Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Geriatrics Bundle in the ICU (ACE-ICU)
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Geriatrics Bundle in the Intensive Care Unit (ACE-ICU)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
- Yale-New Haven Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 65 years
- Hospitalized in the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) on the York Street campus of Yale-New Haven Hospital.
- Has not opted out of research
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to provide informed consent and no proxy available
- Advance directive of "comfort measures only" (CMO) or change to CMO anticipated during this hospital admission
- Planned discharge to hospice
- Primary language other than English
- Tracheostomy with long-term ventilator dependence
- Patients with non-family conservators (e.g. a lawyer serving as the conservator for the patient)
- Unable to participate in the OT and hearing impairment interventions due to cognitive status (e.g. advanced dementia, anoxic brain injury, vegetative state, etc) or the need for deep sedation (e.g. if treatment of the critical illness requires deep sedation and neuromuscular blockade, such as in severe ARDS [the acute respiratory distress syndrome])
- COVID-19 positive
- Already receiving OT in the ICU
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)
Enrolled participants in the intervention arm will receive all 3 components of the geriatrics bundle: occupational therapy (in addition to physical therapy) upon enrollment in the ICU, a portable amplifying device upon enrollment in the ICU, and a de-prescribing intervention by the ICU pharmacist (in conjunction with the medical team) upon ICU-to-floor transfer.
|
Enrolled participants in the intervention arm will receive all 3 bundle components: occupational therapy (in addition to physical therapy) upon enrollment in the ICU, a portable amplifying device upon enrollment in the ICU, and a de-prescribing intervention by the ICU pharmacist (in conjunction with the medical team) upon ICU-to-floor transfer.
|
|
No Intervention: Pre-Intervention Group (Control)
Participants in the control arm will be enrolled prior to implementation of the geriatrics bundle to gather preliminary data about the secondary outcomes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of Bundle Delivery
Time Frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
Feasibility of bundle delivery will be measured by review of electronic medical record (EMR) documentation of each bundle component and a daily-check in with the patient and team.
We will determine the proportion of eligible patients receiving each component as well as delivery of the overall bundle.
A feasibility threshold of 70% will be used for the individual bundle components, as well as the combined bundle.
|
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
|
Acceptability of Bundle Delivery
Time Frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
Acceptability of the bundle among providers will be assessed with a survey using a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5, where 5 indicates that participants strongly agree the bundle is completely acceptable for use in its current form and are comfortable using it).
|
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
|
Barriers and Facilitators to Bundle Implementation
Time Frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
Barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation will be assessed using qualitative methods.
Separate focus groups were conducted with members of each health care discipline.
Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed.
Content analysis was then used to identify barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation.
|
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delirium Assessed Using Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU)
Time Frame: during hospitalization, up to 128 days
|
Incident delirium as measured by the Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU). The CHART-DEL-ICU is a validated delirium detection tool for use in critically ill older adults. Charts were manually reviewed and assigned a level of confidence in the detection of delirium for the hospitalization: Level of confidence in detection of delirium
|
during hospitalization, up to 128 days
|
|
Mobility Level - Highest Level
Time Frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets.
This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility.
Presented is the highest score by participants during the hospitalization period.
|
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
|
Mobility Level - Level at Discharge
Time Frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets.
This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility.
Presented is the participant score at discharge.
|
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
|
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
Manual muscle testing via the 6-point MRC system: Strength in each of 12 muscle groups is assessed via a 6-point system, in which a score of 0=no contraction, 1=flicker of a contraction, 2=active movement with gravity eliminated, 3=active movement against gravity, 4=active movement against gravity and resistance, 5= normal power.
The highest possible score is 60, which would indicate maximum muscle strength.
|
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
|
|
30-day Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: 30 days after hospital discharge
|
Participants will be asked whether they were independently able to complete a series of functional activities, including activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and mobility activity.
Functional activities included seven basic activities of daily living (eating, dressing, bathing, toileting, grooming, getting in and out of a chair, walking around indoors); five instrumental activities of daily living (doing housework, going shopping, preparing a meal, taking medications, managing finances); and three mobility activities (walking a quarter of a mile, climbing stairs, and lifting or carrying heavy objects).
A higher count of activities indicates less disability.
|
30 days after hospital discharge
|
|
Number of Participants With Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days after hospital discharge
|
Participants will be asked if they were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of hospital.
The electronic medical record will also be reviewed for readmissions.
|
30 days after hospital discharge
|
|
Number of Participants That Reported Use and Perceived Benefit of Amplifying Device After Hospital Discharge
Time Frame: 30 days after hospital discharge
|
Participants will be asked whether they are still using the portable amplifying device after hospital discharge and whether they perceive benefit from its use.
Presented are the qualitative responses summarized as frequencies.
|
30 days after hospital discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lauren Ferrante, MD, MHS, Yale University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2000029410
- P30AG021342 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.