The Impact of an Evidence-Informed Spinal Cord Injury Activities of Daily Living Educational Manual (SADLeM)
The Impact of an Evidence-Informed Spinal Cord Injury Activities of Daily Living Educational Manual (SADL-eM): Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Moussa Abu Mostafa, Master
- Phone Number: 0597401091
- Email: moussaabumostafa@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Gaza Strip
-
Gaza City, Gaza Strip, Palestinian Territory, occupied, 1051
- Hamad Rehabilitation Hospital
-
Khan Yunis, Gaza Strip, Palestinian Territory, occupied
- ElAmal Rehabilitation Hospital
-
Zahra City, Gaza Strip, Palestinian Territory, occupied, 1051
- ElWafa Rehabilitation Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed SCI diagnosis by computed tomography or magnetic resonance report.
- ASIA: A, B, and C
- Age between 18 and 65 years old.
- Stable medical condition.
- Time elapsed after SCI is not more than 6 months.
- Minimum time of stay in the inpatient rehabilitation unit is six weeks.
- Active involvement in the rehabilitation program.
- Sufficient comprehension (read/write) of the Arabic language.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unconfirmed diagnosis.
- Patients who have communication and/or cognitive disorders such as global aphasia and memory deficit.
- Patients with a disturbed level of awareness such as coma or lethargy.
- Time elapsed since SCI is more than 6 months.
- ASIA: D and E
- Unstable medical condition.
- Patients who have other cause(s) of disability in addition to SCI such as stroke or amputation.
- Age less than 18 or more than 65 years old.
- Time of stay in the inpatient rehabilitation unit is less than six weeks.
- Inactive involvement in the rehabilitation program.
- Patients with progressive disease or a psychiatric condition that would interfere with active participation in the rehabilitation programs.
- Patients with cardiovascular contraindications.
- Persons who become walking ambulatory during the inpatient period.
- Persons with complete tetraplegia C4 or above.
- Persons on a mechanical ventilator.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SADL-eM & conventional therapy
Patients with SCI treated in an inpatient rehabilitation setting who receive a copy of the SADL-eM in addition to conventional therapy.
|
The SADL-eM includes three elements essential to the intervention, namely: knowledge, skills, and advice.
The manual includes 92 A5 pages with six detailed sections: an Introduction and five chapters: (1) Rehabilitation team, (2) Activities of Daily Living, (3) Assistive devices, (4) Home environment adaptation, and (5) Knowledge guide.
The SADL-eM uses text and illustrative pictures that are carefully selected for contextual relevance.
The manual is simple, easy, and suitable for people with a non-medical background.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Conventional therapy
Patients with SCI treated in an inpatient rehabilitation setting who receive conventional therapy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure-Self Reported (SCIM-SR) baseline assessment
Time Frame: within 3 days of admission
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure-Self Reported is a patient-reported 17-item tool that evaluates the ability of a person with SCI to perform specified activities independently, with assistance, or with assistive devices.
Total score ranges between 0-100, higher scores mean better.
|
within 3 days of admission
|
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure-Self Reported (SCIM-SR) change after six weeks
Time Frame: Six weeks after admission
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure-Self Reported is a patient-reported 17-item tool that evaluates the ability of a person with SCI to perform specified activities independently, with assistance, or with assistive devices.
Total score ranges between 0-100, higher scores mean better.
|
Six weeks after admission
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III) baseline assessment
Time Frame: within 3 days of admission
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III is a 17-task tool that evaluates the ability of a person with SCI to perform specified activities independently, with assistance, or with assistive devices.
It is therapist-reported.
Total score ranges between 0-100, higher scores mean better.
|
within 3 days of admission
|
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III) change after six weeks
Time Frame: Six weeks after admission
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III is a 17-task tool that evaluates the ability of a person with SCI to perform specified activities independently, with assistance, or with assistive devices.
It is therapist-reported.
Total score ranges between 0-100, higher scores mean better.
|
Six weeks after admission
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Moussa Abu Mostafa, Master, Hamad Rehabilitation Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bell ML, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes. Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 18;10:153-157. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S146397. eCollection 2018.
- Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
- Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available.
- Magill N, Knight R, McCrone P, Ismail K, Landau S. A scoping review of the problems and solutions associated with contamination in trials of complex interventions in mental health. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0646-z.
- Bodling, A., Heneghan, M., Walsh, J. C., Yoon, D. P., & Johnstone, B. (2013). The brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality with an irish sample: A factor analysis. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 20(2), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.2.72
- De Las Cuevas C, Penate W. Psychometric properties of the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) in a psychiatric outpatient setting. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 May-Aug;15(2):121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
- DiSilvio B, Virani A, Patel S, Finoli L, Singh A, DuMont T, Cheema T. Institutional COVID-19 Protocols: Focused on Preparation, Safety, and Care Consolidation. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2020 Oct/Dec;43(4):413-427. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000327.
- Fekete C, Eriks-Hoogland I, Baumberger M, Catz A, Itzkovich M, Luthi H, Post MW, von Elm E, Wyss A, Brinkhof MW. Development and validation of a self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III). Spinal Cord. 2013 Jan;51(1):40-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.87. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
- Krueger C, Tian L. A comparison of the general linear mixed model and repeated measures ANOVA using a dataset with multiple missing data points. Biol Res Nurs. 2004 Oct;6(2):151-7. doi: 10.1177/1099800404267682.
- Fetzer Institute, N. I. on A. W. G. (2003). Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/ Spirituality for Use in Health Research: A Report of the Fetzer Institute/ National Institute on Aging Working Group.
- Glass CA, Tesio L, Itzkovich M, Soni BM, Silva P, Mecci M, Chadwick R, el Masry W, Osman A, Savic G, Gardner B, Bergstrom E, Catz A. Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: applicability to the UK spinal cord injured population. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Sep;41(9):723-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0398.
- Itzkovich M, Shefler H, Front L, Gur-Pollack R, Elkayam K, Bluvshtein V, Gelernter I, Catz A. SCIM III (Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III): reliability of assessment by interview and comparison with assessment by observation. Spinal Cord. 2018 Jan;56(1):46-51. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.97. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
- Mostafa, M. A., Plastow, A. N., and Savin-Baden, M. (2019). The effectiveness of spinal cord injury ADL inpatient education on rehabilitation outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83,(1), 15-28. DOI: 10.1177/0308022619879019
- Mostafa, M. A., Plastow, A. N., and Savin-Baden, M. (2020). Developing of an Evidence-Informed Activities of Daily Living Educational Manual. Manuscript submitted for publication
- Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T. and Hungler, B. P. (2001). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisals, and Utilization. Fifth edition.: Lippincott, USA.
- Quittner, A. L., Espelage, D. L., Ievers-Landis, C., & Drotar, D. (2000). Measuring adherence to medical treatments in childhood chronic illness: Considering multiple methods and sources of information. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 7(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009545319673
- Wasson JH. Practice Standards for Effective Telemedicine in Chronic Care Management After COVID-19. J Ambul Care Manage. 2020 Oct/Dec;43(4):323-325. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000355. No abstract available.
- Anderson K, Aito S, Atkins M, Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, Curt A, Ditunno J, Glass C, Marino R, Marshall R, Mulcahey MJ, Post M, Savic G, Scivoletto G, Catz A; Functional Recovery Outcome Measures Work Group. Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(2):133-44. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11760704.
- Chou HK, Lin IC, Woung LC, Tsai MT. An empirical study on outpatients' health education needs and the effectiveness of e-learning. Health Promot Pract. 2012 Jan;13(1):133-9. doi: 10.1177/1524839910385896. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
- Letts L, Martin Ginis KA, Faulkner G, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Gorczynski P. Preferred methods and messengers for delivering physical activity information to people with spinal cord injury: a focus group study. Rehabil Psychol. 2011 May;56(2):128-37. doi: 10.1037/a0023624.
- May L, Day R, Warren S. Evaluation of patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: knowledge, problem-solving and perceived importance. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Apr 15;28(7):405-13. doi: 10.1080/09638280500192439.
- Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Molinari M. The spinal cord independence measure: how much change is clinically significant for spinal cord injury subjects. Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Oct;35(21):1808-13. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.756942. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
- Shepherd JD, Badger-Brown KM, Legassic MS, Walia S, Wolfe DL. SCI-U: e-learning for patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Sep;35(5):319-29. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000044.
- Wirth B, van Hedel HJ, Kometer B, Dietz V, Curt A. Changes in activity after a complete spinal cord injury as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II). Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):279-87. Erratum In: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):769.
- Abu Mostafa M, Plastow NA, Savin-Baden M, Ayele B. The Impact of an Evidence-Informed Spinal Cord Injury Activities of Daily Living Education Manual (SADL-eM): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 22;11(7):e30611. doi: 10.2196/30611.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 972225221
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.