Study to Learn More About the Potential of Antifungal Cream V61-044 Containing Trolamine to Cause Irritant Reaction of the Skin to Ultra Violet Light in Healthy Human Subjects

October 21, 2020 updated by: Bayer

HT201308- Human Phototoxicity Test

In this study researchers want to gather information about the potential of Antifungal Cream V61-044 containing Trolamine to produce a phototoxic reaction on the skin. A phototoxic reaction is an irritant reaction of the skin to ultra violet light. In order to find this out the study drug will be applied to the skin of healthy human subjects. By using a solar simulator to generate a UV spectrum similar to that of sunlight the potential of the study drug to produce a superficial reddening of the skin will be measured.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Jersey
      • Fairfield, New Jersey, United States, 07004

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have been between the ages of 18 and 60 years;
  • Participants must have been lightly pigmented (Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I, II, III);
  • Participants must have been in good general health as determined by the subject's medical history;
  • Participants must have been willing to avoid tanning bed usage and additional sun exposure during the trial and follow-up period;
  • Participants must have been willing to refrain from using any new topical products during the trial;
  • Participants must have been able and willing to cooperate with the Investigator and research staff, to have test materials applied according to protocol, and to complete the full course of the trial;
  • Participants must have been willing to report any medications taken during the trial and refrain from taking any medications during the trial that might produce photoreactions;
  • If female, participants must produce a negative urine pregnancy test prior to the initiation and also at the completion of the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must not have had visible sunburn;
  • Participants must not have had a history of sun hypersensitivity/photosensitivity, or photosensitive dermatoses;
  • Participants must not have had a history of allergies or sensitivities to cosmetics, toiletries, or any dermatological products;
  • Participants must not have recently used any systemic or topical drugs which could have caused a photoreaction or may have interfered with the trial;
  • Participants must not have had any known skin conditions that might interfere with the proper conduct of the trial;
  • Participants must not have had scars, moles, excessive hair, or other blemishes over the mid or lower back which might have interfered with the test or the grading of the test sites;
  • Participants must not have had significant history of internal disease that may have interfered with the evaluation of the test material as determined by the Investigator;
  • Participants must not have been pregnant, planning pregnancy, or nursing a child during the trial period;
  • Participants must not have used a tanning bed or other artificial tanning lights within the past two months;
  • Participants must not have participated in a patch test involving the back within four weeks prior to the start of the trial;
  • Participants must not have concurrently participated in any other clinical or consumer test;
  • Participants must not have had other conditions considered by the Investigator as sound reasons for disqualification from enrollment into the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Phototoxicity reaction test
Participants received approximately 60 μl of Butenafine HCl 1% on the treated irradiated test site followed by Ultraviolet Radiation (UV) irradiation and to the treated non-irradiated test site without UV irradiation. Participants also had two more test sites, the untreated irradiated control site without Butenafine HCl 1% followed by UV irradiation and the untreated non-irradiated control site without Butenafine HCl 1% or UV irradiation. All test sites were evaluated for erythema on the following day. Afterwards, participants received same procedure on all 4 test sites, and evaluation of the test sites occurred at 24 hours and 48 hours post-irradiation.
Drug: Butenafine HCl 1% (BAY1896425)
Approximately 60 μl of Butenafine HCl 1% applied twice to the treated irradiated site and to the treated non-irradiated site for a total application of 240 μl of Butenafine HCl 1%.
Other Names:
  • Antifungal Cream V61-044 containing Trolamine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phototoxic Reaction Evaluation Reported as Number of Test Site With Different Erythema Score
Time Frame: Immediately before irradiation, 24 hours after irradiation, and 48 hours after irradiation
Evaluation of the test sites after irradiation used following scoring system: score 0=Normal skin; score 1=Faint, barely perceptible to moderate redness with poorly defined margins (not clinically significant); score 2=Moderate to intense redness with well defined margins; score 3=Redness plus well defined edema; score 4=Redness plus papules, vesicles, or ulceration. All four test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythemal Scoring Scale and if necessary the Additional Scoring system immediately before irradiation, 24 hours after irradiation, and 48 hours after irradiation (3 different time points), thus for each type of test site (i.e. treated irradiated test site), a total of 87 test sites with scores were collected (i.e., 29 participants *3 time points = 87 sites).
Immediately before irradiation, 24 hours after irradiation, and 48 hours after irradiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of Erythema on the Treated Non-irradiated Test Sites, Which Would Indicate Irritant Contact Dermatitis and a Pre-existing Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Time Frame: Immediately before irradiation, 24 hours after irradiation, and 48 hours after irradiation
Evaluation of the test sites after irradiation used following scoring system: score 0=Normal skin; score 1=Faint, barely perceptible to moderate redness with poorly defined margins (not clinically significant); score 2=Moderate to intense redness with well defined margins; score 3=Redness plus well defined edema; score 4=Redness plus papules, vesicles, or ulceration. All four test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythemal Scoring Scale and if necessary the Additional Scoring system immediately before irradiation, 24 hours after irradiation, and 48 hours after irradiation (3 different time points), thus for each type of test site (i.e. treated irradiated test site), a total of 87 test sites with scores were collected (i.e., 29 participants *3 time points = 87 sites).
Immediately before irradiation, 24 hours after irradiation, and 48 hours after irradiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 24, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 28, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 28, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18154

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Availability of this study's data will be determined according to Bayer's commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, timepoint and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified researchers patient-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the US and EU as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct research. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the Study sponsors section of the portal.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings