Initial Pain Management in Pediatric Pancreatitis: Opioid vs. Non-Opioid (PATIENCE)

January 6, 2026 updated by: Amit Grover, Boston Children's Hospital
This will be a phase 2, single-center, unblinded randomized controlled pilot trial of two arms comparing opioid-sparing analgesia to the current Boston Children's Hospital institutional practice which has been reported to predominantly include administration of opioids as a first-line analgesic to pediatric patients who present to the emergency department with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP). This is a pilot trial for which many outcomes have not previously been studied in the pediatric AP population. The focus of this investigation will be to investigate the magnitude and variability of effect sizes for designing a future multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common pancreatic disease of childhood with an increasing incidence estimated at 13.2 cases in 100,000 children per year. Given the dearth of pediatric literature, most pediatric providers often rely on diagnostic, prognostic and treatment guidelines that have been derived from adults. This is problematic because adult therapeutic guidelines fail to consider the unique age-related responses and requirements of childhood. Pain management is one of the cornerstones in the treatment of pancreatitis, with abdominal pain being the most common presenting symptom of AP. Currently, there are no data on optimal pain management in pediatric AP. Older guidelines suggest that the "use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is advantageous" as it allows the patient to self-administer opioids and strike a balance between analgesia and side effects. This requires cognitive maturity to understand how to use PCA and poses challenges for younger children, particularly infants and toddlers, as well as pediatric patients with developmental delay. It is particularly concerning that greater than 94% of surveyed pediatric practitioners would use morphine or related opioids as a first-line therapy in children with AP especially when there have been no studies examining the benefits/risks of opioid vs non-opioid analgesics or opioid-sparing therapies in pediatric AP. Furthermore, we recently reported a retrospective analysis demonstrating that opioids are prescribed far more frequently either alone or in combination with non-opioids (70%) than non-opioid alternatives alone (30%). Amongst all types of analgesia prescribed to children who presented to the BCH emergency department (ED) with acute pancreatitis, morphine was the most common. Further research in this area is imperative, particularly given the recent opioid epidemic. From a pediatric perspective, it has been demonstrated that adolescents are amongst those at risk for opioid abuse, thus there is an urgent need to determine whether opioids are necessary for the management of pain in this vulnerable population with AP.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
23

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 21 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who present to the ED and are admitted to BCH with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis or an acute bout of chronic pancreatitis based on INSPPIRE14 Criteria (Appendix 1)
  2. Age ≤21 years
  3. Patient weight ≥8 kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to morphine (and hydromorphone) or aspirin/NSAID
  2. History of renal or hepatic insufficiency
  3. History of peptic ulceration
  4. History of bleeding diathesis
  5. Pregnant females
  6. Patients who have a documented history of substance abuse disorder or those who use opioids chronically
  7. Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
  8. Patients who received intravenous opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in transit or during their ED admission.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental Arm - Ketorolac (Opioid-Sparing)
Patients assigned to this arm of the study will follow the standardized step-up approach to pain management per the hospital Evidenced Based Guideline (EBG). If analgesia is not obtained with first-line medications such as acetaminophen, the patient will be given the NSAID ketorolac intravenously every 6 hours at the standard weight-based dose throughout hospitalization. If the patient experiences continued pain, they (or their guardian/ caregiver) may request a rescue medication in the form of low-dose morphine (or an alternative opioid if allergic to morphine) at 0.025 mg/kg/dose every 4 hours.
Drug: Ketorolac
Subjects will be randomized to either receive opioid (standard of care) or opioid-sparing analgesia.
Other Names:
  • Toradol
Active Comparator: Control Arm - Conventional Treatment/Standard of Hospital Care
Patients assigned to this arm of the study will be treated per institutional policy and procedural care as dictated by established hospital order sets and at the discretion of the provider. This may involve the step-up approach per the hospital EBG utilizing acetaminophen or ibuprofen as first-line agents; however, it remains at the discretion of the treating provider. The current standard of care for children presenting to the ED is based on prescribing order sets within the electronic medical record (EMR). Physicians in the BCH emergency department choose in an intermittently-prescribed manner, standard doses of analgesia including acetaminophen (Tylenol) or ibuprofen per the hospital EBG, as well as opioids (morphine, hydromorphone).
Drug: Opioid
Subjects will be randomized to either receive opioid (standard of care) or opioid-sparing analgesia
Other Names:
  • Morphine, hydromorphone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy: amount of opioid analgesia (mg/kg/hr) from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA
Time Frame: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA
The primary endpoint for efficacy is the amount of opioid analgesia (mg/kg/hr) from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA.
time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety: number of hours from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA
Time Frame: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA
The secondary endpoint for safety is defined as the total number of incident adverse events, grade 2 or higher, from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA.
time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA
Length of stay
Time Frame: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA
The secondary endpoint for length of stay is defined as the number of hours from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA.
time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA
Time to initiation of oral or enteral diet
Time Frame: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA
The secondary endpoint for time to initiation of oral or enteral diet is defined as the number of hours from the time of enrollment until first oral or enteral intake. The number of hours will be expressed to two decimal places to account for fractions of an hour.
time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA
Predefined Feasibility Outcomes to Assess Trial Success
Time Frame: duration of trial, approximately 1 year from the start of enrollment
The secondary endpoint for feasibility is defined as (1) ≥80% of eligible patients approached for consent during the trial, and (2) ≥20% of eligible patients randomized into the trial.
duration of trial, approximately 1 year from the start of enrollment
Pain resolution: pain scores
Time Frame: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA
To compare pain resolution from time of enrollment throughout hospital stay by comparing pain scores in patients receiving opioid-sparing therapies to those receiving standard of care opioid analgesics.
time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Children's Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The National Pancreas Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Amit Grover, MB BCh BAO, Boston Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 24, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P00034168

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings