Mobile Technology for Reducing and Preventing Adolescent Suicide

March 29, 2023 updated by: Hartford Hospital
This single-group open-label trial will evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a suicide prevention mobile application when used as an adjunct to usual care in adolescents.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will enroll 20 adolescent (age 13-17) inpatients at elevated risk for suicide. Participants will download the app onto their phones during their inpatient stay and will complete a single therapy session involving psychoeducation and crisis response planning. Participants will be encouraged to use the app on their own in addition to their usual outpatient services to learn and practice suicide prevention skills. Participants and their parents will be interviewed 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after discharge.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06106
        • Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatient psychiatric patients who have attempted suicide (lifetime) or have documented suicide ideation and a plan to harm themselves at admission
  • Understand written and spoken English
  • Own an iPhone with iOS 11 or higher, or Android with OS 8.1 or higher
  • Willing and able to complete enrollment procedures
  • Parent/guardian (and youth) able to understand the nature of the study and provide written informed consent (assent for youth)
  • Willing to agree to release of information to their parent/guardian and providers when clinically indicated.
  • Discharge plan includes aftercare within the Hartford HealthCare system (to facilitate coordination of care during follow up)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active psychosis
  • Patients experiencing substance withdrawal
  • Currently enrolled in other treatment studies for the symptoms and behaviors targeted
  • Patient unwilling or unable to wear mask during in-person study procedures
  • Patients who, in the judgment of the investigator, would have an unfavorable risk/benefit profile with respect to the Smartphone App.
  • Any other psychiatric or medical condition (e.g., intellectual disability) or custody arrangement that in the investigator's opinion would preclude informed consent/assent or participation in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
Smartphone app teaching suicide prevention skills.
Behavioral: Smartphone App
Smartphone app teaching suicide prevention skills.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
App Usability 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week post discharge
The System Usability Scale (SUS) contains 10 items assessing the usability of digital technology. Items are rated from 1 to 5 with higher numbers representing stronger agreement with usability statements. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes, meaning increased usability of the technology. The mean and standard deviation for the SUS will be reported utilizing all available data.
1 week post discharge
App Usability 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks post discharge
The System Usability Scale (SUS) contains 10 items assessing the usability of digital technology. Items are rated from 1 to 5 with higher numbers representing stronger agreement with usability statements. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes, meaning increased usability of the technology. The mean and standard deviation for the SUS will be reported utilizing all available data.
4 weeks post discharge
App Usability 8 Weeks
Time Frame: 8 weeks post discharge
The System Usability Scale (SUS) contains 10 items assessing the usability of digital technology. Items are rated from 1 to 5 with higher numbers representing stronger agreement with usability statements. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes, meaning increased usability of the technology. The mean and standard deviation for the SUS will be reported utilizing all available data.
8 weeks post discharge
App Usability 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks post discharge
The System Usability Scale (SUS) contains 10 items assessing the usability of digital technology. Items are rated from 1 to 5 with higher numbers representing stronger agreement with usability statements. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes, meaning increased usability of the technology. The mean and standard deviation for the SUS will be reported utilizing all available data.
12 weeks post discharge
App Usability 16 Weeks
Time Frame: 16 weeks post discharge
The System Usability Scale (SUS) contains 10 items assessing the usability of digital technology. Items are rated from 1 to 5 with higher numbers representing stronger agreement with usability statements. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes, meaning increased usability of the technology. The mean and standard deviation for the SUS will be reported utilizing all available data.
16 weeks post discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicidal Ideation Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
The SIQ Jr is a 15-item measure assesses suicidal thoughts on a 7-point scale, with possible total scores ranging from 0-90). Higher scores indicate more severe suicidal ideation. Means and standard deviations will be reported utilizing all available data.
Baseline
Suicidal Ideation 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 Week post discharge
The SIQ Jr is a 15-item measure assesses suicidal thoughts on a 7-point scale, with possible total scores ranging from 0-90). Higher scores indicate more severe suicidal ideation. Means and standard deviations will be reported utilizing all available data.
1 Week post discharge
Suicidal Ideation 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 Weeks post discharge
The SIQ Jr is a 15-item measure assesses suicidal thoughts on a 7-point scale, with possible total scores ranging from 0-90). Higher scores indicate more severe suicidal ideation. Means and standard deviations will be reported utilizing all available data.
4 Weeks post discharge
Suicidal Ideation 8 Weeks
Time Frame: 8 Weeks post discharge
The SIQ Jr is a 15-item measure assesses suicidal thoughts on a 7-point scale, with possible total scores ranging from 0-90). Higher scores indicate more severe suicidal ideation. Means and standard deviations will be reported utilizing all available data.
8 Weeks post discharge
Suicidal Ideation 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 Weeks post discharge
The SIQ Jr is a 15-item measure assesses suicidal thoughts on a 7-point scale, with possible total scores ranging from 0-90). Higher scores indicate more severe suicidal ideation. Means and standard deviations will be reported utilizing all available data.
12 Weeks post discharge
Suicidal Ideation 16 Weeks
Time Frame: 16 Weeks post discharge
The SIQ Jr is a 15-item measure assesses suicidal thoughts on a 7-point scale, with possible total scores ranging from 0-90). Higher scores indicate more severe suicidal ideation. Means and standard deviations will be reported utilizing all available data.
16 Weeks post discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hartford Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Oui Therapeutics, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David Tolin, Ph.D., Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HHC-2020-0363
  • R43MH125691 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings