Conservative Physiotherapy and Acromion Morphology

May 13, 2020 updated by: Begümhan Turhan, Hasan Kalyoncu University

The Short-term Effects of a Conservative Physiotherapy Method in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome and Its Relation to Acromion Morphology

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of conservative physiotherapy in the subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) and its relation to the acromion morphology.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to investigate the short term effects of physiotherapy in SIS patients on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, joint position sense and functionality and its relation to the acromion shape. Fifty patients (26 female, 24 male) with SIS were evaluated in this study. Patiens were divided into 3 groups according to the their acromion morphology. A conservative physiotherapy method was applied to the patients. All patients were evaluated before and 4 weeks after the treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Gaziantep, Turkey, 27000
        • Hasan Kalyoncu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who were diagnosed (clinically and by MRI) with SIS by the physician, at a stage of II-III levels according to Neer's criteria, who were undergoing physiotherapy for the first time and who had not received any treatment from the shoulder region before were included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had a history of fracture in the upper extremity and, surgical operation from any part of the upper extremity, who had acute cervical disc herniation or a neuromuscular disease, receiving a medical therapy for pain relief, less than 80 % participation to sessions were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: flat shape acromion group
a conservative physiotherapy protocol was applied for 4 weeks
Procedure: a conservative physiotherapy protocol
5 minutes of ultrasound (Business Line US 50, Medical Italia, Italy) at a frequency of 1 MHz and intensity of 1.5 watts/cm², 20 minutes of conventional TENS (BTL-5000, UK ) applied to the patients. Then Codman's exercises, shoulder wheel activity, isometric exercises, range of motion exercises, capsular stretching, scapular stabilization exercises, and muscle strengthening exercises were done by patients. After the treatment, cold pack was applied to the shoulder for 10 minutes. The modalities in the treatment program were applied for a total of 20 sessions 5 days per week.
Experimental: curved shape acromion group
a conservative physiotherapy protocol was applied for 4 weeks
Procedure: a conservative physiotherapy protocol
5 minutes of ultrasound (Business Line US 50, Medical Italia, Italy) at a frequency of 1 MHz and intensity of 1.5 watts/cm², 20 minutes of conventional TENS (BTL-5000, UK ) applied to the patients. Then Codman's exercises, shoulder wheel activity, isometric exercises, range of motion exercises, capsular stretching, scapular stabilization exercises, and muscle strengthening exercises were done by patients. After the treatment, cold pack was applied to the shoulder for 10 minutes. The modalities in the treatment program were applied for a total of 20 sessions 5 days per week.
Experimental: hooked shape acromion group
a conservative physiotherapy protocol was applied for 4 weeks
Procedure: a conservative physiotherapy protocol
5 minutes of ultrasound (Business Line US 50, Medical Italia, Italy) at a frequency of 1 MHz and intensity of 1.5 watts/cm², 20 minutes of conventional TENS (BTL-5000, UK ) applied to the patients. Then Codman's exercises, shoulder wheel activity, isometric exercises, range of motion exercises, capsular stretching, scapular stabilization exercises, and muscle strengthening exercises were done by patients. After the treatment, cold pack was applied to the shoulder for 10 minutes. The modalities in the treatment program were applied for a total of 20 sessions 5 days per week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Pain at rest and pain at activity was measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). High score was determined as high level of pain. Visual analog scale (VAS) was ranging from 0 cm (no pain) to 10 cm (worst imaginable pain).
4 weeks
Muscle strength
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Muscle strength tests for shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation were done by a dynamometer (NK-500, AIPU, Anhui, China).
4 weeks
Range of motion
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Goniometric measurements were applied by a universal goniometer to determine the range of motion in terms of flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation directions.
4 weeks
Joint position sense
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The joint position sense was evaluated by a laser pointer. During the test, 90˚ shoulder flexion and 90˚ shoulder abduction movements were evaluated. A laser pointer was fixed with a velcro 5 cm above the elbow. The patient was asked to bring the shoulder to 90˚ flexion while the patient's eyes were open and meanwhile, the measurement was made by the physiotherapist with a goniometer. The patient was asked to fix this position for 10 seconds. The projection of the laser pointer on millimeter paper was marked. The patient repeated this movement 3 times with eyes open and memorized it. The patient returned to the neutral position and closed her eyes then repeated the flexion movement 3 times and the projection of the laser pointer on millimeter paper was marked. The same procedure was performed for shoulder abduction. The deviation between the measurements was calculated.
4 weeks
Painful arc sign
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The patient was asked to perform active shoulder abduction, and the difference between the angle at which the pain first occurred and the angle at which the pain ended was noted during this movement pattern. Measurements were made on the affected shoulder joint by a goniometer
4 weeks
Functionality
Time Frame: 4 weeks
To assess the functional levels of the patients, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was used.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hasan Kalyoncu University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Begumhan Turhan, Hasan Kalyoncu University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019/100

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings