Comparison of Surgery and Active Surveillance in the Treatment of Bosniak III Renal Cysts

February 16, 2021 updated by: Harry Nisén, Helsinki University Central Hospital

A Prospective Multicenter Trial Comparing Surgery Versus Active Surveillance In Patients With Bosniak 3 Renal Cystic Masses, A NoRenCa And FinnKidney Study

The incidence of renal cysts is rising due to increased abdominal imaging. Renal complicated cysts have been traditionally classified according to the Bosniak classification, which distinguishes cystic masses by specific features of walls and septa. The categories I and II are benign and class IIF most probably benign but needs a short radiological follow-up. Categories III and IV have been traditionally operated due to the increased risk of renal cell carcinoma. However, recently published studies show that approximately 50% of the operated Bosniak III cystic masses are benign, which means that half of the cases are overtreated by surgery. It has also been shown that surgical pathology of stable Bosniak IIF cysts is malignant in less than 1%, while the cysts, which are upgraded to higher Bosniak classes will show malignant surgical pathology in 85%. So far, there is lack of prospective data on active surveillance in Bosniak III cystic masses.

The aim of the study is to compare active surveillance and surgery in patients with Bosniak III renal cystic masses. Patients will be randomized in active surveillance or immediate surgical excision of a cystic mass. In the active surveillance group, patients are followed according to the study protocol for 10 years and treated with delayed surgery if the cystic mass upgrades into Bosniak IV/solid, becomes symptomatic or grows over a preclassified threshold. The primary objective is to compare surgical pathology between patients treated with immediate surgery versus delayed surgery.

According to recent retrospective data, active surveillance of Bosniak III cystic masses is reasonable and oncologically safe. Therefore a prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to get high level evidence to support a change in the treatment strategy. The study may significantly reduce unnecessary operations performed in patients with Bosniak III cystic masses.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A sporadic single CM of Bosniak 3 according to the Bosniak Classification v.2019 is diagnosed with CT or MRI
  • Maximal diameter of CM 10-70 mm
  • Age ≥50 years
  • ECOG performance status <2
  • Life expectancy ≥5 years
  • Patient is fit to undergo surgery and AS.
  • Patient understands a national language or English
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Genetic syndromes associated with RCC
  • Previously or simultaneously diagnosed and pathologically verified RCC
  • Previously or simultaneously radiographically identified solid mass or CM of Bosniak 3/4 with diameter ≥10mm
  • The target CM of Bosniak 3 has progressed in sequential imaging from Bosniak 1-2F
  • Presence of radiographic findings which are suspect for nodal or distant metastatic disease
  • Symptomatic CM
  • Kidney insufficiency (GFR<55 ml/min/1,73m2)
  • Patients who have contraindications for both CT and MRI imaging. . Anatomically solitary kidney

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Immediate surgery
Patients undergo excision of a renal mass by partial or radical nephrectomy and will be followed by UISS risk classification.
Procedure: Immediate surgery
Partial or radical nephrectomy is performed as treatment of Bosniak 3 cystic mass
Active Comparator: Active surveillance
Patients enter active surveillance protocol. Delayed surgery on active surveillance will be recommended if progression from Bosniak 3 to 4 or a solid mass is noted on imaging by radiologist
Procedure: Delayed surgery
Delayed surgery is performed if cystic mass radiologically upgrades into Bosniak 4 or solid mass in the active surveillance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Malignancy rate in surgical pathology
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of surgery, assessed up to 120 months
From date of randomization until the date of surgery, assessed up to 120 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cancer specific survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of death due to renal cancer, assessed up to 120 months
From date of randomization until the date of death due to renal cancer, assessed up to 120 months
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 120 months
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 120 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 120 months
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 120 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Helsinki University Central Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Harry Nisén, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 11, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 11, 2036

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HUS/1556/2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All IPD that underlie results in a publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting 6 months after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests are reviewed by the steering committee.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trials on Immediate surgery

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings