Stimulation Change Effects on Quantitative Sensory Testing in Neuromodulation Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Albany, New York, United States, 12208
- Albany Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Albany Medical Center neurosurgery patients with chronic leg and/or back pain, that have, or are going to have, spinal cord stimulator implantation.
- Patients are >/= 18 years old at the time of enrollment.
- Patients must be: fluent in English; mentally competent; able to read and answer questionnaires; complete pain assessments; and give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients less than 18 years old.
- Patients unable or unwilling to: read and answer questionnaires; complete pain assessments; and give informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Tonic spinal cord stimulation
Patients are programmed with tonic (continuous) spinal cord stimulation for a period of four weeks.
|
A spinal cord stimulator is a surgically implanted device that delivers an electrical signal to a patient's spinal cord to reduce the perception of pain
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Burst spinal cord stimulation
Patients are programmed with burst (intermittent) spinal cord stimulation for a period of four weeks.
|
A spinal cord stimulator is a surgically implanted device that delivers an electrical signal to a patient's spinal cord to reduce the perception of pain
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quantitative Stimulus Testing (QST)-Thermal
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
Thermal stimulus testing - thermal stimulation system is used to record hot and cold sensation and pain thresholds.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
This outcome measurement tool contains 15 descriptive words (11 sensory and 4 affective) used by subjects to describe their pain.
Total number of words chosen is documented
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
This measurement tool assesses functional outcome for 10 conditions in subjects with chronic pain.
Patients select a statement for each condition that most closely resembles their own situation.
Each statement has a score of 0-5, depending on the severity of the particular disability.
Raw scores are calculated into a disability percentage.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
This is a 21 section multiple-choice self-report survey.
Patients select a statement in each section that most closely resembles their own situation.
Each statement has a score of 0-3, depending on the severity of the depressive content.
Raw scores are tallied.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
This is a 13 question survey.
It is used to assess the degree to which patients ruminate on, magnify, and/or amplify their pain symptoms.
Patients rate on a scale of 0-4 (never - all the time) how often they have each of the thoughts listed.
Raw scores are tallied
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
Patients rate, on a scale of 0-10, their pain at it's least, most, and average over the past week.
They also rate their pain "right now" as well as their perception of Global Improvement.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
This survey is used to assess the 'daytime sleepiness' of patients.
Patients rate the likelihood of falling asleep during several daytime scenarios, on a scale of 0-3 (never - very likely).
Raw scores are tallied.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
This survey is designed to assess the nature, severity, and impact of insomnia in adults.
Patients are asked to rate on a scale of 0-4 (no problem - very much a problem) how much of a problem they have with several sleep conditions.
Raw scores are tallied.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Quantitative Stimulus Testing (QST)-Sensitivity
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
Von Frey fibers are used to determine tactile sensitivity.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Quantitative Stimulus Testing (QST)-Pressure
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
An algometer is used to measure pain related to pressure.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
|
Quantitative Stimulus Testing (QST)-Vibration
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
A tuning fork is used to measure sensitivity to vibration.
|
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Julie Pilitsis, MD, PhD, AMC Department of Neurosurgery
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Deer T, Slavin KV, Amirdelfan K, North RB, Burton AW, Yearwood TL, Tavel E, Staats P, Falowski S, Pope J, Justiz R, Fabi AY, Taghva A, Paicius R, Houden T, Wilson D. Success Using Neuromodulation With BURST (SUNBURST) Study: Results From a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Novel Burst Waveform. Neuromodulation. 2018 Jan;21(1):56-66. doi: 10.1111/ner.12698. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
- Hou S, Kemp K, Grabois M. A Systematic Evaluation of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Limb Pain. Neuromodulation. 2016 Jun;19(4):398-405. doi: 10.1111/ner.12440. Epub 2016 May 3.
- De Ridder D, Plazier M, Kamerling N, Menovsky T, Vanneste S. Burst spinal cord stimulation for limb and back pain. World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):642-649.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.040. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Burst 682552
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.