Lymphatic Mapping Of Oropharyngeal Cancer (LOOC)

September 11, 2024 updated by: University College, London

Prospective, Multi-Centre, Phase II Validation Study for a Lymphatic Imaging Protocol in Establishing Drainage Patterns in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer

A multi-centre validation study to evaluate whether a new imaging and surgical protocol would work as well as the current gold standard in identifying sentinel nodes in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cancer at the back of the mouth and throat is usually discovered after it has spread to lymph glands in the neck. Treatment therefore involves dealing with both the original tumour (in the mouth/throat) and the spread cancer in the lymph glands. This type of cancer sometimes spreads to both sides of the neck, not just the side on which the original tumour was located. The decision as to whether to treat the other side of the neck as well depends on various factors including the aggressiveness of the tumour, whether the patient smokes and whether or not the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) is present in the tumour. This is inevitably inexact, and assessing the likelihood of the cancer spreading to the other side of the neck always involves an element of estimation. Some patients end up being treated unnecessarily on both sides (often with severe and lasting effects on swallowing, meaning they have to use a feeding tube), while others receive treatment on one side only but the cancer comes back on the other side.

This study will provide more accurate information on which to base the decision as to whether to treat the other side of the neck. The study will use a procedure known as sentinel node biopsy (SNB) to establish (with a high degree of accuracy) whether or not the cancer has spread to the other side of the neck. The study will be in two stages. The first stage is the imaging stage. A very low does of a radioactive tracer substance will be injected into the tumour. The radioactive tracers used in this study are either Human albumin colloidal particles or Lymphoseek. Once injected, they move quickly into the lymph nodes and can then be detected using a handheld gamma camera. The first nodes that the radiotracer moves into are the "sentinel" nodes. Patients already undergo an examination under anaesthetic (EUA); the patients participating in the study will have the radiotracer injected additionally and the sentinel nodes detected during this EUA. The use of the handheld camera is relatively new; so, all of the patients in the study will also have a CT scan the next day to double check whether the handheld camera identified the sentinel nodes correctly. The second stage of the study, the surgery stage, will involve a new group of patients having the imaging procedure. Those who do have sentinel nodes in the other side of the neck will have them removed during the EUA. Those nodes will then be examined thoroughly for signs of cancer. A separate limb of stage one of the study will involve some patients whose main tumours are easily accessible also having their tumour injected with the radiotracer a second time under local anaesthetic in an outpatient clinic. In the study this will take place several days after the initial injection with the radiotracer. If this procedure is found to be acceptable to patients, it would mean that patients could have the radiotracer injected before the EUA, thereby allowing time for the sentinel nodes to be identified by CT scan so that they can be removed during the EUA. This will provide a way to ensure that, even if the handheld camera cannot be used, the sentinel nodes can still be removed while the patient is under anaesthetic for the EUA. If the study is successful, the patient will be able to have much more accurate information about whether their cancer has, or might, spread to the other side of the neck, without having to undergo an additional general anaesthetic.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
        • Recruiting
        • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
          • Enyi Ofo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 or over
  • New diagnosis of OPC - all anatomical subsites and HPV status accepted
  • Unilateral metastatic nodes equating to AJCC TNM8 clinical staging N1-N2b for P16 negative and N1 for P16 positive patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicious bilateral nodes on imaging
  • Previous radiotherapy or surgery to the neck
  • Second primary oropharyngeal tumours
  • Distant metastasis (e.g. lung, bone)
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Allergy to lymphatic tracers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Surgical Phase
Excision of contralateral nodes identified on imaging *(fhSPECT or SPECT/CT*) during routine examination under anaesthetic. Serial sectioning of excised (sentinel) nodes to identify micrometastasis.
Procedure: Surgical procedure
Excision of contralateral nodes identified on imaging *(fhSPECT or SPECT/CT*) during routine examination under anaesthetic. Serial sectioning of excised (sentinel) nodes to identify micrometastasis.
Experimental: Imaging Phase
During routine examination under anaesthetic 4 x peritumoural injection of investigator's choice of 99mTc-human albumin colloidal particles or Lymphoseek (lymphatic mapping tracer) followed by freehand SPECT scan
Procedure: Imaging procedure
During routine examination under anaesthetic 4 x peritumoural injection of investigator's choice of 99mTc-human albumin colloidal particles or Lymphoseek (lymphatic mapping tracer) followed by freehand SPECT scan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of contralateral drainage
Time Frame: 24 hours post injection
Rate of contralateral drainage
24 hours post injection
Accuracy of detection of contralateral nodes by lymphoscintigraphy using fhSPECT compared to SPECT/CT
Time Frame: 24 hours post injection
Accuracy of detection of contralateral nodes by lymphoscintigraphy using fhSPECT compared to SPECT/CT
24 hours post injection
Number of contralateral nodes on SPECT/CT
Time Frame: 24 hours post injection
Number of contralateral nodes on SPECT/CT will be used as the denominator in calculating the sensitivity of fhSPECT in independently verified images
24 hours post injection
Number and location of contralateral nodes seen with lymphoscintigraphy performed by i) single injection ii) four peritumoural injections (standard practice) as assessed by paired SPECT/CT scans.
Time Frame: 24 hours post injection
Number and location of contralateral nodes seen with lymphoscintigraphy performed by i) single injection ii) four peritumoural injections (standard practice) as assessed by paired SPECT/CT scans.
24 hours post injection
Acceptability to patients assessed by questionnaire.
Time Frame: 24 hours post injection
Acceptability to patients assessed by questionnaire.
24 hours post injection
Occult metastasis rate of contralateral nodes (positive sentinel node biopsy).
Time Frame: 24 hours post injection
Occult metastasis rate of contralateral nodes (positive sentinel node biopsy).
24 hours post injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University College, London

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Clare Schilling, University College, London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 127659

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No identifiable data will be shared with anyone outside the study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oropharyngeal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Surgical procedure

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings