Subacromial Bursa Re-Implantation After Rotator Cuff Repair
Subacromial Bursa Re-Implantation After Rotator Cuff Repair - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Present with rotator cuff tears requiring arthroscopic repair as confirmed by a medical expert
- Are able to provide informed consent
- Can commit to study follow-up visits or procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Are unable to provide informed consent
- Have additional ipsilateral shoulder complications that will inhibit standard of care treatment and rehabilitation
- Have active infection at operative site
- Have active systemic infection
- Chronic inflammatory condition such as rheumatoid arthritis or lupus
- Has had a corticosteroid injection to the affected shoulder within the six weeks prior to surgery
- Have had prior surgical interventions in the past that have modified the existing natural anatomical arrangement of the rotator cuff/shoulder.
- Non-English speaker
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental group
|
Prior to all rotator cuff repairs, a subacromial bursectomy is performed with an oscillating shaver so that the rotator cuff can be visualized and repaired.In the experimental group, instead of being discarded, this minced bursal tissue will be collected via a sterile filtration device attached to the oscillating shaver.
The bursal tissue is then placed into a sterile syringe, and reimplanted back onto the bursal surface of the rotator cuff repair at the completion of the case.
The arthroscopic fluid is turned off, and fluid is evacuated from the shoulder prior to reimplantation of the bursa.. Nothing is added to the bursa prior to reimplantation.
There are no reagents.
The bursa tissue is purely the minced bursa tissue removed from the patient, and never leaves the sterile field.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
|
Prior to all rotator cuff repairs, a subacromial bursectomy is performed with an oscillating shaver so that the rotator cuff can be visualized and repaired.The current standard of care procedure is to discard this tissue, and then proceed with the rotator cuff repair
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in range of motion
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
range of motion will be measured using a goniometer
|
2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
|
Change in strength of shoulder
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
shoulder strength will be measured using handheld dynamometer
|
2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
|
Change in pain of shoulder as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
This is scored form 0-100,lower score means worse pain
|
2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
|
Change in functional limitations of shoulder as measured by the Simple Shoulder Test(SST)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
The SST consists of 12 questions with dichotomous (yes/ no) response options.
For each question, the patients indicate that they are able or are not able to do the activity.
The scores range from 0 (worst) to 12(best)
|
2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
|
Change in pain as assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
The VAS is scored form 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain
|
2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Tests (CATs)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
PROMIS CAT-PF is scored on a scale from 20-80, where a higher number indicates higher function
|
2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery,1 year after surgery,2 years after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Number of participants with improvement in structural integrity as assessed by postoperative MRI
Time Frame: 6 months post surgery
|
6 months post surgery
|
|
Number of participants with improvement in structural integrity as assessed by postoperative MRI
Time Frame: 12 months post surgery
|
12 months post surgery
|
|
Number of participants with improvement in tendon organization as assessed using quantitative postoperative ultrashort magnetic resonance imaging (UTE-MRI) using the same MRI scans from the 6- and 12-month time points.
Time Frame: 6 months post surgery
|
6 months post surgery
|
|
Number of participants with improvement in tendon organization as assessed using quantitative postoperative ultrashort magnetic resonance imaging (UTE-MRI) using the same MRI scans from the 6- and 12-month time points.
Time Frame: 12 months post surgery
|
12 months post surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: James M Gregory, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-19-1092
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.