Individualized Induction Therapy for Non-elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Adverse Risk Features

November 8, 2021 updated by: The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

The Clinical Study of Individualized Induction Therapy for Non-elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Adverse Risk Features Guided by Rapid Screening With FISH and NGS

Individualized induction therapy will be applied to the non-elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with adverse genetic risk features guided by rapid screening with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), such as the combination of Venetoclax plus decitabine, and Sorafenib for patients with high (FMS)-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) allelic ratio. This study aims to improve induction therapy for non-elderly AML patients with adverse genetic risk features, reduce treatment-related complications, and improve overall survival.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The non-elderly AML patients who meet the adverse risk group defined as 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification, are more likely to be refractory to intensive induction and have low rates of long-term survival. Venetoclax (drug name) plus decitabine or azacitidine showed tolerable safety and favorable overall response rate (ORR )(complete remission (CR)+CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate: 67%) in elderly AML patients. In addition, combination therapy with sorafenib, cytarabine and idarubicin was able to induce a high CR rate in non-elderly AML patients with FLT3 mutations and a 1-year probability of survival of 74%. The fast next-generation sequencing together with FISH can identify the adverse genetic risk features in AML patients within 72 hours. Individualized induction therapy will be applied to the non-elderly AML patients with adverse genetic risk features guided by rapid screening with FISH and NGS, such as the combination of venetoclax plus decitabine, and Sorafenib for patients with high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio. This study aims to improve induction therapy for non-elderly AML patients with adverse genetic risk features, reduce treatment-related complications, and improve overall survival.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215000
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 59 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female, 59 > =Age (years) >= 18;
  2. Newly diagnosed as AML patients according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification;
  3. AML patients meet the adverse risk group according to 2017 European Leukemia Net risk stratification;
  4. Patients have not received prior therapy for AML (except HU);
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status of 0,1, 2 ;
  6. Liver function: Total bilirubin ≦3 upper limit of normal (ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≦3 ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT)≦3 ULN(except extramedullary infiltration of leukemia)
  7. Renal function：Ccr ≧30 ml/min;
  8. Patients who sign the informed consent must have the ability to understand and be willing to participate in the study and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute promyeloid leukemia；
  2. AML with central nervous system (CNS) infiltration；
  3. Patients have received prior hypomethylating agents (HMA) therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and progressed to AML；
  4. HIV infection;
  5. Patients with severe heart failure (grade 3-4) ;
  6. Evidence of other clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s) including, but not limited to: a) Uncontrolled and/or active systemic infection (viral, bacterial or fungal); b) Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C (HCV) requiring treatment. c)An active second cancer that requires treatment within 6 months of study entry
  7. Patients deemed unsuitable for enrolment by the investigator;
  8. Patients willing to receive intensive induction chemotherapy
  9. Female who are pregnant, breast feeding or childbearing potential without a negative urine pregnancy test at screen；
  10. Patients reject to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment regime
combination of venetoclax plus azacitidine, and Sorafenib for patients with high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio
Drug: venetoclax combined with decitabine
combination of venetoclax plus decitabine, and sorafenib for patients with high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio. (On day 1 of cycle 1, decitabine 20 mg/m2 will be given intravenously, and will continue for 5 days. Simultaneously the patient will start out with Venetoclax 100mg and progress to 400mg until the 28 day cycle is finished. For patients with high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio, sorafenib was administered at a dose of 400mg orally twice daily, on days 3 through 28.
Other Names:
  • combination of venetoclax plus decitabine with or without sorafenib

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CR/CRi/morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS)
Time Frame: Study start date to study end date, or death, whichever comes first, up to 4 years
Complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery/Morphologic Leukemia Free State（after one cycle or two cycles of induction therapy）
Study start date to study end date, or death, whichever comes first, up to 4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Event Free Survival(EFS)
Time Frame: Study start date to study end date, or death, whichever comes first, up to 4 years
Event Free Survival
Study start date to study end date, or death, whichever comes first, up to 4 years
Overall Survival(OS)
Time Frame: Study start date to study end date, or death, whichever comes first, up to 4 years
Overall Survival
Study start date to study end date, or death, whichever comes first, up to 4 years
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Study start date to study end date, or death, whichever comes first, up to 4 years
infection, blood transfusion, and other toxicity
Study start date to study end date, or death, whichever comes first, up to 4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SZ-AML01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings