Recovery Learning for Adolescents After Traumatic Experiences (RELATE)

March 16, 2021 updated by: Sarah Halligan, University of Bath

Addressing Elevated PTSD Symptoms in Young People in Care: A Randomised Feasibility Trial Across Social-care and Mental Health Services.

Most children who have been removed from their family home and placed under the care of a Local Authority have been exposed to many frightening experiences, including witnessing violence, not being fed or cared for, or being abused. These experiences can lead to significant emotional difficulties. One such difficulty is posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can involve symptoms like having constant "flashbacks" of scary experiences, and a constant feeling of being in danger. This can have a big effect on children's lives. Yet, it is still not clear how to help young people in care who are experiencing high PTSD symptoms.

One idea the researchers have is to use a group-based online programme which has successfully helped other young people who have been exposed to different kinds of stressful experiences (for example, war). To test whether this programme could help children in care too, the researchers first need to see whether social workers have the time to check in with a child about PTSD symptoms; whether young people and their carers are willing to be involved in a research project which will test out the treatment programme; and whether mental health workers might face any problems when delivering the programme. This project aims to answer these questions.

The researchers will train social workers to complete an 8-question interview with 10-17 year olds in care, which will measure symptoms of PTSD. If the young person is experiencing high symptoms, they will be invited to take part in a research project. If they would like to join the project, children will be randomly selected to take part in the online group programme, or be given care-as-usual. The group programme involves the young person taking part in five weekly meetings held online, where they will learn skills to reduce their distress, and be supported to work through their difficult memories. Their carers will also take part in two online meetings which will teach them how to support their young person.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Experiencing elevated PTSS (using a standard cut-off score of =/> 17 on the 8-item Child Revised Impact of Events Scale; CRIES-8).
  • Living in any care residence (with the exception of those living with a biological parent).
  • Access to appropriate technology to engage in the online sessions and can do so in a quiet and private space.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of psychosis.
  • Current and active serious suicidal ideations.
  • A moderate to severe learning disability.
  • Currently receiving direct therapeutic mental health support.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention Group
Receiving the Teaching Recovery Techniques intervention (delivered online).
Behavioral: Teaching Recovery Techniques
Teaching Recovery Techniques is a 7-session group programme, with 5-sessions for the young person and 2-sessions for the carer. All sessions will be held online. The carer sessions are focused on psychoeducation around trauma and PTSD, as well as skills for supporting a young person through the intervention and with PTSD symptoms more broadly. The young person sessions are primarily focused on skill building and include: psychoeducation and understanding intrusive memories; intrusive images, worries and dreams; arousal, emotions, relaxation and coping; avoidance and triggers; and, memories.
Active Comparator: Care-As-Usual Group
Receiving care-as-usual.
Behavioral: Care as usual
In the care as usual arm, social workers will follow their standard care protocol for young people experiencing psychological distress. A typical response may include a referral to either the specialist local CAMHS or general CAMHS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS)
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-report DSM-5 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom measure. Scores range from 0-60, with greater scores indicating greater symptom severity.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child Revised Impact of Events Scale (CRIES-8)
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-report post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom screening tool. Symptom scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
6 months
Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS-5) Interview Schedule
Time Frame: 6 months
DSM-5 PTSD diagnostic interview. Symptoms range from 0-80, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
6 months
Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA)
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-report measure of young person's perception of their relationship with their carer. Scores range from 28-140, with lower scores indicating greater relationship difficulties.
6 months
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-report and carer-report measure of internalising and externalising difficulties. There are 5 subscales each with scores ranging from 0-10. The total difficulties score is calculated by summing 4 of the sub-scales to give a score between 0-40. The greater the total score, the greater the difficulties experienced.
6 months
Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-report and carer-report depression questionnaire. Scores range from 0-26, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.
6 months
Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D)
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-report measure of health-related quality of life. Scores range from 9-45, with higher scores indicating greater difficulties.
6 months
Parent Trauma Response Questionnaire - support style subscale (PTRQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
Carer-report measure of their support style. Scores range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater difficulties.
6 months
Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (carer report)
Time Frame: 6 months
Carer-report young person PTSD symptom scale. Symptom scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Focus groups and 1:1 semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: 2 months
Qualitative measures carried out with young people, carers and service providers
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Bath

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
King's College London
University of Bristol
University of Edinburgh
University of East Anglia
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 274914

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on Teaching Recovery Techniques

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings