Enhancing Cognitive Control in Mild Cognitive Impairment Via Non-invasive Brain Stimulation

April 19, 2023 updated by: University of California, San Francisco
The overall goal of this project is to improve cognitive control abilities in adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) through a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

30 older adults aged 60-80 years with md-aMCI were randomized to 8 sessions of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) with simultaneous cognitive control training (CCT). The intervention took place within the participant's home without direct researcher assistance. Half of the participants received prefrontal theta tACS during CCT and the other half received control tACS. Outcomes were assessed pre and post intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • Grade 12 or more education
  • Normal or corrected to normal vision and hearing
  • Ability to complete cognitive tasks
  • Ability to cooperate and comply with all study procedures
  • Ability to tolerate tACS
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment score: 17-28
  • -1 z-score on immediate memory, delayed memory, fluency, processing speed, or task switch
  • Self-reported memory complaint

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders other than mild cognitive impairment
  • Receiving investigational medications or have participated in a trial with investigational medications within last 30 days
  • Family history of epilepsy
  • Implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker)
  • Prior head trauma
  • Pregnant
  • IQ < 80
  • Taking cholinesterase inhibitory, memantine, or psychotropic medication
  • Taking anti-depressants or anti-anxiety medication
  • Color blind
  • Substance abuse
  • Glaucoma
  • Macular degeneration
  • Amblyopia (lazy eye)
  • Strabismus (crossed eyes)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Theta Stimulation Group
This group will receive 6 Hz (theta) stimulation
Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) will be applied across the prefrontal cortex near electrodes coordinates AF3/AF4
Active Comparator: Delta Stimulation Group
This group will receive 1 Hz (delta) stimulation
Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) will be applied across the prefrontal cortex near electrodes coordinates AF3/AF4

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Divided Attention Performance
Time Frame: Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Divided attention was assessed as the difficulty level achieved during perceptual discrimination performance while participants were engaged in the Akili AKL-T01 task. Higher is better.
Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Divided Attention Performance
Time Frame: Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Divided attention was assessed as the difficulty level achieved during perceptual discrimination performance while participants were engaged in the Akili AKL-T01 task. Higher is better.
Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Sustained Attention Performance
Time Frame: Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Sustained attention was assessed via response times to visual targets during the continuous performance task. Lower is better.
Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Sustained Attention Performance
Time Frame: Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Sustained attention was assessed via response times to visual targets during the continuous performance task. Lower is better.
Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Working Memory Performance
Time Frame: Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Working memory was assessed as the average maximum number correct from the ACE-X span tasks - memory for order of illuminated squares.
Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Working Memory Performance
Time Frame: Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Working memory was assessed as the average maximum number correct from the ACE-X span tasks - memory for order of illuminated squares
Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Time Frame: Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Scores on the IADL will be assessed pre and post intervention. Higher scores are better (minimum = 0, maximum = 4).
Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Time Frame: Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Scores on the IADL will be assessed pre and post intervention. Higher scores are better (minimum = 0, maximum = 4).
Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Francisco

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Theodore Zanto, Ph.D., University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 132026a
  • R21AG062395 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The dataset includes self-reported information, behavioral and electrophysiological data. The final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing, thereby anonymizing the data. We will make the anonymized data available to users only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to attempt to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. This will be in accordance with human subject regulations.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available after the results have been determined and the study researchers are unblinded. The data will be available indefinitely upon request.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact PI.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings