Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM)

March 12, 2024 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University

Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) in Primary Brain Tumor Patients

The purpose of this study is to pilot test an empirically supported psychotherapeutic intervention, Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM). Researchers hope to better understand the potential benefits of this intervention on brain tumor patients' mood and quality of life. This may lead to improvements in doctor's understanding of how to enhance brain tumor patient's wellbeing and overall functioning.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this study, participants will be asked to do the following things:

  1. Complete ~15-minute online surveys before the program, immediately after the program (4 months), and at follow-up (6 months). . Questions will ask about mood, anxiety, death distress, quality of social relationships, and satisfaction with life.
  2. Meet with an interventionist six times (biweekly) for individual sessions via Zoom, lasting 50-60 minutes each. Sessions will be audio-recorded to ensure all participants receive the same information. Participants will be asked to only use first names.
  3. Complete weekly ~5 minute online surveys after each session on satisfaction with the program.
  4. Complete an exit interview by telephone approximately 1 month after the 6-session intervention. This exit interview will last approximately 15-30 minutes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have a confirmed malignant brain cancer diagnosis via histopathology
  • be a minimum of 2 weeks post-surgical resection or biopsy (if applicable)
  • be primarily English speaking
  • be age 18-89
  • obtain >20 on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)
  • have current elevated depression or death anxiety symptoms
  • have a reliable internet connection to participate in the Zoom therapy sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major communication difficulties as determined by the research team which would prohibit psychotherapeutic interaction
  • inability to meet with interventionist via an electronic device for telehealth intervention sessions
  • inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Therapy
psychotherapeutic intervention
Behavioral: Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy
6 sessions of individualized CALM therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment for CALM
Time Frame: 1 day
Number of potential participants consented and enrolled
1 day
Completion of CALM Sessions
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of participants completing CALM sessions
3 months
Post-session Assessment Completion
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of participants completing post-session surveys
4 months
Follow-up Assessment Completion
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of participants that completed a follow-up survey
6 months
Satisfaction With CALM Sessions
Time Frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Average rating of CALM session satisfaction score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Helpfulness of CALM Sessions
Time Frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Average rating of CALM session helpfulness score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all helpful and 5 being very much helpful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Relevance of CALM
Time Frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Average rating of CALM session relevance score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all relevant and 5 being very much relevant. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Utility of CALM
Time Frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Average rating of CALM session utility score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all useful and 5 being very much useful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Intervention Satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 month - one timepoint
Mean rating of intervention satisfaction score (average score across all participants who completed the CALM intervention - one timepoint). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
3 month - one timepoint
Number of Participants Likely to Recommend the Program to Others
Time Frame: 3 month timepoint
Rating of the likelihood of recommending the program to others.
3 month timepoint

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Virginia Commonwealth University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
American Cancer Society, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ashlee Loughan, PhD, Virginia Commonwealth University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 14, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MCC-20-16440
  • HM20020308 (Other Identifier: Virginia Commonwealth University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual level data will not be shared other researchers. Access to all data will be limited to study personnel.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings