Topical Arnica and Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate on Postoperative Pain, Edema and Trismus

August 27, 2020 updated by: Koray Onur Sanal, Abant Izzet Baysal University

Influence of Different Topical Arnica and Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate on Postoperative Pain, Edema and Trismus After Extraction of Impacted Third Molar

The present study was to evaluate the effect of topical Arnica and MPSP application with respect to visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, maximal interincisal opening (MIO) and edema values after mandibular impacted third molar removal on days 1, 3, 5 and 10 postoperatively. The following null hypotheses of the present research were determined as follows: usage of topical agents would not influence i) VAS scores, ii) MIO values, and iii) edema values on 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th days after the mandibular impacted third molar surgery

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Bolu, Turkey, 14030
        • Abant Izzet Baysal University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 68 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 16-68 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 1 physiological status
  • Consistent radiological and clinical data
  • Volunteered to participate in the study
  • Scale II" surgery difficulty according to Modified Parant Classification for mandibular impacted third molar removal, be free of pericoronitis and infection at operation time

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being out of age range
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Analgesic or antibiotic therapy history in last 14 days due to symptoms of related third molar
  • Smoking cigarette
  • Any pathology associated with impacted third molar
  • Active complaints on preoperative examination on the day of surgery
  • Immunosuppressed or diagnosed with malignancy
  • Diagnosed chronic diseases such as; Diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, cerebrovascular event, psychiatric diseases, coagulopathies
  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Patients who could not attend regular follow-up visits
  • Allergy to the medications prescribed or utilized in study protocol
  • Inconsistent clinical and radiological data or missed follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Postoperative topical arnica montana cream
In this arm, Arnica group consisted of 20 patients who were treated with topical arnica in addition to standard therapy (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500/125 mg twice a day and diclofenac potassium 50 mg twice a day) after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.
Drug: : Arnica montana
In Arnica group, patients were given an unlabelled tube containing cream to be applicated topically on skin surface of masseteric and submandibular region, 2 cm in length cream for each 8 hours, starting immediately after surgery and continued for 10 days
Other Names:
  • Arnika Krem
Active Comparator: Postoperative topical mucopolysaccharide polysulfate cream
In this arm, Mucopolysaccharide polysulfate group consisted of 20 patients who were treated with topical arnica in addition to standard therapy (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500/125 mg twice a day and diclofenac potassium 50 mg twice a day) after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.
Drug: Mucopolysaccharide polysulfate
In Arnica group and MPSP group, patients were given an unlabelled tube containing cream to be applicated topically on skin surface of masseteric and submandibular region, 2 cm in length cream for each 8 hours, starting immediately after surgery and continued for 10 days
Other Names:
  • Hirudoid Fort Krem 445mg/100g
Other: Control group
In this arm control group consisted of 20 patients who were treated with only standard therapy (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500/125 mg twice a day and diclofenac potassium 50 mg twice a day) after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.
Other: Control group
In Control group, only standard therapy was performed after surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preoperative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: On the day of surgery preoperatively
The patients were assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), 10 cm in length, ranging from 0 for "no pain" to 10 for "the worst possible pain". Preoperative VAS value recorded.
On the day of surgery preoperatively
Change From Baseline Maximal Interincisal Opening (MIO) on Postoperative Follow Up Visits
Time Frame: Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative first, third, fifth and tenth days
All patients' maximal interincisal opening were measured and recorded as the distance between upper and lower central incisors. Preoperative MIO value recorded. The measurements were repeated as described above in the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th days after surgery and recorded.
Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative first, third, fifth and tenth days
3. Change From Baseline Facial Measurements for Evaluation of Edema on Postoperative Follow Up Visits
Time Frame: Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative first, third, fifth and tenth days
The level of edema was determined by a modification of tape measuring method described by Gabka and Matsumara [20, 21]. Three measurements (in mm) (AC, AE and BE) were made between 5 reference points: A) tragus, B) lateral corner of the eye, C) outer corner of the mouth, D) angle of the mandible, and E) soft tissue pogonion. The mean of three preoperative measurements was calculated and recorded. The measurements were repeated as described above in the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th days after surgery.
Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative first, third, fifth and tenth days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Abant Izzet Baysal University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Neşet Akay, Abant Izzet Baysal University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Abant Izzet Baysal University
  • 2018/284 (Other Identifier: Clinical Researches and Ethics Committee of Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All individual participant data (IPD) related to study protocol and results will be shared during submitting as an article.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The present study will be transformed to an article in six months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All IPD and supporting information data will be accessible after publication of the article

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings