Evaluating the Cologuard Test for Use in Lynch Syndrome

November 9, 2021 updated by: Rajiv Panikkar, Geisinger Clinic
This study is aiming to enroll 90 patients with genetically confirmed Lynch Syndrome (LS) from Geisinger's High Risk Colorectal Cancer Clinic (HRC). Upon enrollment in the study, a Cologuard test will be ordered and the results will be blinded until data analysis. Patients enrolled in the study will also undergo a colonoscopy as part of their routine HRC visit.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary aim is to perform a pilot study to gain information toward the implementation of a larger prospective study that will compare the performance of Cologuard with the gold-standard colonoscopy in identifying advanced adenomas and colorectal cancers in LS. Data regarding rate of consent, and adherence to the protocol will be recorded. Since patients with known genetic predisposition to cancers tend to view screening tests more positively than the general population, a second aim of the study is to evaluate patient satisfaction with bowel preparation, colonoscopies, and Cologuard testing. Up to 90 individuals with genetically confirmed LS will be recruited via Geisinger's HRC to complete a goal of 90 Cologuard studies. Upon enrollment, Cologuard will be ordered by the study team at no cost to the subject and will be completed according to the standard instructions for use. Results will be securely obtained and blinded until the time of data analysis. Subjects will undergo colonoscopy as part of their routine HRC visit. Results from the colonoscopy (and biopsy as indicated) will be retrieved from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and documented in a research-associated spreadsheet. If repeat colonoscopy is clinically indicated, repeat Cologuard may be completed if the subject meets inclusion criteria.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
        • Geisinger Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients being followed in the HRC with a diagnosis of LS

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients age 18-89
  • Diagnosis of genetically confirmed LS
  • Scheduled for standard of care colonoscopy within 60 days of enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of other inherited genetic disorders that increase risk for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) (Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), Cowden's syndrome, Turcot syndrome, Gardner syndrome, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome)
  • Diagnosis of other inherited Inflammatory bowel disease (i.e. Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis)
  • Others with elevated risk of CRC outside of the inclusion criteria (i.e. ≥2 first-degree relatives who have been diagnosed with CRC without a defined inherited genetic disorder, Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colon Cancer (HNPCC) without genetic confirmation of LS)
  • Participation in any interventional clinical study within the previous 30 days
  • Personal history of CRC not in full remission (5 consecutive cancer-free years)
  • Current active treatment with chemotherapy
  • Treatment with chemotherapy within 12 months prior to consent date

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Cologuard Study Group
Within 60 days of their already scheduled screening colonoscopy, participants will provide a stool sample to be tested by a Cologuard screening test kit. Participants will also complete surveys prior to their colonoscopy as well as post colonoscopy.
Diagnostic test: Cologuard test
Cologuard is a stool-DNA screening test for detecting colon cancer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the feasibility of the Cologuard test for Lynch Syndrome
Time Frame: 3 months
To evaluate the feasibility of Cologuard in a high-risk population, a summary report of the enrollment/consent rate and adherence to the protocol will be provided. Additional analyses comparing the results (given as positive/negative) Cologuard with the gold standard of colonoscopy will be performed using diagnostic tests including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate patient satisfaction with Cologuard
Time Frame: 3 months
To evaluate patient satisfaction of Cologuard the responses to the Geisinger Cologuard Satisfaction Questionnaire will be summarized. The questionnaire is composed of 15 questions. There are two primary questions are "How satisfied are you with the process of using Cologuard which uses a 5 point Likert Scale (Very satisfied to Very Dissatisfied) and "would you recommend Cologuard using a 10 point Likert scale (Not at all likely to Extremely Likely). Other categorical questions are either yes no response or an ordinal response with 4 categories. There are 6 questions that are open text responses to give more details as to why the selected their categorical response. The information gathered in the open responses is qualitative and will be used to provide guidance of approach and protocol for a future study.
3 months
Evaluate health-related quality of life in Lynch Syndrome
Time Frame: 3 months
Assess the results of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) collected at the initial subject contact. Responses will be summarized.
3 months
Evaluate depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months
Assess the results of the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) collected at the time of their High-Risk Clinic Visit. Responses will be summarized.
3 months
Evaluate anxiety symptoms surrounding routine colonoscopy
Time Frame: 3 months
Assess the results of the General Anxiety Disorder - 7 item scale (GAD-7) collected at the initial subject contact and that collected at the completion of their participation. Responses will be summarized
3 months
Evaluate bowel preparation tolerability
Time Frame: 3 months
Assess the results of the Mayo Florida Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire (MFBT-9) collected at the completion of the subject's participation. Responses will be summarized.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Geisinger Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rajiv Panikkar, MD, Geisinger Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-0239

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings