Genetics and Genomics of Aspirin Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (AERD) (AERD)

August 30, 2021 updated by: National Jewish Health
Aspirin Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (AERD) is a relatively homogeneous disease characterized by adult-onset severe asthma, development of non-cancerous growths in the nasal canal (i.e. nasal polyps) and aspirin allergy. The cause of AERD is unknown, although likely results from environmental insults in combination with genetic susceptibility. AERD disease homogeneity increases the possibility of discovering narrowly-defined genetic contributors, and makes it an ideal population to study the genetic and epigenetic changes that cause asthma. Researchers recently discovered that gene expression of epithelial growth and repair (EGR) genes are substantially decreased in bronchial airway epithelial cells of severe asthmatics compared to less severe asthmatics and healthy controls. This new finding indicates that epithelial integrity and related processes may be of primary importance to the development of severe asthma, and potentially the severe asthma subtype, AERD. This finding was later supported in a subsequent lab model, which showed that blocking a central epithelial repair and differentiation gene, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2), decreased healing time of bronchial epithelial cells after injury. Thus, the objective of the proposed study is to determine whether EGR gene are also down-regulated in AERD, a homogeneous severe asthma subtype. As an extension, the researchers will also determine whether genetic mutations and/or epigenetic changes relate to and potentially explain this down-regulation of EGR genes. Specifically, the researchers plan to obtain gene expression of freshly brushed nasal airway epithelial cells of 140 AERD patients, 70 non-aspirin sensitive asthma patients, and 35 healthy controls, noting that nasal epithelial gene expression has recently been shown to mirror lung epithelial changes in asthmatic airways. Swabbing the nasal canal for epithelial cells allows to evaluate airway epithelial cell gene expression non-invasively. Our experimental design contrasts AERD gene expression profiles against healthy controls, and determines whether EGR genes are depressed in AERD relative to health controls. As a corollary, the researchers look to discover an AERD-specific gene expression profile which may one-day aid in diagnosis and expand current knowledge of disease mechanisms. As an extension, the researchers will correlate gene expression changes, specifically any finding of down-regulated EGR genes, with methylation changes (i.e. epigenetic changes) and genetic mutations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
245

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80206
        • National Jewish Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

AERD participants, a subtype of severe asthma characterized by inflammation of the nasal cavity, development of non-cancerous growths, and an allergy to aspirin; 35 healthy control participants. Populations will be recruited from clinic visits or clinical research inquiries, all volunteers.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physician diagnosis of asthma
  • Physician diagnosis of chronic nasal disease featuring nasal polyps
  • Sensitivity to aspirin verified by an aspirin provocative challenge in clinic
  • Healthy control participant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active smoking
  • Pregnancy
  • History of greater than or equal to 10 pack-years of smoking
  • Any significant comorbid conditions that could inadvertently interfere with study results
  • Conditions that require bursts of oral corticosteroids
  • Other significant lung diseases
  • Other disease in the view of the investigator prohibits participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
AERD participants
Participants with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease. Adults with aspirin allergy, nasal polyps and adult-onset severe asthma.
Healthy controls
Healthy participants that do not have asthma.
Non-aspirin sensitive asthma participants
Participants with asthma, but that do not have a sensitivity to aspirin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of EGR related gene expression in AERD
Time Frame: Through study completion, 3 years
Researchers will obtain global gene expression of freshly brushed nasal airway epithelial cells of AERD patients, non-aspirin sensitive asthma patients, and healthy patients using nasal swab samples and running RNAseq on the collected cells. Researchers will contrast AERD gene profiles against non-aspirin sensitive asthma patients and healthy patients and determine whether down-regulation of EGR genes is found in AERD.
Through study completion, 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relation of EGR gene expression to epigenetic gene methylation
Time Frame: Through study completion, 3 years
To determine whether whole genome methylation profiling is altered in association with down-regulated EGR genes. Researchers will obtain complementary whole-genome methylation profiles of the study participants and will evaluate whether down-regulated EGR genes in AERD patients are associated with methylation differences by a composite analysis integrating expression and epigenetic data. MethylMix R software program will be used to identify methylation changes associated with gene expression changes. MethylMix integrates DNA methylation from normal and disease samples with matched gene expression. In summary, MethylMix defines hyper and hypomethylated genes by comparing methylation values of disease tissue vs. normal.
Through study completion, 3 years
Influence of Genetic variation on EGR related gene expression
Time Frame: Through study completion, 3 years
To determine whether genetic mutations associate with down-regulated EGR gene expression in AERD patients. We will obtain genotypes on these same study participants and evaluate whether down-regulated EGR genes are associated with mutations by a composite analysis integrating expression and genotypes. The Affymetrix genotyping workflow consists of 4 steps; first 3 steps use a set of stand-alone software packages, and the 4th step using R package SNPolisher. Sample QC will be evaluated by Dish-QC statistic, retaining samples with default Dish-QC > 82%. Genotyped samples with a call rate lower than default value of 97% will be excluded. Platewise QC will be evaluated by manually calculating 'Plate Pass Rate' and 'Average Plate Call Rate' statistics, with default cutoff values of 95 and 99%. Genotyping step will be rerun for samples passing quality criteria. SNPolisher will evaluate quality of the signal and classify each SNP probe.
Through study completion, 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Jewish Health

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The Scripps Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HS-3200sIRB

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings