Bear Bile Pill as add-on the Treatment of MDD

August 11, 2020 updated by: Jingjing HUANG, Shanghai Mental Health Center

Add-on Study of Bear Bile Pill for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

This is a single-center, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of bear bile pill, as add-on therapy in MDD patients conducted in Shang Hai Mental Health Center. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of bear bile pill in reducing symptoms of depression in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)patients with inadequate response to current antidepressant therapy. Following a screening period, subjects who meet the entry criteria will be randomized to treated with either placebo or 450mg bear bile pill three times daily for 8 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Shanghai, China
        • Jing jing Huang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Meets the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-V) criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); a single or recurrent episode without psychotic features ;Codes are as follows: F32.0、F32.1、F32.2、F33.0、F33.1 、F33.2.
  2. Outpatients or inpatients.
  3. Male or female subjects aged 18-65 years.
  4. Patients have got standard treatment of SSRI/SNRI monotherapy for more than 4 weeks in current episode of depression before trial entry.
  5. MADRS score greater than 20.
  6. Women of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception throughout the study period and the following one month.
  7. The patient the patient fully understand and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has survived a suicide attempt or has acute suicidal tendencies (MADRS Item 10 > 4).
  2. Comorbidity according to DSM-V, axis I except major depressive disorder.
  3. Failed 3 or more adequate antidepressant courses in current episode of depression.
  4. MADRS reduction ratio ≥25% within one week from the screening to the baseline Visit.
  5. Depressive episode secondary to psychiatric illness or somatic disease.
  6. Serious and instable body disease such as cerebrovascular disease, liver and kidney disease, disease of internal secretion (abnormal thyroid function), blood disease; any history of seizures or other organic brain diseases.
  7. History of alcohol or drug abuse over the last 6 months
  8. Allergic history to bear bile pills, or serious drug allergic history.
  9. Pregnant or lactating women and women of childbearing potential throughout the study period; men who have the desire of fertility within six months;
  10. Clinically significant changes in ECG or laboratory tests, including >1.5X upper limit of normal liver function、over the limit of normal renal function and blood sugar、abnormal cardiac troponins、obvious abnormity in the thyroid function
  11. Treatment with MECT or rTMS in nearly three months.
  12. Treatment with a systematic psychological treatment in nearly three months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: bear bile pill
Patients randomized to the bear bile pill arm will receive treatment with 15 pills, three times daily of bear bile pill (1350mg per day) plus on-going antidepressant therapy (SSRI/SNRI).
Drug: bear bile pill
Bear bile pill (15 pills) taken orally three times a day after meals with water.
Placebo Comparator: placebo
Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive 15 pills, three times daily of placebo plus on-going antidepressant therapy (SSRI/SNRI).
Drug: placebo
Placebo(15 pills) taken orally three times a day after meals with water.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the total Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score between randomization and end of study.
Time Frame: assessed from baseline to week 8(end of study)
The main objective is to explore whether bear bile pill add on SSRI or SNRI will improve the MDD symptoms after 8 weeks of treatment, and investigators assess the scale at baseline and week 1, 2, 4, 8.
assessed from baseline to week 8(end of study)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effective treatment
Time Frame: assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
effectivity：MADRS or HAMD reduction ratio ≥50% reductive ratio: [（Baseline score- Endpoint score）／Baseline score]×100%
assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
Clinical remission rate
Time Frame: assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
patients who are in remission at the end of the study will be summarized by treatment group, MADRS score ≤12 or HAMD-17≤7.
assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) reduction ratio
Time Frame: assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
MADRS reduction ratio were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment,and investigators assess the scale at baseline and week 1, 2, 4, 8.
assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) reduction ratio
Time Frame: assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale reduction ratio were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment,and investigators assess the scale at baseline and week 1, 2, 4, 8.
assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
change in the total score of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA)
Time Frame: assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
change in total score of the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale.
Time Frame: assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
change in total score of the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale.
Time Frame: assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)
assessed from baseline to week 8 (end of study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Mental Health Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jingjing huang, Shanghai Mental Health Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NCTNCT04002259

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings