Impact of CBD-Rich Oil on Aversive Memory Reconsolidation

January 3, 2022 updated by: University of Texas at Austin

Impact of Cannabidiol-Rich Hemp Extract Oil on Reconsolidation Disruption of Naturalistic Interoceptive Aversive Memory in Humans

The purpose of this study is to test whether cannabidiol (CBD) rich hemp extract oil can interfere with the reconsolidation (storage) of pathological fear memory in humans.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Preclinical experiments demonstrate that isolated cannabidiol (CBD), the non-psychotomimetic constituent of the Cannabis sativa plant, disrupts reconsolidation of aversive memories conditioned in the laboratory when administered within the memory reconsolidation window (< 6 hrs. post-retrieval) by indirectly activating cannabinoid type-1 (CB1) receptors in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Furthermore, background material (e.g., terpenoids) naturally present in the cannabis plant may also disrupt aversive memory reconsolidation both alone and in concert with CBD. Based on these preclinical findings, we aim to test whether administration of 300mg CBD-rich hemp extract oil following fear reactivation of an aversive interoceptive threat memory can disrupt reconsolidation of naturalistic aversive memories in humans. More specifically, naturalistic interoceptive aversive memories, a form of transdiagnostic fear memory that contributes to the pathogenesis of fear-related disorders such as panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and illness anxiety disorder.

For this proof-of-concept double-blind trial, volunteers (n=96) reporting elevated fears of somatic sensations will be stratified on biological sex and baseline levels of interoceptive fear and randomized to one of three intervention arms: (a). CBD-rich oil administered within the reconsolidation window, (b). Placebo oil administered within the reconsolidation window, or (c). CBD-rich oil administered outside of the reconsolidation window. Change in emotional reactivity to a 35% CO2 challenge from baseline to two-week follow-up will serve as our primary outcome.

Study findings may contribute towards the development of a novel ultra-brief transdiagnostic intervention guided by reconsolidation theory for individuals prone to fear-related psychiatric disorders.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
96

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria include:

  1. Ages 18-65
  2. Fluent in English
  3. Willingness to refrain from all non-study cannabis use during the study period.

Exclusion criteria include:

  1. Insufficient phobicity (<50 on CO2 challenge);
  2. Presence of significant suicidality;
  3. History of psychosis;
  4. Currently receiving exposure-based treatment;
  5. Current substance use disorder;
  6. Unstable psychiatric medication for a psychological condition;
  7. Medical conditions contraindicating CO2 inhalation (e.g., cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, asthma, lung fibrosis, high blood pressure, epilepsy, or stroke);
  8. Any medical problems (e.g., liver or renal abnormalities) or medication use that would preclude ingesting CBD oil, including but not limited to currently taking blood thinners (e.g., Warfarin and some anti-epileptic medications);
  9. History of an adverse reaction to CBD oil or other CBD products,
  10. Coconut allergy (coconut oil is the carrier oil for CBD-rich extract)

(l) Regular cannabis use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CBD-WR
  • 300 mg CBD-rich hemp extract oil administered within the reconsolidation window.
  • The timing of CBD-rich oil administration is based on preclinical studies demonstrating that CBD's disruptive effects on reconsolidation procedurally depend on timing pharmacological administration to be within the memory reconsolidation window (< 6 hrs. post-retrieval).
  • Thus, immediately after the 35% CO2 interoceptive memory reactivation procedure and associated measures (see measures), participants will be asked to take a single 300mg CBD-rich oral dose of a hemp-derived oil formulation.
Behavioral: Interoceptive Aversive Memory Reactivation
In order to reactivate interoceptive aversive memory, participants will be asked to breathe a medical grade 35% CO2/65% O2 gas mixture which produces somatic perturbations. The 35% CO2 challenge is a widely used and safe symptom induction technique that has been utilized in our laboratory in several experiments. Participants will be informed that breathing the gas is safe, but that it will likely cause changes in their physical sensations. Participants will specifically be asked to breathe the gas mixture normally with their mouth open through an oxygen mask for 10 seconds.
Dietary supplement: Cannabidiol (CBD)-Rich Broad Spectrum Hemp Extract Oil
300mg CBD-rich hemp-derived formulation in MCT coconut oil.
Placebo Comparator: PBO-WR
  • Placebo administered within the reconsolidation window.
  • Immediately after the 35% CO2 interoceptive memory reactivation procedure and associated measures (see measures), participants will be asked to take a single dose of an MCT coconut oil placebo solution.
Behavioral: Interoceptive Aversive Memory Reactivation
In order to reactivate interoceptive aversive memory, participants will be asked to breathe a medical grade 35% CO2/65% O2 gas mixture which produces somatic perturbations. The 35% CO2 challenge is a widely used and safe symptom induction technique that has been utilized in our laboratory in several experiments. Participants will be informed that breathing the gas is safe, but that it will likely cause changes in their physical sensations. Participants will specifically be asked to breathe the gas mixture normally with their mouth open through an oxygen mask for 10 seconds.
Dietary supplement: Placebo Oil
3ml oral dose of MCT coconut oil.
Active Comparator: CBD-OR
  • CBD-rich hemp extract oil administered outside of the reconsolidation window.
  • Participants will be asked to take a single 300mg oral dose of CBD-rich oil approximately 24 hrs after the initial 35% CO2 interoceptive memory reactivation challenge.
  • Thus, CBD will be administered well beyond the critical period for memory reconsolidation. The inclusion of this third arm provides a more robust test of the specific reconsolidation theory-based study hypotheses and aids in controlling for any nonspecific possible anxiolytic effects of CBD.
Behavioral: Interoceptive Aversive Memory Reactivation
In order to reactivate interoceptive aversive memory, participants will be asked to breathe a medical grade 35% CO2/65% O2 gas mixture which produces somatic perturbations. The 35% CO2 challenge is a widely used and safe symptom induction technique that has been utilized in our laboratory in several experiments. Participants will be informed that breathing the gas is safe, but that it will likely cause changes in their physical sensations. Participants will specifically be asked to breathe the gas mixture normally with their mouth open through an oxygen mask for 10 seconds.
Dietary supplement: Cannabidiol (CBD)-Rich Broad Spectrum Hemp Extract Oil
300mg CBD-rich hemp-derived formulation in MCT coconut oil.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CO2 Emotional Reactivity
Time Frame: Two-week follow-up
Self-reported peak-distress (range: 0-100), defined as the highest level of distress experienced at any point during the 35% CO2 challenge completed at the two-week follow-up assessment, adjusting for baseline rating (immediately after the 35% CO2 challenge, but before receiving either immediate CBD/placebo or delayed CBD).
Two-week follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CO2 Emotional Distress Recovery Trajectory
Time Frame: Two-week follow-up
Participants will be asked to rate their current distress level (range: 0-100) every minute for five consecutive minutes after the CO2 inhalation (recovery phase). Change in CO2 emotional distress recovery trajectory from baseline to the two-week follow will serve as a secondary continuous index of emotional reactivity to somatic cues.
Two-week follow-up
Short Scale Anxiety Sensitivity Index (SASSI)
Time Frame: Two-week
The 5-item SSASI is a self-report instrument designed to measure the transdiagnostic construct of anxiety sensitivity, defined as a fear of anxiety and arousal-related sensations. Change on the SSASI from baseline to the two-week follow-up will serve as a secondary outcome measure.
Two-week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Texas at Austin

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael J. Telch, PhD, University of Texas at Austin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 3, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-07-0141

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety and Fear

Clinical Trials on Interoceptive Aversive Memory Reactivation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings