Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Characteristics in Anal Fistulas

April 6, 2021 updated by: University of Aarhus

Identification of Molecular Differences of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Between Non- Responders and Responders in Treatment of Transsphincteric Perianal Fistulas Using Autologous Fat Graft Injection

This study investigated the cellular and molecular characteristics of AT-MSCs obtained from autologous AT therapy in patients with high transphincteric perianal fistulas of crytoglandular origin. Adipose tissue was injected into anal fistulas. Characteristics of adipose tissue mesenchymal stemcells (AT-MSC) was investigated and compared in patients with fistula that healed after the treatment (responders) to patients who failed to heal (non-responders)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Injection with allogene or autologous stem cells has been reported to be efficient treatment of perianal fistulas. An alternative to this treatment could be injection with freshly collected autologous adipose tissue. In this study 27 patients with cryptoglandular anal fistulas were treated with freshly collected autologous adipose tissue.A clinical assessment of the patient prior to inclusion was undertaken and a loose seton placed for at least 6 weeks prior to fat injection. An MRI of the pelvis was performed before inclusion. Fistulas with secondary tracts and/or cavities were excluded. The operation was performed in one procedure including liposuction and injection of adipose tissue. A sample of adipose tissue from all 27 patients was analyzed. AT-MSCs were isolated and characterized using cellular and molecular analyses. Clinical and MRI-scanning evaluation of fistula healing and evaluation of ano-rectal function was performed after 6 months. AT-MSCs phenotype was compared between responders and non-responders with respect to fistula healing. The evaluation of the AT-MSCs was performed in a blinded manner.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
27

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • high trans-sphincteric fistulas
  • fistula confirmed and classified by an MRI.
  • seton (> 6 weeks) prior to fat injection
  • informed, written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Anovaginal fistula

  • Active sepsis
  • IBD, immunodeficiency, prior pelvic irradiation and malignancy
  • Insulin dependent diabetes
  • More than 4 prior attempts of fistula closure
  • Tobacco smoking or nicotine substitution 8 weeks prior to fat injection.
  • Pregnancy
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • BMI ≥ 35 or BMI<20
  • Active tuberculosis
  • Patient less than 18 years
  • Unable to undergo MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Injection with adipose tissue
Injection of freshly collected autologous adipose tissue
Procedure: Injection of autologous adipose tissue in anal fistula

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Investigation of cell proliferation of AT-MSCs
Time Frame: At start of treatment
Cell proliferation of AT-MSCs evaluated as number of cells/per day
At start of treatment
Investigation of differentiation potential of AT-MSCs to differentiate into adipocyte
Time Frame: At start of treatment
Differentiation potential of AT-MSCs: to differentiate into adipocyte measured by Oil-Red O staining and gene expression of adipogenic markers (PPARg and LPL normalized to housekeeping gene beta actin) presented as a Fold change to undifferentiated cells (arbitrary units)
At start of treatment
Investigation of differentiation potential of AT-MSCs to differentiate into osteoblast
Time Frame: At start of treatment
Differentiation potential of AT-MSCs: to differentiate into osteoblast measured by Alizarin S staining and gene expression of osteogenic markers (BGALP and RUNX2 normalized to housekeeping gene beta actin) presented as a Fold change to undifferentiated cells (arbitrary units)
At start of treatment
Measurement of gene expression profile of AT-MSCs
Time Frame: At start of treatment
Gene expression of proinflammatory (NFKB, TNFa, IL1B, IL6) and senescence associated molecules(CDKN2A, TP53, TGFB1, VEGFA, IFNG, IL6) of AT-MSCs in relation to the outcome of fistula treatment (i.e. comparison between responders and non-responders). The data are normalized to housekeeping gene beta actin (arbitrary units)
At start of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healing of anal fistula after treatment
Time Frame: 6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
Clinical healing defined as closure of the internal and external fistula opening and no discharge evaluated as success rate of the healing in (%)
6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
Evaluation of fistula healing after treatment
Time Frame: 6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
A combination of Clinical and MRI healing defined as closure of the internal and external fistula opening and no discharge and no fluid filled fistula tracts on evaluated as success rate of the healing in (%)
6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
Functional gastroenterological outcome after treatment
Time Frame: 6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
Anal continence evaluated as the St. Mark's Score (0-24)
6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
Defecation disorder evaluation after treatment
Time Frame: 6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
Defecation disorders evaluated as Altomare Obstructed Defecation Score (0-31)
6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
Functional urological outcome after treatment
Time Frame: 6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue
Urinary incontinence evaluated as ICIQ-UI-SF (0-21)
6 months after last injection of autologous adipose tissue

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Aarhus

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Southern Denmark
UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AT-MSCs_Anal fistulas

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings