Verify if Amelogenins Had Some Benefits in Improving Lower 2nd Molar Periodontal Healing After 3rd Molar Extraction

March 17, 2020 updated by: Pippi Roberto, University of Roma La Sapienza

Usefulness of Amelogenins in the Treatment of Periodontal Defects on the Distal Surface of the Lower Second Molar After Adjacent Third Molar Extraction: a Pilot Study

Background: Prevention of periodontal defects after the extraction of lower third molars remains a challenge. Various methods have been proposed in the literature, but there are no studies which evaluated the effectiveness of amelogenins.

Methods: A single-blind split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was performed on 5 patients to verify if amelogenins had some benefits in improving lower second molar periodontal healing after adjacent third molar extraction. A PPD ≥ 8 mm associated with a radiographic bone defect of at least 5 mm were the main inclusion criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 27 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged < 27, for which the extraction of both lower third molars was indicated
  • Bilateral total (bone or osteo-mucosal) third molar impaction
  • Bilateral bone defect ≥ 5mm distal to the lower second molars, evaluated on pre- operative periapical radiographs performed with Rinn's film holders
  • PPD ≥ 8mm distal to the second lower molars, in at least one of the following probing sites: buccal, disto-buccal, disto-central, disto-lingual
  • Intra-operative integrity of both third molar buccal and lingual alveolar cortices

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking habit
  • Systemic disorders with serious immunologic impairment
  • Taking cortisone or other drugs that might interfere with healing process
  • Allergy to penicillins
  • Previous periodontal treatment
  • Less than 2 mm of adherent gingiva at second molar level
  • Second molars with a prosthetic crown
  • Previous endodontic treatment of second molars
  • Furcation involvement of the second molars

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: amelogenins group
The study involved enrolling 5 periodontitis free patients, to which the extraction of both lower third molars was prescribed. A bone defect at the distal surface of the second molar ≥ 5 mm, had to be present on the intraoral periapical radiography, bilaterally. Amelogenins effect was evaluated by applying them only in the test site and comparing healing results with those obtained on the contra-lateral site
amelogenins applied on the distal surface of the lower second molar after adjacent third molar extraction
Other Names:
  • third molar surgery
Placebo Comparator: placebo group
The study involved enrolling 5 periodontitis free patients, to which the extraction of both lower third molars was prescribed. A bone defect at the distal surface of the second molar ≥ 5 mm, had to be present on the intraoral periapical radiography, bilaterally. In this group (control site) the conventional treatment was performed, and healing was ensured only by the simple blood clot
placebo applied on the distal surface of the lower second molar after adjacent third molar extraction
Other Names:
  • third molar surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CAL (Clinical attachment level) pre operative
Time Frame: baseline, pre-surgery
baseline, pre-surgery
CAL (Clinical attachment level) post operative
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
7 days after surgery
CAL (Clinical attachment level) 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery.
3 months after surgery.
CAL (Clinical attachment level) 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery.
12 months after surgery.
PPD (Periodontal probing dept) pre operative
Time Frame: baseline, pre-surgery
baseline, pre-surgery
PPD (Periodontal probing dept) post operative
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
7 days after surgery
PPD (Periodontal probing dept) 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery.
3 months after surgery.
PPD (Periodontal probing dept) 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery.
12 months after surgery.
REC (recession) pre operative
Time Frame: baseline, pre-surgery
baseline, pre-surgery
REC (recession) post operative
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
7 days after surgery
REC (recession) 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery.
3 months after surgery.
REC (recession) 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery.
12 months after surgery.
Radiographic bone Level pre operative
Time Frame: An endoral x-ray was taken baseline, pre-surgery
An endoral x-ray was taken baseline, pre-surgery
Radiographic bone Level post operative
Time Frame: An endoral x-ray was taken 7 days after surgery
An endoral x-ray was taken 7 days after surgery
Radiographic bone Level 3 months
Time Frame: An endoral x-ray was taken 3 months after surgery.
An endoral x-ray was taken 3 months after surgery.
Radiographic bone Level 12 months
Time Frame: An endoral x-ray was taken 12 months after surgery.
An endoral x-ray was taken 12 months after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events pre operative
Time Frame: pre-operative
the occurrence of adverse events after the use of amelogenins.
pre-operative
Adverse Events post operative
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
the occurrence of adverse events after the use of amelogenins.
7 days after surgery
Adverse Events 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery.
the occurrence of adverse events after the use of amelogenins.
3 months after surgery.
Adverse Events 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery.
the occurrence of adverse events after the use of amelogenins.
12 months after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roberto Pippi, MDDS, Sapienza University of Rome

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3522/13.02.2015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attachment Loss, Periodontal

Search Similar Trials