Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Post-alectinib Treatment Patterns

May 16, 2024 updated by: Pfizer

Patient Profiles and Treatment Patterns Among ALK-positive NSCLC Patients Treated With Alectinib

This study aims to understand patient profiles, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes among ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with alectinib, and post-alectinib treatment patterns and outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
161

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10017
        • Pfizer Inc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of patients with a diagnosis of NSCLC receiving alectinib.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a documented diagnosis of NSCLC.
  2. Patients ≥ 18 years of age at initial recorded diagnosis of NSCLC.
  3. Patients who received treatment with alectinib during the study identification period, including those who initiated alectinib prior (index date-1) to the start of the study identification period.
  4. During the study observation period, patients observed with at least 2 visits after the index date-1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Receipt of treatment indicated for another primary cancer or diagnosis of another primary cancer (with the exception of non-melanotic skin cancer), within 5 years of index date-1 will be excluded.
  2. Patients enrolled in clinical trials prior to receiving alectinib during the study ID period (index date-1), will be included and flagged in the analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC
Drug: Alectinib
Observational treatment based on physician choice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Classified According to Treatments Received for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Positive-non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ALK + NSCLC) in Sequence
Time Frame: During the inclusion period from 01-Jun-2017 to 31-Aug-2020 (maximum up to 39 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
Number of participants classified according to ALK-TKI treatment patterns or sequencing were reported in this outcome measure.
During the inclusion period from 01-Jun-2017 to 31-Aug-2020 (maximum up to 39 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
Number of Participants Classified According to Reason for Alectinib Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: From initiation of index treatment to discontinuation from 01-Jun-2017 to 31-Aug-2021 (maximum up to 51 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
Number of participants classified according to reason for Alectinib treatment discontinuation were reported in this outcome measure. One participant could have more than one reason for discontinuation.
From initiation of index treatment to discontinuation from 01-Jun-2017 to 31-Aug-2021 (maximum up to 51 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
Duration of Therapy (DOT)
Time Frame: Alectinib or post-alectinib treatment initiation till its discontinuation or censoring date, during study observation period (maximum up to 51 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
DOT was defined as duration of time between alectinib or post-alectinib treatment initiation and discontinuation as documented in the iKM EHR database. Participants who did not have evidence of discontinuation, starting new therapy, or whose last prescription date was less than (<) 30 days from the end of the study period, were censored at last visit date or end of study period.
Alectinib or post-alectinib treatment initiation till its discontinuation or censoring date, during study observation period (maximum up to 51 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From start of treatment until date of death or censoring date, during study observation period (maximum up to 51 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
OS was defined as the interval between treatment and the date of death (any cause) as documented in the iKM EHR database. Participants who did not die within the study observation period were censored on the study end date or the last visit date available in the dataset, whichever occurred first.
From start of treatment until date of death or censoring date, during study observation period (maximum up to 51 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From initiation of index treatment to date of progression or death due to any cause or censoring date, during study observation period (maximum up to 51 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study
PFS was measured from the initiation of the treatment to the date of progression (documented by provider as disease has progressed or worsening of disease) or date of death due to any cause, censoring participants who were still alive at the end of the study observation period and did not progress at the last visit date.
From initiation of index treatment to date of progression or death due to any cause or censoring date, during study observation period (maximum up to 51 months); eligible data was studied during approximately 31 months of this retrospective study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: June 2017 to December 2019
June 2017 to December 2019
Treatment discontinuation
Time Frame: June 2017 to December 2019
June 2017 to December 2019
Progression free survival
Time Frame: June 2017 to December 2019
June 2017 to December 2019

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B7461031

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings