Mordified Restoration of Tensor Veli Palatini in Cleft Palate Repair

April 26, 2020 updated by: Lian Zhou, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

The Possible Effect of Modified Restoration of Tensor Veli Palatini on Audiological and Otological Outcome in Cleft Palate Repair.

to study the benefical audiological and/or otological effect by mordified restoration of tensor veli palatini in cleft palate repair compared to traditional Langenbeck's repair and merely levator veli palatini restoration.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

71 patients with cleft palate received surgery were divided into 3 groups. Group 1: patients who received Langenbeck surgery without specific restoration of levator veli palatini or tensor veli palatini. Group 2: patients who received palate surgery with special levator veli palatini restoration. Group 3: patients who received palate surgery with modified tensor veli palatini restoration. The conductive auditory brainstem response and 226 Hz tympanometry were used to test the audiological and otological status of the three groups. Preoperative and postoperative results were compared intragroup and intergroup.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 5 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of cleft palate.
  • Primary palate repair.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe general disease
  • Confirmed hereditary hearing loss or neuropathic hearing loss.
  • Received any kind of audiological or otological therapy before.
  • Patients and/or his/her don't want to continue the clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Langerbeck's repair
Langerbeck's repair of cleft palate,without specific restoration of levator veli palatini or tensor veli palatini. Incisions along the margins of the cleft at the junction of oral and nasal mucosa. Lateral relaxing incisions were performed and the mucoperiosteal flap of hard palate were elevated on both sides except the ones with only soft palate cleft. The anterior end of the mucoperiosteal flap may be cut off for the purpose of tension relieving and would be resutured to the anterior area during closing. In the soft palate, the division was made between the oral mucous layer and the palatal musculature layer. Hamulus were broken for closing the cleft without tension. Closing was done by two seperated layers, one layer of nasal mucosa-palatal muscle, and one layer of oral mucosa.
restoration of tensor veli palatini for the purpose of the muscle function recovery.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: restoration of levator veli palatini
The incision was made similar to Langerbeck's repair. During disection, the levator veli palatini was identified after the elevation of flap. The levator veli palatini was separate from the oral and nasal mucosa. During closing, the anterior end of levator veli palatini was rotated towards the midline and the two muscle bundle from the two sides were sutured in the midline. In this process, the tensor veli palatini was not intentionally identified or dissected.
restoration of tensor veli palatini for the purpose of the muscle function recovery.
EXPERIMENTAL: mordified restoration of tensor veli palatini
Incision was made similar to Langerbeck's repair. During disection, the tensor veli palatini was identified after flap elevation. Its tendinous fibers was released from but still connected to the pterygoid process without breaking the hamulus or cutting off the tendinous fibers. If the tension is too strong during suturing, the tensor tendon could be partly dissected laterally meanwhile be kept continuity medially so that the tensor veli palatini could be rotated more medially. The levator veli palatini, tensor veli palatini, together with the palatine aponeurosis and the nasal mucosa from two sides were sutured in the middle line. The tensor veli palatini may not be jointed to the contralateral one directly.
restoration of tensor veli palatini for the purpose of the muscle function recovery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hearing level
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
Auditory brainstem response was tested in all three groups after surgery. The air conductive hearing threshold was used to assess the hearing level.
3 months after surgery
The otological status of middle ear
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
226 tympanometry was tested in all three groups after surgery. The results of 226 Hz tympanometry were classified based on Liden/Jerger classification. Four classes of tympanometry results were included.
3 months after surgery
Hearing level
Time Frame: 0 to 3 months before surgery
Auditory brainstem response was tested in all three groups before surgery. The air conductive hearing threshold was used to assess the hearing level.
0 to 3 months before surgery
The otological status of middle ear
Time Frame: 0 to 3 months before surgery
226 tympanometry was tested in all three groups before surgery. The results of 226 Hz tympanometry were classified based on Liden/Jerger classification. Four classes of tympanometry results were included.
0 to 3 months before surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cleft Palate

Clinical Trials on cleft palate repair

Subscribe