Comparision of Clinical Efficacy of Immediate Implants With T-PRF and Bone-graft Versus PRF and Bone-graft

Comparing The Effectiveness Of T-PRF And PRF With Bone-Graft[DMBM]TM Around Immediate Implants - A RANDOMISED CONTROL TRIAL

The normal architecture of the alveolar process is altered by periodontitis, which also causes the loss of alveolar bone surrounding the teeth. Untreated periodontitis may cause teeth to become mobile and leads to loss of teeth.

In such cases, one of the treatment modalities is extraction of the tooth and placement of immediate implant which reduces the waiting period. And due to the resorption of alveolar ridge the bone graft will be used along with T-PRF and PRF.

So this study aims at the placement of immediate implants along with T-PRF with bone graft and PRF with bone graft.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dental implants have become more common treatment for replacing missing teeth and aim to improve chewing efficiency, physical health and esthetic. And their will be resorption of alveolar process due to periodontitis . In such compromised cases, to achieve bone augmentation around immediately placed implants a new modality of using platelet rich fibrin (PRF) along with graft material has gained considerable interest.

Successful clinical results have been reported with L-PRF, but some physicians worry about a possible health hazard with glass-evacuated blood collection tubes with silica activators. O'Connell described the unavoidable silica contact. The silica particles in the tube, although dense enough to sediment with the red blood cells, are small enough for a fraction to remain colloidally suspended in the buffy coat, fibrin, and platelet-poor plasma layers therefore, these particles might reach the patient when the product is used for treatment.

Recently use of titanium tubes in the preparation of PRF showed more polymerized fibrin formation with longer resorption in tissues as titanium seems to be more effective in activating platelets than silica and also eliminates the possible silica contamination.

The use of T-PRF(Titanium PRF) along with xenograft creates a block graft with high concentrated growth factors, platelets and leucocytes which enhance development of bone and eliminates the possible silica contamination.

Hence, the aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of T-PRF with xenograft [DMBM] and PRF with xenograft [DMBM] around immediate implants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Karnataka
      • Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 562157
        • Krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients between 18-55 years of age.
  2. Presence of non-restorable teeth (maxillary or mandibular) due to trauma, decayed, mobility, root resorption, root stumps, root fracture, over retained deciduous tooth, endodontic or periodontal failure in whom immediate implants can be placed.
  3. Good oral hygiene.
  4. Good patient compliance.
  5. Class I extraction socket defects according to modified Elian et al 2021.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systemic complications (uncontrolled diabetes and severe cardiovascular or infectious diseases).
  2. Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy.
  3. Patients who are psychologically unable to participate.
  4. Pregnant and lactating participants with bone diseases
  5. Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  6. Alcohol or drug abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: in 10 sites immediate implant will be placed along with T-PRF and xenograft
Immediate implant is placed along with T-PRF and xenograft.

A mucoperiosteal flap will be raised and atraumatic extraction will be done. An immediate implant with T-PRF and xenograft will be placed according to the standard protocol.

The surgical wound closure will be coapted with mattress and single interrupted sutures

Active Comparator: in 10 sites immediate implants will be placed with PRF and xenograft
Immediate implant is placed along with PRF and xenograft as control

A mucoperiosteal flap will be raised and atraumatic extraction will be done. An immediate implant with PRF and xenograft will be placed according to the standard protocol .

The surgical wound closure will be coapted with mattress and single interrupted sutures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal Bone Level Using RVG and Grid.
Time Frame: Baseline , 3 months , 9 months
Marginal bone level measured .
Baseline , 3 months , 9 months
Soft tissue healing
Time Frame: Baseline ,3 months , 9 months
Soft tissue healing will be assessed using Wachtel-et-al 2009 classification
Baseline ,3 months , 9 months
Bone fill using RVG with grid
Time Frame: 3 months , 9 months
Measuring the Bone fill by formula Linear bone growth/depth of original bone defect
3 months , 9 months
Bone dimensions using CBCT
Time Frame: 9 months
Extent of bone dimensions is measured through CBCT
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 02_D012_00041

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual Participant Data will not be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implants

Clinical Trials on Immediate implant surgery with T-PRF and xenograft

Subscribe