Efficacy of Personalizing Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia by Targeting Impairments in Early Auditory Processing

March 4, 2026 updated by: Alice A. Medalia, PhD, Columbia University

The primary aim of this study is to provide confirmation that Cognitive Remediation (CR) for schizophrenia, when personalized based on pre-treatment assessment of early auditory processing ability, facilitates improved cognitive and functional outcomes. Additional aims of this study address the mechanisms of treatment effect. The study uses a repeated-measures randomized trial design.

Enrollment will be by invitation, open to individuals receiving services at select community behavioral health facilities where CR is offered. Clients who are eligible for the service, who agree to participate in research and who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be assessed on outcome measures and categorized via performance on the Tone Matching (TM) test, as EAP impaired (EAP-) or EAP intact (EAP+). Subsequently, EAP- and EAP+ subgroups will be randomized to either (1) Brain Basics (BB; n = 100), an EAP-enhanced CR approach or (2) Brain Training (BT; n = 100), a routine CR approach. Participants will be invited to participate in a second pre-treatment assessment to measure electrophysiologic responses to auditory stimuli. All participants will be scheduled to repeat outcome measure assessments after treatment and after a follow-up period. The EAP- group receiving BB will be invited to repeat electrophysiological paradigms post-treatment to investigate mechanisms of change related to the CR intervention. Verbal learning will be the primary outcome with functional capacity the secondary outcome. EEG is exploratory and will examine neurophysiologic markers of need for and response to EAP training.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This personalized Cognitive Remediation (CR) confirmatory efficacy trial will be conducted at behavioral health facilities offering CR, located within the New York metropolitan area. Participants for this study will include adults diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, age 18-68, who have identified cognitive health as a pertinent treatment for recovery goal attainment and are seeking CR services. Individuals referred to CR may be referred for research by their treating clinician or may be self-referred. Consented individuals will receive a numeric study ID which will be used to de-identify all data collected for research.

Time 1 (baseline) outcomes assessments conducted by the research team include early auditory processing (EAP) ability, cognitive ability, and functioning. Participants will be classified as EAP impaired (EAP-) or EAP intact (EAP+). Following completion of Time 1 assessments, assignment to treatment condition will be stratified by EAP ability and randomized to Brain Basics (BB, n=100) or Brain Training (BT, n=100). Participants will be invited to participate in a separate EEG assessment of Mismatch Negativity (MMN).

CR will be conducted by trained clinicians at each performance site. CR will entail 30, 60-minute sessions administered two times a week (approximately 15 weeks). All participants will continue to receive recovery oriented therapeutic activities. Participants will be scheduled to repeat behavioral assessments at Time 2 (post-treatment) and Time 3 (follow-up) with a research team member who is blind to treatment group. The EAP- group receiving Brain Basics will also repeat EEG paradigms at Time 2 to explore mechanisms of change related to the CR intervention.

Verbal learning will be the primary outcome with functional capacity the secondary outcome. EEG is exploratory and will examine neurophysiologic markers of need for and response to EAP training. Mediation analysis will examine whether gains in cognition (verbal learning) mediate the gains in EAP and functioning. This will inform our understanding of EAP as the therapeutic change mechanism for about half of CR participants and confirm that EAP training need not be given to those CR participants with baseline intact EAP.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
194

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • Stamford, Connecticut, United States, 06902
        • Laurel House
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11206
        • Williamsburg Clinic
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11207
        • Institute for Community Living
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11217
        • Heights Hill Clinic
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11230
        • Mapleton Mental Health Services
      • New York, New York, United States, 10025
        • The Bridge, Inc.
      • New York, New York, United States, 10027
        • Manhattan Psychiatric Center 125th Street Clinic
      • Orangeburg, New York, United States, 10962
        • Rockland Psychiatric Center
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Pibly Residential Programs Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 64 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A primary DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • Psychiatrically stable, as defined by no changes in psychotropic medication or psychiatric hospitalization in the most recent 21 days
  • English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indications of Intellectual Disability as documented in medical history or measured by < 70 premorbid Full Scale IQ
  • Documented auditory disorder or known visual impairment; presence of neurological conditions that are impacting brain and cognitive functioning
  • Unremitted substance dependence within the past six months
  • Participation in cognitive remediation in the 24 months prior

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Brain Basics
Brain Basics is a cognitive remediation intervention that emphasizes training in early auditory processing.
Behavioral: Brain Basics

Computer-based exercises targeting impairments in cognitive domains (sensory processing, processing speed, attention, working memory, memory) are paired with verbal discussions and group-based activities to strengthen metacognition and to bridge newly learned cognitive skills to everyday.

life.
Active Comparator: Brain Training
Brain Training is a cognitive remediation intervention that targets a range of cognitive abilities
Behavioral: Brain Training
Computer-based exercises targeting impairments in cognitive domains (processing speed, attention, working memory, executive functions) are paired with verbal discussions and group-based activities to strengthen metacognition and to bridge newly learned cognitive skills to everyday life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Verbal Learning
Time Frame: 15 weeks
Verbal Learning is assessed with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Verbal Learning Domain score. The primary outcome will be change in this score from pre to post treatment such that a higher value represents a better outcome.
15 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Capacity
Time Frame: 15 weeks
Functional Capacity is assessed with the UCSD Performance Based Skills Assessment, Brief version. The secondary outcome will be change in the total score from pre to post treatment such that a higher value represents a better outcome.
15 weeks
Change in Global Neurocognition
Time Frame: 15 weeks
Global neurocognition is assessed with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite Domain score. The outcome will be change in this score from pre to post treatment such that a higher value represents a better outcome.
15 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alice Medalia, Ph.D., Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 8, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAAU8479
  • 7982 (Other Identifier: New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board)
  • 1R01MH123561-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Raw data will be made available for research to investigators working under a Federal Wide Assurance who meet security measures and data use agreement criteria associated with public repositories including the National Database for Clinical Trials related to Mental Illness (NDCT). Data will include baseline demographic data, and baseline and post raw data derived from primary and secondary outcome measures.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

A list of all data expected to be collected in the project will be submitted by January 2021. Subsequently, descriptive and raw data will be submitted on a semi-annual basis. Unpublished de-identified data will be submitted prior to study completion and will be shared within one year after project completion, or when the data are published, whichever is earlier.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data in NIH repositories may be accessed through the NIH Data Access Committee which reviews data access and submission requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Brain Basics

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings