Impact of CBD-Rich Oil on Aversive Memory Reconsolidation

January 3, 2022 updated by: University of Texas at Austin

Impact of Cannabidiol-Rich Hemp Extract Oil on Reconsolidation Disruption of Naturalistic Interoceptive Aversive Memory in Humans

The purpose of this study is to test whether cannabidiol (CBD) rich hemp extract oil can interfere with the reconsolidation (storage) of pathological fear memory in humans.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Preclinical experiments demonstrate that isolated cannabidiol (CBD), the non-psychotomimetic constituent of the Cannabis sativa plant, disrupts reconsolidation of aversive memories conditioned in the laboratory when administered within the memory reconsolidation window (< 6 hrs. post-retrieval) by indirectly activating cannabinoid type-1 (CB1) receptors in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Furthermore, background material (e.g., terpenoids) naturally present in the cannabis plant may also disrupt aversive memory reconsolidation both alone and in concert with CBD. Based on these preclinical findings, we aim to test whether administration of 300mg CBD-rich hemp extract oil following fear reactivation of an aversive interoceptive threat memory can disrupt reconsolidation of naturalistic aversive memories in humans. More specifically, naturalistic interoceptive aversive memories, a form of transdiagnostic fear memory that contributes to the pathogenesis of fear-related disorders such as panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and illness anxiety disorder.

For this proof-of-concept double-blind trial, volunteers (n=96) reporting elevated fears of somatic sensations will be stratified on biological sex and baseline levels of interoceptive fear and randomized to one of three intervention arms: (a). CBD-rich oil administered within the reconsolidation window, (b). Placebo oil administered within the reconsolidation window, or (c). CBD-rich oil administered outside of the reconsolidation window. Change in emotional reactivity to a 35% CO2 challenge from baseline to two-week follow-up will serve as our primary outcome.

Study findings may contribute towards the development of a novel ultra-brief transdiagnostic intervention guided by reconsolidation theory for individuals prone to fear-related psychiatric disorders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria include:

  1. Ages 18-65
  2. Fluent in English
  3. Willingness to refrain from all non-study cannabis use during the study period.

Exclusion criteria include:

  1. Insufficient phobicity (<50 on CO2 challenge);
  2. Presence of significant suicidality;
  3. History of psychosis;
  4. Currently receiving exposure-based treatment;
  5. Current substance use disorder;
  6. Unstable psychiatric medication for a psychological condition;
  7. Medical conditions contraindicating CO2 inhalation (e.g., cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, asthma, lung fibrosis, high blood pressure, epilepsy, or stroke);
  8. Any medical problems (e.g., liver or renal abnormalities) or medication use that would preclude ingesting CBD oil, including but not limited to currently taking blood thinners (e.g., Warfarin and some anti-epileptic medications);
  9. History of an adverse reaction to CBD oil or other CBD products,
  10. Coconut allergy (coconut oil is the carrier oil for CBD-rich extract)

(l) Regular cannabis use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CBD-WR
  • 300 mg CBD-rich hemp extract oil administered within the reconsolidation window.
  • The timing of CBD-rich oil administration is based on preclinical studies demonstrating that CBD's disruptive effects on reconsolidation procedurally depend on timing pharmacological administration to be within the memory reconsolidation window (< 6 hrs. post-retrieval).
  • Thus, immediately after the 35% CO2 interoceptive memory reactivation procedure and associated measures (see measures), participants will be asked to take a single 300mg CBD-rich oral dose of a hemp-derived oil formulation.
In order to reactivate interoceptive aversive memory, participants will be asked to breathe a medical grade 35% CO2/65% O2 gas mixture which produces somatic perturbations. The 35% CO2 challenge is a widely used and safe symptom induction technique that has been utilized in our laboratory in several experiments. Participants will be informed that breathing the gas is safe, but that it will likely cause changes in their physical sensations. Participants will specifically be asked to breathe the gas mixture normally with their mouth open through an oxygen mask for 10 seconds.
300mg CBD-rich hemp-derived formulation in MCT coconut oil.
Placebo Comparator: PBO-WR
  • Placebo administered within the reconsolidation window.
  • Immediately after the 35% CO2 interoceptive memory reactivation procedure and associated measures (see measures), participants will be asked to take a single dose of an MCT coconut oil placebo solution.
In order to reactivate interoceptive aversive memory, participants will be asked to breathe a medical grade 35% CO2/65% O2 gas mixture which produces somatic perturbations. The 35% CO2 challenge is a widely used and safe symptom induction technique that has been utilized in our laboratory in several experiments. Participants will be informed that breathing the gas is safe, but that it will likely cause changes in their physical sensations. Participants will specifically be asked to breathe the gas mixture normally with their mouth open through an oxygen mask for 10 seconds.
3ml oral dose of MCT coconut oil.
Active Comparator: CBD-OR
  • CBD-rich hemp extract oil administered outside of the reconsolidation window.
  • Participants will be asked to take a single 300mg oral dose of CBD-rich oil approximately 24 hrs after the initial 35% CO2 interoceptive memory reactivation challenge.
  • Thus, CBD will be administered well beyond the critical period for memory reconsolidation. The inclusion of this third arm provides a more robust test of the specific reconsolidation theory-based study hypotheses and aids in controlling for any nonspecific possible anxiolytic effects of CBD.
In order to reactivate interoceptive aversive memory, participants will be asked to breathe a medical grade 35% CO2/65% O2 gas mixture which produces somatic perturbations. The 35% CO2 challenge is a widely used and safe symptom induction technique that has been utilized in our laboratory in several experiments. Participants will be informed that breathing the gas is safe, but that it will likely cause changes in their physical sensations. Participants will specifically be asked to breathe the gas mixture normally with their mouth open through an oxygen mask for 10 seconds.
300mg CBD-rich hemp-derived formulation in MCT coconut oil.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CO2 Emotional Reactivity
Time Frame: Two-week follow-up
Self-reported peak-distress (range: 0-100), defined as the highest level of distress experienced at any point during the 35% CO2 challenge completed at the two-week follow-up assessment, adjusting for baseline rating (immediately after the 35% CO2 challenge, but before receiving either immediate CBD/placebo or delayed CBD).
Two-week follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CO2 Emotional Distress Recovery Trajectory
Time Frame: Two-week follow-up
Participants will be asked to rate their current distress level (range: 0-100) every minute for five consecutive minutes after the CO2 inhalation (recovery phase). Change in CO2 emotional distress recovery trajectory from baseline to the two-week follow will serve as a secondary continuous index of emotional reactivity to somatic cues.
Two-week follow-up
Short Scale Anxiety Sensitivity Index (SASSI)
Time Frame: Two-week
The 5-item SSASI is a self-report instrument designed to measure the transdiagnostic construct of anxiety sensitivity, defined as a fear of anxiety and arousal-related sensations. Change on the SSASI from baseline to the two-week follow-up will serve as a secondary outcome measure.
Two-week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael J. Telch, PhD, University of Texas at Austin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-07-0141

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety and Fear

Clinical Trials on Interoceptive Aversive Memory Reactivation

Subscribe