The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Quality of Recovery and Postoperative Analgesia After Inguinal Hernia Repair

April 15, 2023 updated by: Başak Altıparmak

The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Quality of Recovery and Postoperative Analgesia of Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: Randomized, Controlled, Double Blinded Trial

Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is one of the most commonly performed operations in general surgery practice. Different pharmacological approaches and interfascial plane blocks are used to control postoperative pain. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively new interfascial plane block which was reported to be effective in different types of surgeries. In this study, the primary aim is to assess the effect of ESP on recovery of patients following open IHR surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is one of the most commonly performed operations in general surgery practice. Unfortunately, 40% of the patients experience moderate-to-severe acute pain in the early period. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively new interfascial plane block which was described in 2016. In this prospective, controlled trial, the primary hypothesis is that ultrasound-guided unilateral ESP block will provide an increase in the quality of recovery-15 scores which will be assessed at the postoperative 24th hour following open IHR surgery. The secondary hypothesis is that ESP block will reduce postoperative pain scores, need for rescue analgesia and time to first mobilization.The study will be conducted as a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial in a university hospital. Patients scheduled for an elective unilateral open IHR under spinal anesthesia, will be screened for enrollment to the study. At the end of the operation, patients will be randomized to receive a unilateral ESP block with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine or 30 ml of normal saline at the level of T12 vertebrae. A blinded anesthesiologist will collect outcome measures in the postoperative period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
73

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Muğla, Turkey, 48000
        • Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II
  • Elective unilateral open inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulation disorder
  • Known allergy to study drugs
  • Chronic opioid use
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Use of pain medications
  • Psychologic disorder or inability to cooperate Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) test
  • Preoperative pain related to inguinal hernia NRS > 4/10

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ESP Group
At the end of the skin closure, patients will be positioned in lateral decubitis and unilateral ESP block will be performed with single injection of 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine at the level of T12 transverse process. All patients will receive intravenous (iv) paracetamol 1000 mg at the arrival to the recovery room. The dosage will be repeated at every 8-hours interval.
Procedure: ESP Block
At the end of the skin closure, patients will be positioned in lateral decubitis with the involved site lying superiorly. A convex ultrasound probe will be placed over the transverse process of T12 vertebra in longitudinal axis and an 80- mm 21-gauge needle will be inserted in the plane view under aseptic conditions. A unilateral ESP block will be performed with 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine into the interfascial plane between erector spinae muscle and T12 transverse process
Other: Global Quality of Recovery-15 score
Global Quality of Recovery-15 score (QoR-15) will be recorded prior to the surgery and at the postoperative 24th hour.
Other: Standard Pain Followup and Monitorization
Numeric Rating Scale score will be recorded at the 1.-2.-4.-6.-8.-12.-24.hours. If Numerical Rating Scale score will be equal to or over 4, iv dexketoprofen 50 mg will be applied as rescue analgesic. Numerical Rating Scale scores, the rescue analgesic need and the time for first mobilization of the patient will be recorded and kept in a statistical evaluation.
Sham Comparator: Control Group
At the end of the skin closure, patients will be positioned in lateral decubitis and unilateral ESP block will be performed with single injection of 30 ml normal saline at the level of T12 transverse process. All patients will receive intravenous (iv) paracetamol 1000 mg at the arrival to the recovery room. The dosage will be repeated at every 8-hours interval.
Procedure: ESP Block
At the end of the skin closure, patients will be positioned in lateral decubitis with the involved site lying superiorly. A convex ultrasound probe will be placed over the transverse process of T12 vertebra in longitudinal axis and an 80- mm 21-gauge needle will be inserted in the plane view under aseptic conditions. A unilateral ESP block will be performed with 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine into the interfascial plane between erector spinae muscle and T12 transverse process
Other: Global Quality of Recovery-15 score
Global Quality of Recovery-15 score (QoR-15) will be recorded prior to the surgery and at the postoperative 24th hour.
Other: Standard Pain Followup and Monitorization
Numeric Rating Scale score will be recorded at the 1.-2.-4.-6.-8.-12.-24.hours. If Numerical Rating Scale score will be equal to or over 4, iv dexketoprofen 50 mg will be applied as rescue analgesic. Numerical Rating Scale scores, the rescue analgesic need and the time for first mobilization of the patient will be recorded and kept in a statistical evaluation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Quality of Recovery-15 score
Time Frame: Postoperative 24th hour
Global quality of recovery (QoR) score which will be measured by using 15-item QoR-15 questionnaire. This questionnaire covers a total of 15 questions under five clinical dimensions of health; physical comfort (five-item), emotional status (four-item), psychological support (two-item), physical independence (two-item) and pain (two-item)
Postoperative 24th hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 24 hours
A blinded anesthesiologist will assess postoperative pain of the patients during resting and movement at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 12th and 24th hours by using 11-point Numerical Rating Scale which ranges from '0' (means no pain) to '10' (means worst pain imaginable).
24 hours
Rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
If Numerical Rating Scale score of the patient is equal to or over 4, iv dexketoprofen 50 mg will be applied as rescue analgesic. Total rescue analgesia need will be recorded.
24 hours
Mobilization time
Time Frame: 24 hours
If the patient walks with or without help, it will be accepted as the first mobilization. The motor block duration and time for the first mobilization of the patient will be recorded.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Başak Altıparmak

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Başak Altıparmak, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Medical Faculty

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 7, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20-II

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

via email

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings