Mordified Restoration of Tensor Veli Palatini in Cleft Palate Repair
The Possible Effect of Modified Restoration of Tensor Veli Palatini on Audiological and Otological Outcome in Cleft Palate Repair.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of cleft palate.
- Primary palate repair.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe general disease
- Confirmed hereditary hearing loss or neuropathic hearing loss.
- Received any kind of audiological or otological therapy before.
- Patients and/or his/her don't want to continue the clinical trial.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Langerbeck's repair
Langerbeck's repair of cleft palate,without specific restoration of levator veli palatini or tensor veli palatini.
Incisions along the margins of the cleft at the junction of oral and nasal mucosa.
Lateral relaxing incisions were performed and the mucoperiosteal flap of hard palate were elevated on both sides except the ones with only soft palate cleft.
The anterior end of the mucoperiosteal flap may be cut off for the purpose of tension relieving and would be resutured to the anterior area during closing.
In the soft palate, the division was made between the oral mucous layer and the palatal musculature layer.
Hamulus were broken for closing the cleft without tension.
Closing was done by two seperated layers, one layer of nasal mucosa-palatal muscle, and one layer of oral mucosa.
|
restoration of tensor veli palatini for the purpose of the muscle function recovery.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: restoration of levator veli palatini
The incision was made similar to Langerbeck's repair.
During disection, the levator veli palatini was identified after the elevation of flap.
The levator veli palatini was separate from the oral and nasal mucosa.
During closing, the anterior end of levator veli palatini was rotated towards the midline and the two muscle bundle from the two sides were sutured in the midline.
In this process, the tensor veli palatini was not intentionally identified or dissected.
|
restoration of tensor veli palatini for the purpose of the muscle function recovery.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: mordified restoration of tensor veli palatini
Incision was made similar to Langerbeck's repair.
During disection, the tensor veli palatini was identified after flap elevation.
Its tendinous fibers was released from but still connected to the pterygoid process without breaking the hamulus or cutting off the tendinous fibers.
If the tension is too strong during suturing, the tensor tendon could be partly dissected laterally meanwhile be kept continuity medially so that the tensor veli palatini could be rotated more medially.
The levator veli palatini, tensor veli palatini, together with the palatine aponeurosis and the nasal mucosa from two sides were sutured in the middle line.
The tensor veli palatini may not be jointed to the contralateral one directly.
|
restoration of tensor veli palatini for the purpose of the muscle function recovery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hearing level
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
Auditory brainstem response was tested in all three groups after surgery.
The air conductive hearing threshold was used to assess the hearing level.
|
3 months after surgery
|
|
The otological status of middle ear
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
226 tympanometry was tested in all three groups after surgery.
The results of 226 Hz tympanometry were classified based on Liden/Jerger classification.
Four classes of tympanometry results were included.
|
3 months after surgery
|
|
Hearing level
Time Frame: 0 to 3 months before surgery
|
Auditory brainstem response was tested in all three groups before surgery.
The air conductive hearing threshold was used to assess the hearing level.
|
0 to 3 months before surgery
|
|
The otological status of middle ear
Time Frame: 0 to 3 months before surgery
|
226 tympanometry was tested in all three groups before surgery.
The results of 226 Hz tympanometry were classified based on Liden/Jerger classification.
Four classes of tympanometry results were included.
|
0 to 3 months before surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- S-K1145
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.