Rate of Bony Fusion Using NanoBone® Synthetic Bone Graft Versus Local Autologous Bone Graft. (BONE)

February 11, 2025 updated by: Artoss Inc.

Comparison of Fusion Success Between NanoBone Synthetic Bone Graft and Local Autogenous Bone Graft in Posterolateral Spinal Fusion

The objectives of this longitudinal study are to assess and measure fusion status (fused or not fused) and rate of bony fusion using NanoBone® Synthetic Bone Graft in patients requiring one to two level lumbar posterolateral fusion procedures with or without commercially available rigid spinal instrumentation. Our hypothesis is that the Nanobone synthetic bone graft will be as effective at creating a fusion in the lumbar spine as compared with a local bone graft. Each subject will serve as their own control during this study, as patients will receive the Nanobone graft on the right side of their spine and the local bone graft on their left side.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjects will be recruited for this study from among those scheduled to undergo 1-2 level posterolateral spinal fusion procedures with bone grafting for degenerative disc disease or grade 1-3 spondylolisthesis. The study will entail each subject having a local bone graft placed on the left side of their spine, with Nanobone placed on the right side of their spine during the procedure. Eligible and consenting patients recruited for this study will be subject to the standard of care. This includes the following visits: preoperative, operative, post-discharge, 4 months postoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 2-years postoperative. They will be subject to standard of care imaging modalities including AP, lateral, and flexion/extension lumbar radiographs at pre-operative, post-discharge, 4-months postoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 2-year postoperative time points. Standard of care advanced imaging including a CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan will be performed pre-operatively. Patients will also receive standard of care clinical examinations and self-assessments at all clinic visits. Imaging obtained outside the standard of care for this study will include 1-year and 2-year lumbar CT scans to evaluate fusion. The 2-year lumbar CT scan will only be required if fusion has not been demonstrated at the time of the 1-year lumbar CT scan. Patients enrolled in this study who are treated with rigid pedicle screw fixation must be treated using rigid pedicle screw instrumentation appropriate for posterolateral spinal fusions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01605
        • UMass Memorial Health Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The individual has signed and dated a study specific informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board at UMMHC.
  2. The individual is 18 to 85 years of age.
  3. The individual is skeletally mature.
  4. The individual has been diagnosed with 1 or 2 level degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis grade 1-3 with or without spinal stenosis, requiring posterolateral spinal fusion surgery with bone grafting.
  5. The individual is physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The individual has had any previous attempts at fusion, at any lumbar levels.
  2. The individual is morbidly obese (defined as 100 lbs over the recommended ideal weight as described in the Metropolitan Life Height and Weight Tables for Men and Women and or having a BMI >39).
  3. Patients with osteopenia, osteoporosis, or osteomalacia to a degree that spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated.
  4. Patients with systemic collagen, bone or mineralization dysfunction (such as Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome).
  5. Patients who suffer from uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type I or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II. (definition based on the glycosylated Haemoglobin level)
  6. Patients who are suffering from autoimmune disease.
  7. Patients who previously underwent chemotherapy, immunosuppressive disease or radiation to the local area.
  8. Patients who received or are currently receiving corticosteroids (> 2 years > 5 mg prednisolone equivalent/d).
  9. Patients with active local or systemic infection.
  10. Patients with any known active malignancy.
  11. Patients with other concurrent physical or mental conditions which are likely to affect their outcome.
  12. Patient unable to consent for themselves
  13. Pregnant women
  14. Non-English speaking subjects. These subjects are excluded because they would not be able to complete the English-language surveys required during this study. Only English language versions of these surveys have been validated.
  15. Prisoners
  16. Patients less than 18 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Single arm subject is own control
Posterolateral fusion is bilateral, patients will receive the Nanobone graft on the right side of their spine and the local bone graft on their left side.
Device: NanoBone
Nanobone® Synthetic Bone Graft is a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite imbedded in a silica gel matrix. The nanocrystalline structure accurately replicates autologous hydroxyapatite and the silica gel matrix that rapidly transforms into an osteogenic matrix post-implantation. NanoBone promotes remodeling by acting as a strong osteoinductive material. NanoBone® is available as a putty.
Other Names:
  • NanoHA (SiO2)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic Fusion
Time Frame: 12 months

Fusion will be defined as:

  • Evidence of bridging trabecular bone between the transverse processes of the involved vertebral bodies
  • Translational motion < 3.5mm on flexion/extension radiographs; and
  • Angular motion <5 degrees on flexion/extension radiographs.
12 months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 0% lowest, no disability to 100% disabled, bedridden
Time Frame: 12 months
Change from pre-operative score
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0-no pain to 10-worst possible pain
Time Frame: 12 months
Change from pre-operative score
12 months
SF-36 (Short Form 36)
Time Frame: 12 months
Change from pre-operative score
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Artoss Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Connelly, MD, UMass Memorial Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H0015310

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings