Effects of a Patient Portal Intervention to Address Diabetes Care Gaps

March 23, 2025 updated by: William Martinez, MD, MS, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Effects of a Patient Portal Intervention to Address Diabetes Care Gaps: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a novel patient portal intervention on the number of patients with diabetes care gaps (e.g., no diabetes eye exam i the last 12 months). The intervention is designed to: (a) notify patients when selected, clinically meaningful, evidence-based diabetes monitoring & preventative care (e.g., annual urine microalbumin) are due and (b) allow patients to initiate orders for the care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Participants will be recruited from 14 VUMC-affiliate adult primary care clinics located throughout Middle Tennessee. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention or usual care. 500 adult patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus will be assigned to one of two arms. 250 will be assigned to receive access to the intervention embedded within an existing patient web portal (My Health at Vanderbilt) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. 250 will be assigned to a usual care comparison arm with access to the currently available version of My Health at Vanderbilt without the study intervention. At enrollment, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire and diabetes health data will be abstracted from the patients' electronic health record (EHR) before being assigned to the intervention or control arm. Participants will receive additional follow-up questionnaires and diabetes health data will be abstracted from the EHR at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups to assess outcomes. In addition, system usage data (user analytics) will be collected throughout the study period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
440

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Established patient with a participating primary care physician from a participating clinic
  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Able to read in English
  • Age 18 to 75 years old
  • Mobile device (smartphone or tablet) with internet access
  • Active My Health at Vanderbilt (MHAV) account

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A medical condition that prevents use of a mobile device
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period
  • Severe difficulty seeing
  • On dialysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention

Patients have access to an existing patient web portal (My Health at Vanderbilt) embedded with the Diabetes Care Gaps Patient Portal Intervention.

.
Other: Diabetes Care Gaps Patient Portal Intervention
The Diabetes Care Gaps Patient Portal Intervention is embedded within an existing patient web portal (My Health at Vanderbilt). The intervention (a) notifies patients when selected, clinically meaningful, evidence-based diabetes monitoring & preventative care (e.g., annual urine microalbumin) are due and (b) allows patients to initiate orders for the care.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients will have access to an existing patient web portal (My Health at Vanderbilt) NOT embedded with the intervention (i.e., usual care).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Diabetes Care Gaps at Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, and 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up

Number of diabetes care gaps per patient out of four possible:

  1. no diabetes eye exam in the last 12 months,
  2. no hemoglobin A1C blood test in the last 6 months,
  3. no urine microalbumin in the last 12 months, and
  4. no pneumococcal vaccination of any kind ( i.e., never received PPSV-23, PCV-13, PCV-15, or PCV-20) The presence of a diabetes care gap will be assessed by electronic health record (EHR) abstraction.
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Diabetes Distress
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5) is a valid measure of diabetes distress. The PAID-5 contains 5 items which have a five-point response option (0-4 representing 'Not a problem' through to 'Serious problem'). Total scores on the PAID-5 can range from 0 to 20, with higher scores suggesting greater diabetes-related emotional distress care (e.g., Diabetes Eye Exams) will be administered to all study participants.
Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
Change in Understanding of Diabetes Monitoring and Preventative Care
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
Unique study specific items (four items) to assess participant's understanding of measures of diabetes monitoring and preventative care (e.g., Diabetes Eye Exams) will be administered to all study participants. Each multiple-choice item has only one correct answer and the overall measure is scored as the percent of the items answered correctly.
Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
Satisfaction/Usability of My Health at Vanderbilt
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a valid measure of usability and assesses user's perceptions of ease of use, likability of the interface, and overall satisfaction. Each question on the 10-item questionnaire is scored on a 5-point Likert scale [0 (Strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree)] and the sum is totaled (0-40). The total sum is then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Based on prior research, a score above 68 would be above average and a score of 85 or above suggests excellent usability. The SUS has been used in several studies of patient facing health information technology (the article describing its psychometric properties has been cited over 500 times) and has excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.91).
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up
Change in Diabetes Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
The Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS) is a valid measure of diabetes self-efficacy (i.e., how confident they feel about their ability to carry out multiple self management tasks). The uni-dimensional, 8-item scale is scored on a five-point Likert scale. The total PDSMS score can range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating more confidence in self-managing one's diabetes.
Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
Patient Initiated Orders
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up
The number of patient-initiated orders via the study intervention for evidence-based diabetes monitoring and preventative services (e.g., A1c).
12-month follow-up
Change in Confidence Toward Managing Diabetes in General
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
The 5-item Manage Disease in General Scale of the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales is a validated measure of the confidence a person has in managing their own health and health care and is closely related to patient activation. The items were adapted to be specific to diabetes rather than a generic condition or illness. Each item uses a 10-point Likert-type scale of response options ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). Responses result in total raw scores ranging from 1 to 10. The score for the scale is the mean of the items. Higher scores indicate greater confidence in managing diabetes in general.
Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
Change in Blood Glucose Control
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-month follow-up
Participants' most recent hemoglobin A1C will be abstracted from participants' electronic medical record.
Baseline to 12-month follow-up
Treatment Intensification
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
The addition of: (a) antihyperglycemic medications and (b) antihypertensive medications will be assessed by EHR abstraction.
Baseline to 3-month follow-up, baseline to 6-month follow-up, and baseline to 12-month follow-up
Reported Services Completed Outside Vanderbilt System
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up
The number of patient reports of diabetes eye exams received outside the Vanderbilt University Medical Center health system submitted via the study intervention.
12-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: William Martinez, MD, MS, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 3, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 212257
  • R18DK123373 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After study results are posted on clinical trials and published in a peer-reviewed journal, de-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported will be available upon requests made to the principal investigator and ending after 36 months after publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Deidentified individual participant data that underlie the results reported will be available after publication in a peer reviewed journal and posted on clinical trials and ending after 36 months after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers should provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve their proposed aims. Proposals may be submitted to the principal investigator up to 36 months following publication. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings