Administration of Ropivacaine by Bi-laterosternal Multiperforated Catheters Placed Before a Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery (Pre-BLS-Sterno)

December 2, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

The Effect of Continuous Administration of Ropivacaine by Bi-laterosternal Multiperforated Catheters Placed Before a Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery

The sternotomy site is the most painful site after cardiac surgery. Local infiltration of ropivacaine through the multihole catheters in the bilaterosternal position (BLS) after sternotomy significantly reduces pain at rest and during mobilization, reduces opioids consumption, decreases postoperative complications, improves patient comfort and satisfaction and reduced hospital costs. In this study our hypothesis is to test the efficacity of local anesthetic administration via the catheters in the BLS position placed before the surgical incision.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Goal of the study: Evaluation of the effectiveness of BLS technique on a composite endpoint (pain at rest, pain during patient mobilization and opioid consumption).

Open trial, therapeutic, prospective, monocentric. One group of patients who will benefits from the placement of two multihole catheters in BLS position:

  • The ropivacaine group (40 patients): placement by the surgeon of two catheters in BLS position before the surgical incision. Administration of a bolus dose of 10 ml of ropivacaine 7, 5 mg/mL in each catheter followed by a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml in a rate of 3 mL/h during the first 48 hours postoperatively.
  • The control group (80 patients) from the two previous studies who underwent standard analgesia with PCA morphine.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
    • Puy De Dôme
      • Clermont-Ferrand, Puy De Dôme, France, 63000
        • CHU Clermont-Ferrand - Service de Chirurgie Cardio-Vasculaire

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who undergo scheduled cardiac surgery with sternotomy: aortic or mitral valve replacement, biological or mechanical, coronary bypass surgery
  • Age under 85 years
  • Patients who have given their consent according to the methods described in Title II of the book of the first Public Health Code
  • Possession of Social Security insurance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Approach by thoracotomy
  • Heart transplant
  • Aortic dissection
  • Redo surgery.
  • Pregnant women
  • Refusal of the protocol
  • Protected minors or adults
  • Pre-existing psychiatric pathology including known states of opioid addiction
  • Long-term opioid medication
  • Physical or intellectual inability to use a PCA
  • Severe heart failure (ejection fraction less than 40% or PAH > 50 mmHg)
  • Preoperative cardiogenic shock
  • Severe preoperative chronic or acute renal failure with a creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL / min according to Cockroft's formula
  • Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or to any component of the catheter
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or analgesia protocol (ropivacaine, paracetamol, opiates).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ropivacaine group
Administration of a bolus dose of ropivacaine, followed by a continuous infusion of ropivacaine during the first 48 hours postoperatively.
Drug: Ropivacaine
Administration of a bolus dose of 10 ml of ropivacaine 7, 5 mg/mL in each catheter Continuous infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml in a rate of 3 mL/h during the first 48 hours postoperatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain evaluation
Time Frame: Day 2 postoperatively.
The technique is considered as a fail if : pain rest > 3.5 /10 (0 = no pain; 10 maximum pain) or pain during mobilization > 3.5/10 (0 = no pain; 10 maximum pain)
Day 2 postoperatively.
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: Day 2 postoperatively.
The technique is considered as a fail if morphine consumption > 35 mg
Day 2 postoperatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Days of ICU and hospital stay
Up to 6 months
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Days of ICU and hospital stay
Up to 6 months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 2 postoperatively.

Patient satisfaction evaluation from the patient based on a simple Likert scale:

0 = very bad; 1 = bad; 2 = medium; 3 = good; 4 = excellent.
Day 2 postoperatively.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: Day 1 and 2 postoperatively.
assessed by the Wengritzky intensity scale (if total score > 50, the nausea and vomiting are clincally significant)
Day 1 and 2 postoperatively.
Respiratory complications
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Occurrence of postoperative respiratory complications
Up to 6 months
Cardiac complications
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Occurrence of postoperative cardiac complications
Up to 6 months
Neurological complications
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Occurrence of postoperative neurological complications
Up to 6 months
Renal,complications
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Occurrence of postoperative renal complications
Up to 6 months
Infectious complications
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Occurrence of postoperative infectious complications
Up to 6 months
Chronic pain evaluation
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6th postoperative month
Chronic pain assessed at the 6th postoperative month by DN4 (Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic 4) score
Assessed at the 6th postoperative month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Vedat Eljezi, Dr, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation / Service de Chirurgie Cardio-Vasculaire

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 12, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 12, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 2, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pré-BLS-Sterno-RBHP 2018 ELJEZ

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scheduled Cardiac Surgery

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings