive information about the likelihood risk of cerebral palsy. Ther isn't maximum or cut off scores.Movements are noted as observed/or not. Also quality of fidgety movements are scored as low or high quality.
up to 5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
prenatal,natal and postnatal risk factors
Time Frame: up to 1 year
These parameter can be the risk of Cerebral Palsy for infants. Infants with periventricular bleeding, intracranial bleeding grade 2, 3, 4, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, stage 3 hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal bilirubin encephalopathy (kernicterius), perinatal stroke, perinatal asphyxia, hydrocephalus.Chronic lung disease, respiratory lung disease (RSD), broncho pulmonary dysplasia and babies with long-term o₂ support Gram negative bacterial sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), preterm babies with cerebral malformation. Low Apgar score (3 and below), Preterm babies with intrauterine growth retardation, multiple births, Premature Retinopathy (ROP). Babies with prolonged severe hypoglycaemia and hypocalcemia. Infants who are small for gestational age or large for gestational age. Infants who received mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Babies younger than 32 gestational weeks and under 1500 kilograms.
up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sanko University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: hatice adıgüzel, PhD cd., Sanko Üniversitesi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SankoUnv

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings