Hypofractionated Pencil-Beam Scanning Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in Recurrent Rectal Cancer (IMPARC)
Hypofractionated Pencil-Beam Scanning Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the Reirradiation of Locoregionally Recurrent Rectal Cancer - IMPARC
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Allen Mo, M.D., Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 314-362-7769
- Email: amo@wustl.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- History of biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum, anus or rectosigmoid junction of any stage now with recurrent disease in the pelvis
- One prior course of radiation therapy to the pelvis for rectal cancer
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- At least 18 years of age
- Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control, abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she must inform her treating physician immediately.
- Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB-approved written informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with pre-existing radiosensitizing conditions, such as connective tissue disorders (i.e. lupus, scleroderma) and genetic mutations (i.e. ataxia-telangiectasia)
- A history of other malignancy with the exception of malignancies for which all treatment was completed at least 2 years before registration and the patient has no evidence of disease, basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that were treated with local resection only, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix. Patients with history of prostate cancer treated without radiotherapy and no evidence of disease are eligible
- More than one prior course of radiation to the pelvis for rectal cancer
- Prior radiation to the pelvis for disease other than rectal cancer
- Tumor in the rectum/colon requiring radiation therapy to the full circumference of the rectum/colon.
- Current treatment with any investigational agents.
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, or unstable angina pectoris
- Pregnant and/or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 14 days of study entry.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Dose Level 1: Hypofractionated Pencil-Beam Scanning Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT)
|
When feasible it is strongly recommended that radiotherapy begin on a Monday
Other Names:
-The device that will administer the IMPT
|
|
Experimental: Dose Level 2: Hypofractionated Pencil-Beam Scanning Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT)
|
When feasible it is strongly recommended that radiotherapy begin on a Monday
Other Names:
-The device that will administer the IMPT
|
|
Experimental: Dose Level 3: Hypofractionated Pencil-Beam Scanning Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT)
|
When feasible it is strongly recommended that radiotherapy begin on a Monday
Other Names:
-The device that will administer the IMPT
|
|
Experimental: Dose Level -1: Hypofractionated Pencil-Beam Scanning Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT)
|
When feasible it is strongly recommended that radiotherapy begin on a Monday
Other Names:
-The device that will administer the IMPT
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Reirradiation Using Hypofractionated IMPT
Time Frame: From start of treatment through 6 months
|
|
From start of treatment through 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Complete Response Rate
Time Frame: Within 6 weeks to 3 months post-completion of radiation therapy (range 7-14 weeks)
|
-DRE, endoscopy, and cross-sectional imaging will be used to measure clinical complete response rate
|
Within 6 weeks to 3 months post-completion of radiation therapy (range 7-14 weeks)
|
|
Median Freedom From Locoregional Progression (FFLP)
Time Frame: Through completion of follow-up (full range 1.81 months-13.87 months)
|
-Defined as time from end of radiation therapy to date of first instance of local or regional tumor progression
|
Through completion of follow-up (full range 1.81 months-13.87 months)
|
|
Median Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Through completion of follow-up (full range 4.4 months to 13.87 months)
|
Defined as time from end of radiation therapy to date that at least 50% of patients died
|
Through completion of follow-up (full range 4.4 months to 13.87 months)
|
|
Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Through completion of follow-up (full range 1.81 months-13.87 months)
|
-Defined as time from end of radiation therapy to the earliest date of locoregional progression, distant progression, or death from any cause
|
Through completion of follow-up (full range 1.81 months-13.87 months)
|
|
Median Change in Quality of Life (QoL) Score as Measured by The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Assessed at pre-treatment (baseline), 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-treatment
|
30 question survey which assesses patient well-being with 5 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, & global health scale.
Scores for each scale range from 0-100.
Higher score for the functional scale & global health represent high functioning, while high score for symptom scale represents high symptomatology.
Median scores were taken for each scale for each dose level and the different between pre-treatment and post-treatment scores were calculated to determine change in score over time.
For functional scales and global health status, negative values represent improved functionality/quality of life, while positive values represent diminished functionality.
For symptom scales, the opposite is true.
If patients did not complete the the survey at each time point, their data was censored.
Data values were averaged prior to 3 months.
Differences were taken between baseline values and the average value calculated of post-RT up to 3 months.
|
Assessed at pre-treatment (baseline), 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-treatment
|
|
Median Change in Quality of Life (QoL) Score as Measured by The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Assessed at pre-treatment (baseline), 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-treatment
|
30 question survey which assesses patient well-being with 5 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, & global health scale.
Scores for each scale range from 0-100.
Higher score for the functional scale & global health represent high functioning, while high score for symptom scale represents high symptomatology.
Median scores were taken for each scale for each dose level and the different between pre-treatment and post-treatment scores were calculated to determine change in score over time.
For functional scales and global health status, negative values represent improved functionality/quality of life, while positive values represent diminished functionality.
For symptom scales, the opposite is true.
If patients did not complete the survey at each time point, their data was censored.
Data values were averaged from 3-12 months.
Differences were taken between baseline values and the average value calculated of post-RT from 3-12 months.
|
Assessed at pre-treatment (baseline), 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-treatment
|
|
Median Change in Quality of Life (QoL) Score as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Colorectal Cancer Module 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29)
Time Frame: Assessed at pre-treatment (baseline), 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-treatment
|
29 question survey which assesses quality of life for patients with colorectal cancer including functional & symptom status.
The survey includes 4 multi-item scales & 19 single-item scales.
Scores are linearly transformed to provide a score from 0-100.
A high score for functional scales represents high level of functioning, while a high score for symptom scale represents high level of symptoms.
Median scores were taken for each scale & the difference between baseline & varying time points was reported.
Negative value represents improved function for a functional scale item, & worsening symptoms for symptom scale items.
Positive values represent the converse.
If patients did not complete the survey at each time point, their data was censored.
Data values were averaged prior to 3 months.
Differences were taken between pre-treatment (baseline) values and the average value calculated of post-RT up to 3 months.
|
Assessed at pre-treatment (baseline), 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-treatment
|
|
Median Change in Quality of Life (QoL) Score as Measured by the by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Colorectal Cancer Module 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29)
Time Frame: Assessed at pre-treatment (baseline), 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-treatment
|
29 question survey which assesses quality of life for patients with colorectal cancer including functional & symptom status.
The survey includes 4 multi-item scales & 19 single-item scales.
Scores are linearly transformed to provide a score from 0-100.
A high score for functional scales represents high level of functioning, while a high score for symptom scale represents high level of symptoms.
Median scores were taken for each scale & the difference between baseline & varying time points was reported.
Negative value represents improved function for a functional scale item, & worsening symptoms for symptom scale items.
Positive values represent the converse.
If patients did not complete the survey at each time point, their data was censored.
Data values were averaged from 3-12 months.
Differences were taken between baseline values and the average value calculated of post-RT from 3-12 months
|
Assessed at pre-treatment (baseline), 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-treatment
|
|
Frequency of Treatment-related Acute Adverse Events as Measured by CTCAE v 5.0
Time Frame: From start of treatment through 3 months after completion of radiation therapy (estimated to be 3 months and 1 week)
|
From start of treatment through 3 months after completion of radiation therapy (estimated to be 3 months and 1 week)
|
|
|
Frequency of Treatment-related Late Adverse Events as Measured by CTCAE v 5.0
Time Frame: From 3 month post-completion of radiation therapy to 12 months post-completion of radiation therapy
|
From 3 month post-completion of radiation therapy to 12 months post-completion of radiation therapy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Waters, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202103218
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.