Effects of Pregnancy-associated Hormones on THC Metabolism in Women (PrECEPT)

April 15, 2026 updated by: Nina Isoherranen, University of Washington

Effect of Estradiol and Cortisol on Marinol Metabolism

Cannabis use is prevalent among pregnant women, but the effects of use on both the developing fetus and pregnant woman are unknown. Importantly, drug exposure could be influenced by the impact of pregnancy-associated hormones on the metabolism of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive component of cannabis. The goal of this study is to determine whether cortisol and estradiol - hormones that rise dramatically during pregnancy - increase the clearance of dronabinol (THC) in reproductive age women to simulate the pregnant state. The collected data will then be used to predict the time course and magnitude of changes in THC metabolism in pregnant women, particularly with gradually increasing estradiol and cortisol concentrations that evolve over the course of pregnancy. The overall objective of this study is to better understand the effects of THC use during pregnancy on the health of the pregnant woman and developing fetus.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is approved as a medicinal treatment under the trade name dronabinol but is also a drug of abuse when consumed as part of cannabis products. With the legalization of recreational cannabis use and increased use among pregnant women, there is new urgency to understand the dose-exposure relationship for THC, the mechanisms by which THC is eliminated from the body, and the impact of the hormonal milieu of pregnancy on these mechanisms. As approximately 4% of all pregnant women in the United States use cannabis, there is a critical need for studies evaluating how cannabis metabolism may change during pregnancy leading to altered exposures, pharmacology, and toxicology. Recent studies suggest that cannabis exposure during pregnancy may adversely affect the developing fetus, and administration of cannabis [or dronabinol (THC)] to pregnant women is therefore not ethical. Analysis of THC exposures and effects during pregnancy is significantly hindered by the lack of accurate, quantitative biomarkers of THC exposure and the unreliable self-report of cannabis use. To address these gaps, the current study is designed to 1) characterize the dose-exposure relationship of THC and its major metabolites 11-OH-THC and 11-nor-carboxy-THC in reproductive age women following consumption of dronabinol orally and 2) to determine how THC metabolism is altered by the pregnancy-associated hormones estradiol and cortisol. Existing data show that THC and its major metabolites are cleared by metabolizing enzymes whose activity increases during pregnancy and further has been shown to be induced specifically by estradiol and cortisol, hormones that are markedly increased during pregnancy. Based on these data, we hypothesize that increasing estradiol and cortisol concentrations during pregnancy will increase the clearance of THC and its metabolites, leading to an altered metabolism in pregnant women when compared to non-pregnant individuals. Our clinical study seeks to determine the magnitude of changes in THC pharmacokinetics in healthy female volunteers following exposures to increased estradiol and cortisol. We predict that increased estradiol and cortisol concentrations will result in induction of THC-metabolizing enzymes in the liver and intestine, resulting in increased clearance of THC and its metabolites. The clinical study will provide the foundation for modeling and simulation of THC disposition during human pregnancy. These studies will also provide seminal data to allow modeling of the THC metabolome in human plasma and urine as a function of THC dose and time after consumption, making a significant impact on development of reliable biomarkers of THC exposures in humans.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98125
        • Nina Isoherranen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy, premenopausal women ages 21-45 years old
  • Body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2
  • Regular menstrual periods (monthly, cycle 28-35 days in length)
  • Willingness to use nonhormonal methods of contraception during the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of diabetes or significant cardiac, kidney (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2), gastrointestinal or liver disease
  • History of blood clots or stroke
  • Allergy to dronabinol, synthetic steroids, or any other chemically related drug or steroid
  • Current or recent ingestion (<3 weeks) of any medication or herbal supplement known to be an inducer or inhibitor of CYP2C9, CYP3A4 or UGT. These include some anticoagulants, anti-psychotics, antibiotics, antifungal agents, antidepressants, anti-retroviral agents and herbal supplements (or other over-the-counter medications and supplements). Subjects who are taking any of these prescription drugs will not be asked to discontinue treatment but will be ineligible for study participation. Subjects taking excluded over-the-counter medications and/or supplements will be given the option of discontinuing these for 1 month prior to study participation.
  • Current pregnancy or lactation
  • History of use of illicit drugs or smoking within the last year
  • Any recreational or medicinal use of cannabis or other forms of THC within 3 months
  • Current use of amphetamines, anticholinergic drugs or antidepressants
  • History of seizure disorder or psychiatric illness (mania or schizophrenia; major depression within the past year or >2 episodes lifetime)
  • Current use of live or live attenuated vaccines
  • Personal or family (1st degree relative) history of breast or ovarian cancer
  • Systemic disease (cancer, auto-immune disease, chronic infection, etc)
  • Current or recent (within 6 months) use of hormonal contraceptives
  • History of severe hypertriglyceridemia (>300 mg/dL or history of acute pancreatitis)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (BP>140/90)
  • Allergy to sesame oil
  • Anemia (Hct <34 g/dL)
  • Extensive skin disease (eczema, psoriasis, etc) that would preclude use of transdermal estradiol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Estradiol
1 week treatment with 0.3 mg/24 hr transdermal estradiol
Drug: Dronabinol
2.5 mg PO administered once prior to and once after 1 week of hormone therapy
Other Names:
  • THC, tetrahydrocannabinol
Experimental: Cortisol
1 week treatment with 30 mg hydrocortisone daily, administered in 2 divided doses
Drug: Dronabinol
2.5 mg PO administered once prior to and once after 1 week of hormone therapy
Other Names:
  • THC, tetrahydrocannabinol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dronabinol Exposure
Time Frame: 24 hours
Area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for THC. For AUC calculation the time points of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hrs post dosing were included
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
THC Primary Metabolite Exposure
Time Frame: 24 hours
Area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for 11-OH-THC. For AUC calculation the time points of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hrs post dosing were included
24 hours
THC Secondary Metabolite Exposure
Time Frame: 24 hours
Area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for 11-nor-COOH-THC. For AUC calculation the time points of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hrs post dosing were included
24 hours
Pharmacologic Effects of THC
Time Frame: 12 hours
Visual analog scale ratings of subjective 'high'. The participants self rated how they feel based on the statement from 1-6, where 6 indicates "extremely" or "least false" and 1 is "not at all".
12 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Washington

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nina Isoherranen, PhD, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 14, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00008064
  • 2P01DA032507-06A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings