Michigan Alcohol Improvement Network- Alcohol Reduction and Treatment Trial (MAIN-ART)

August 7, 2023 updated by: Jessica Mellinger, University of Michigan
The purpose of the study is to determine if providing participants with alcohol-related liver disease with tailored alcohol use treatment options is feasible and acceptable in order to increase their engagement with treatment and reduce alcohol use. This is an important area to study to help create ways to increase participants' knowledge about different treatment options as well as increase likelihood of seeking and participating in alcohol use disorder treatments.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • The University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled at University of Michigan general hepatology clinics or inpatient wards
  • Documented diagnosis of alcohol-associated cirrhosis or alcoholic hepatitis or alcohol-related liver disease of any stage
  • Drinking of any amount of alcohol within the 6 months prior to recruitment
  • No alcohol use treatment within the past 1 month
  • Access to a phone for purposes of follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active alcohol use treatment
  • Undergoing active evaluation for liver transplantation, is listed for liver transplant, or is post-transplantation.
  • Is enrolled in the multidisciplinary alcohol-related liver disease clinic at Michigan Medicine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: MAIN-ART Behavior Tool
The Michigan Alcohol Improvement Network- Alcohol Reduction and Treatment Tool (MAIN-ART) behavioral intervention is an online web application with two modules: misconception correction and tailored, preference-sensitive alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment matching.
Behavioral: Michigan Alcohol Improvement Network-Alcohol Reduction and Treatment tool
The intervention corrects misconceptions about alcohol use, liver disease, and alcohol treatment and matches patients to their top three choices of treatment while providing them with brief explanations of each treatment option.
No Intervention: Routine care
Patients randomized to usual care will receive a pamphlet for alcohol treatment referral to the University of Michigan Addiction Treatment Services, but will receive no further education from the research team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of MAIN-ART Tool as Measured by Recruitment Rates
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Feasibility of administration of the MAIN-ART tool will be determined by recruitment rates and retention rates (as measured at 6 months after recruitment). Study recruitment started on 23 September, 2020 and concluded on 10 January 2022. The results reflect the number and percent of those patients who were approached, were determined to be eligible, and were consented.
Up to 6 months
Feasibility of MAIN-ART Tool as Measured by Retention Rates
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Feasibility of administration of the MAIN-ART tool will be determined by recruitment rates and retention rates (as measured at 6 months after recruitment). Retention rate is shown by the number of participants who continued in the study for 6 months, and the percentage that it represents compared to those who began it but did not follow through to the end of the study (6 months).
Up to 6 months
Acceptability of the MAIN-ART Tool as Measured by Post-intervention Surveys
Time Frame: Up to 1 hour
On the day the participants engage with the MAIN-ART tool, acceptability will be determined by patient-level surveys. The System usability Survey (SUS) consists of 10 questions ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A scoring algorithm which produces a range from 0 to 100 was used. Current literature suggests that a score above 68 for mean SUS is considered "above average." By "intervention," this measure means interaction with the MAIN-ART tool, which occurs only at the participant's initial visit.
Up to 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol Use Frequency as Measured by the Alcohol Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) Interview
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Alcohol use will be defined according to World Health Organization (WHO) risk drinking level. WHO drinking risk levels were derived from patient reports of the number of standard drinks (defined as 0.6 ounces of absolute alcohol) consumed, which were converted to grams of pure alcohol (0.6 ounces = 14 grams). Ranging from abstinence (0 grams) to very high risk (101+ males / 61+ females grams).
Baseline and 6 months
Alcohol Treatment Engagement as Measured by Number of Participants Who Engaged in Any Alcohol Cessation or Reduction Visit as Measured by Self-report.
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Alcohol treatment engagement will be defined as at least one visit with formal, external assistance in alcohol cessation or reduction including inpatient rehabilitation services, out patient alcohol cessation programs, engagement in therapy of any kind tailored for alcohol cessation, and engagement in any group therapy or support groups for alcohol cessation including alcoholics anonymous, 12 step facilitation and etc.
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Michigan

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jessica Mellinger, MD, MSc, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 7, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HUM00174946
  • 5K23AA026333-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings