Chatbot Facilitated Education on Child and Adolescent Abuse

August 14, 2025 updated by: Li-Cheng Kao, RN, MSN, Tzu Chi University

The Effectiveness of Chatbot Facilitated Education on Child and Adolescent Abuse for Nurses

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of chatbot-facilitated education (CFE) in assisting nursing personnel to prevent child and adolescent abuse and neglect (CAN). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does applying CFE enhance nurses' intention to report CAN?
  2. Does applying CFE improve nurses' attitudes toward reporting CAN?
  3. Does applying CFE increase nurses' knowledge of CAN?

Researchers will compare CFE to lecture-based teaching to verify if CFE can improve the nurses' competency of CAN.

Participants will:

  1. Attend a CAN course for about 1.5 hours. The experimental group will use CFE, and the control group will only receive lecture-based teaching.
  2. Have the CAN course, comprised of two main subjects: "CAN" and "Nurses' Roles and Functions in CAN".
  3. Receive the learning effect assessment at three different time points: before the course, one week after, and four weeks after.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Based on the rigor of the study and the anticipated benefits to the participants, we will:

  1. Commence participant enrollment only after the protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation.
  2. Conduct a minimum of four courses until the participant group reaches full capacity.
  3. Ensure that participants are not informed about the specific interventions of the course at the time of their enrollment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hualien County
      • Hualien City, Hualien County, Taiwan, 970374
        • Tzu Chi University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Nurses who

  1. work in Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital
  2. finish the probationary period, directly do the practical care
  3. want to participate and sign the consent

Exclusion Criteria:

The nurses will be excluded if they are in an administrative position or withdraw the protocol for any reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chatbot-facilitated education Group
The participants will receive a lecture on the CAN course with assistance from a chatbot. The instructor will pose questions to the participants, who will respond using the chatbot.
The experimental group will use "chatbot" to facilitate teaching.
Active Comparator: Lecture-based teaching Group
The participants will only receive a lecture on the CAN course.
The control group only receives lecture-based teaching.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intention to Report Child and Adolescent Abuse and Neglect
Time Frame: Pre-test (before the course), Post-test 1 (one week after), Post-test 2(four weeks after).
This subscale is part of the Child and Adolescent Abuse and Neglect (CAN) Competency Assessment. It comprises eight simulated child abuse scenarios, with participants rating their intention to report each case on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no intention to report) to 10 (definite intention to report). The total possible score is 80, with higher scores indicating a stronger and more consistent intention to report suspected CAN cases.
Pre-test (before the course), Post-test 1 (one week after), Post-test 2(four weeks after).
Attitude Toward Reporting Child and Adolescent Abuse and Neglect
Time Frame: Pre-test (before the course), Post-test 1 (one week after), Post-test 2(four weeks after).
This subscale is part of the Child and Adolescent Abuse and Neglect (CAN) Competency Assessment and consists of three sections: five items on attitudes toward child discipline, six items on perceptions of abusive parents, and seven items on professional responsibility in reporting child abuse, totaling 18 items. Participants rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The maximum possible score is 108. Higher scores reflect more negative attitudes toward physical discipline, lower tolerance for abusive behavior by parents, and stronger endorsement of professional responsibility in reporting suspected child abuse.
Pre-test (before the course), Post-test 1 (one week after), Post-test 2(four weeks after).
Knowledge About Child and Adolescent Abuse and Neglect
Time Frame: Pre-test (before the course), Post-test 1 (one week after), Post-test 2(four weeks after).
This subscale is part of the Child and Adolescent Abuse and Neglect (CAN) Competency Assessment and includes 13 true-false items. Participants are instructed to respond with "true," "false," or "don't know" for each statement. Correct responses receive one point, while incorrect or "don't know" responses receive zero. The total possible score is 13, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of CAN and its relevant legal framework.
Pre-test (before the course), Post-test 1 (one week after), Post-test 2(four weeks after).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mei-Lin Hsieh, Tzu Chi University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Our study won't share the IPD with others. It has been written on the participants' consent.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Abuse

Clinical Trials on lecture-based teaching

Subscribe