Phase II RCT of an Internet-adaptation of Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (iCALM) (iCALM)

July 14, 2025 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

The Online Adaptation of Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (iCALM): A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial

iCALM is an online adaptation of a brief, individual, psychosocial intervention called Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) in patients with advanced and metastatic cancer. CALM has been shown to reduce or prevent depression in this population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate iCALM with regards to its acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy in reducing or preventing psychological distress and improving psychological well-being in patients with advanced cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with advanced cancer are at risk for depression due to the disease and to side effects from its treatment. Depression in this population decreases quality of life and adherence to treatment and increases the risk of suicide. Psychotherapy can be effective to treat depression, but most patients affected by cancer and depression do not receive it, due to a lack of tailored therapies or trained clinicians in cancer treatment centres or in the community. To address this issue, we developed a novel 3-6 session psychotherapy intervention called Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) to prevent and treat depression in patients with advanced disease. In a large randomized controlled trial (RCT), we demonstrated that CALM reduces or prevents depression in these patients. However, since access to trained clinicians is limited, we will develop an online version of CALM, referred to as iCALM, and test its feasibility and preliminary efficacy. In the present study we will: i) adapt the CALM intervention to its online delivery; and ii) recruit 50 patients at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM), who will be randomized (25 patients per group) to receive either iCALM or usual care. Usual care patients will be offered iCALM at the end of the study on compassionate grounds. Questionnaires assessing intervention satisfaction, depression, death anxiety, and quality of life will be administered at recruitment and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with patients and eCoaches to explore their experience of using iCALM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years of age;
  • ability to read and write in English;
  • able to access the internet.
  • not cognitively impaired;
  • able to commit to the required online sessions; and
  • patients at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre with a confirmed or working diagnosis of advanced or metastatic cancer with an expected survival of 12-18 months [stage III or IV lung cancer, any stage of pancreatic cancer, unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, unresectable liver cancer, unresectable ampullary or peri-ampullary cancer or other stage IV (metastatic) GI cancer; stage III or IV ovarian and fallopian tube cancers, or other stage IV gynecological (GYNE) cancer; and stage IV breast, genitourinary (GU), sarcoma, melanoma or endocrine cancers].

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to pass the cognitive screening test (Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test (SOMC) score <20, Katzman et al., 1983); and
  • actively receiving a structured or semi-structured psychotherapy at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: iCALM Intervention Group
iCALM is a brief, online psychotherapeutic intervention for patients with advanced and metastatic cancer. It consists of one introductory module and four therapeutic modules composed of written psychoeducational material, videos, and exercises. The intervention is designed to be completed in 9 weeks.
Behavioral: Internet Adaptation of Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (iCALM)
A online psychotherapy designed for patients with advanced and metastatic cancer.
No Intervention: Care as usual
Participants in the usual care group (UC) will receive routine care. At Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, routine care includes a referral to Psychiatry, Psychology, or Social Work, based on patients' needs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
A reliable and valid 9-item measure for depression. Total PHQ-9 scores may range from 0-27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. This measure will be administered to all participants at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks to assess change over time.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life at the End of Life-Cancer Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
A 14-item modified measure of the QUAL-E designed to assess the quality of life in patient populations nearing the end of life. Total scores may range from 0-70 with higher scores indicating better outcomes. This measure will be administered to all participants at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks to assess change over time.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
Death and Dying Distress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
A validated 15-item scale measuring death anxiety in advanced cancer patients. Total DADDS scores may range from 0 to 75, with higher scores indicating greater death anxiety. This measure will be administered to all participants at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks to assess change over time.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
Experiences in Close Relationships Inventory Modified Short Form Version
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
A reliable and valid 16-item version of the ECR-M-36 that assesses general attachment orientations to close others. It provides sub-scale scores assessing for attachment anxiety (i.e., fear of abandonment) and avoidance (i.e., defensive independence).Total scores on each dimension may range from 0-56 with higher scores indicating poor attachment insecurity. This measure will be administered to all participants at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks to assess change over time.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative Interview
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
A qualitative study employing a grounded theory methodology
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Attitudes towards Psychological Online Interventions
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
A 16-item validated questionnaire that measures participants' acceptance towards POIs across four sub-scales: (1) skepticism and perception of risks, (2) confidence in effectiveness, (3) technologization threat (i.e., reluctance to receive psychological support through online interventions), and (4) accessibility and anonymity benefits of online interventions. Scores on each dimension may range from 0-20, and total scores may range from 0-80 with higher scores indicating greater acceptance towards POIs.This measure will be administered to participants randomized to the iCALM intervention at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks to assess change over time.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
Customer Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
A 8-item scale measuring satisfaction with services and clinical care. Total scores may range from 0-32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with services and clinical care. This measure will be administered to participants randomized to the iCALM intervention at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks to assess change over time.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire-Internet
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
A 14-item measure modified for this study to be applicable for the online delivery of CALM from the Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) and used to evaluate the extent to which patients felt supported by iCALM. Total scores range from 0-56 with higher scores indicating positive attitudes towards the online delivery of iCALM. This measure will be administered to participants randomized to the iCALM intervention at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks to assess change over time.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
Working Alliance Inventory for guided internet interventions
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks
A validated and reliable, 12-item measure used to capture alliance in guided Internet interventions. Total scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes towards Internet interventions. This measure will be administered to participants randomized to the iCALM intervention at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks to assess change over time.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Health Network, Toronto

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Ulm

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Hales, MD, University Health Network, Toronto
  • Principal Investigator: Gary Rodin, MD, University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 14, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19-5167

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings