Influence of Chemotherapy on Postural Control in Women With Cancer

May 4, 2023 updated by: Aline Reinmann

Influence of Chemotherapy on Postural Control and Quality of Life in Women With Gynaecological Cancer: a Prospective Observational Study

The aim of this study is to understand the strategies for adapting postural control in patients who have received chemotherapy treatment for gynaecological cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Chemotherapy can cause many side effects, including peripheral neuropathies. Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathies (CIPN) are primarily sensory impairments that can alter the signals for somatosensory feedback and thus affect the postural control in the standing position. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy and peripheral neuropathies on postural control in the standing position. As balance maintenance is a complex construct involving different systems, this study will evaluate maintenance strategies during sensory disturbances in order to better understand post-chemotherapy coping strategies. These sensory disturbances concern vision (eyes closed) and the alteration of the somatosensory system (foam under the feet and vibration system). In addition, this study will evaluate balance in double task situations and dynamic stability. Given the consequent impact of chemotherapy and peripheral neuropathies on quality of life, a quality of life questionnaire will also be administered.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
        • Geneva University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of 31 women between the ages of 18 and 65 consulting at the University Hospitals for their oncological disease.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Women

  • between 18 and 65 years;
  • with a gynaecological cancer about to start chemotherapy known to be neurotoxic (paclitaxel, docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or paclitaxel-carboplatin);
  • able to stand upright for 30 s on a flat surface without assistance;
  • able to provide written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Women

  • with pre-existing vestibular, uncorrectable visual, or somatosensory disorders or other pathologies altering postural control that would influence testing;
  • with exposure to known neurotoxic chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel, vinorelbine, trastuzumab-emtansine, eribulin, or paclitaxel-carboplatin) that may have caused previous CIPN;
  • with an inability to perform the test due to poor comprehension of instructions or psychological problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Entire group
The group will be test prior and three months after a neurotoxic chemotherapy for gynecological cancer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline : postural control under various conditions.
Time Frame: Prior and three months after chemotherapy
The postural control will be assessed by a force platform. Three 30-second tests will be performed for each test condition. The test conditions are as follows: eyes open, eyes closed, firm surface, soft surface, with vibrator, without vibrator, with dual task. The test position will be standing with the feet 10 cm apart at heel level and 15 cm apart at hallux level, with the arms along the body, fixing a point on the wall at 0.90 cm. Parameters of center of pressure and strength will be recorded at a frequency of 100 Hertz.
Prior and three months after chemotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline : modifications of postural control according to the conditions tested.
Time Frame: Prior and three months after chemotherapy
The postural control will be assessed by a force platform. Three 30-second tests will be performed for each test condition. The test conditions are as follows: eyes open, eyes closed, firm surface, soft surface, with vibrator, without vibrator, with dual task. The test position will be standing with the feet 10 cm apart at heel level and 15 cm apart at hallux level, with the arms along the body, fixing a point on the wall at 0.90 cm. Parameters of center of pressure and strength will be recorded at a frequency of 100 Hertz.
Prior and three months after chemotherapy
Change from baseline : standing dynamic stability.
Time Frame: Prior and three months after chemotherapy
The standing dynamic stability will be assessed by a force platform with the limits of stability test (LOS). The test position will be standing with the feet 10 cm apart at heel level and 15 cm apart at hallux level, with the arms along the body, fixing a computer at a distance of 0.90 cm. Parameters of center of pressure and strength will be recorded at a frequency of 100 Hertz.
Prior and three months after chemotherapy
Change from baseline : quality of life assessed by the questionnaire Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX).
Time Frame: Prior and three months after chemotherapy
The FACT/GOG-NTX was chosen to assess the quality of life (QoL). This questionnaire assesses physical well-being, family/social well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and other concern. Participants will have to answer the different statements by ticking the box corresponding to what they feel is adequate between 0 (not at all) and 4 (a lot). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 152. The higher the score, the better the QoL.
Prior and three months after chemotherapy
Change from baseline : investigate the association between the severity of CIPN (mild, moderate, severe) and the postural control, dynamic balance and QoL of individuals with gynaecological cancer.
Time Frame: Prior and three months after chemotherapy
The clinical version of the Total Neuropathy Score will be used to evaluate the presence of peripheral neuropathy. A test of superficial sensitivity, vibration sensitivity, reflexes and strength will be carried out. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 24. A score between 0 and 8 indicates mild peripheral neuropathy, between 9 and 16 a moderate peripheral neuropathy and above 17 a severe neuropathy.
Prior and three months after chemotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Aline Reinmann

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Aline Reinmann, School of Health Sciences Geneva

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 105909
  • 2020-01639 (Registry Identifier: BASEC)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcomes will be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 6 months of study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

At the end of the project the data will be deposited in the Yareta repository developed by the University of Geneva OR in an institutional repository. This choice will ensure that data is archived and shared in accordance with FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse of digital assets).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings