Association Between Genetic Variant Scores and P2Y12 Inhibitor Effects (CARES1)

February 15, 2023 updated by: Cipherome, Inc.

Correlation Between Bleeding Complication and Treatment Failure on P2Y12 Inhibitors and Its Predictions Based on Cipherome's Pharmacogenomic Technology

The goal of this study is to predict and prevent adverse drug events by investigating the impact of genetic variants, demographics, and environmental factors in subjects status post myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary insertion who have experienced adverse drug events while on P2Y12 inhibitors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The goal of this study it to validate Cipherome's drug safety score (DSS) in its predictive accuracy for severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with preliminary studies demonstrating that scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher chance of an ADR and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower chance of an ADR.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects (status post myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary insertion) who have experienced adverse drug events while on P2Y12 inhibitors in order to improve future prediction and prevention of adverse events.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients 18 years and older, who are on P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor).
  2. Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Lack of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
ADR Group
Major Bleeding BARC Bleeding Criteria Type 2,3,5
Control Group
No ADR or treatment failure, case-control matched to experimental groups
Treatment Failure Group
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's drug safety score (DSS) in correlating with serious ADRs in subjects on P2Y12 inhibitors.
Time Frame: Within 24 months of clopidogrel therapy initiation
The primary endpoint is to assess the predictive accuracy of the DSS compared to actual clinical outcomes of treatment failure (major adverse cardiovascular events or MACE) or bleeding (per BARC criteria) in subjects on P2Y12 inhibitors. The DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with preliminary studies demonstrating that scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher chance of an ADR and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower chance of an ADR.
Within 24 months of clopidogrel therapy initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the predictive accuracy of the DSS in correlating with serious ADRs compared to clinical guidelines (e.g., Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC)) in subjects on P2Y12 inhibitors.
Time Frame: Within 24 months of clopidogrel therapy initiation
The secondary endpoint is to assess the predictive accuracy of the DSS compared to current evidence-based clinical guidelines, such as CPIC, for serious ADRs (e.g., treatment failure such as MACE) for subjects on P2Y12 inhibitors.
Within 24 months of clopidogrel therapy initiation
To assess the predictive accuracy of the DSS in correlating with major bleeding compared to clinical guidelines (CPIC) in subjects on P2Y12 inhibitors.
Time Frame: Within 24 months of clopidogrel therapy initiation
The secondary endpoint is to assess the predictive accuracy of the DSS compared to CPIC, for major bleeding per BARC criteria, in subjects on P2Y12 inhibitors.
Within 24 months of clopidogrel therapy initiation

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To discover novel pharmacogenetic variants associated with P2Y12 metabolism.
Time Frame: Within 24 months of clopidogrel therapy initiation
We will assess the DSS within genes and evaluate the genetic-pathways for P2Y12 metabolism. Novel variants will be assessed using whole genome sequencing to evaluate the genetic pathways in individuals with serious ADRs and treatment failures. Through our analyses we intend to identify novel genetic variants in subjects with serious ADRs or treatment failure while on P2Y12 inhibitors.
Within 24 months of clopidogrel therapy initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cipherome, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jungwon Suh, MD, SNUBH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 9, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C03-001 BD002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings