Evaluation of ArTificial Intelligence System (Gi-Genius) for adenoMa dEtection in Lynch Syndrome. (Timely)

March 16, 2022 updated by: María Pellisé, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Evaluation of ArTificial Intelligence System (Gi-Genius) for adenoMa dEtection in Lynch Syndrome. A Randomized, Parallel, Multicenter, Controlled Trial. TIMELY Study.

The purpose of this study is to assess if artificial intelligence aid colonoscopy colonoscopy is superior to conventional colonoscopy for the detection of adenomas during surveillance colonoscopy in patients with Lynch syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To compare the performance of white-light colonoscopy (HD-WLE) versus white-light + CAD (CAD) for detection of adenomas (1:1 ratio). The CAD system will include an artificial intelligence-based medical device (GI Genius, Medtronic) trained to process colonoscopy images and superimpose them, in real time, on the endoscopy display as a green box over suspected lesion. An adequate bowel preparation and minimum withdrawal time of 6 min will be required. Colonoscopies will be performed by experienced endoscopists and with high-definition scopes. Lesions will be collected, and histopathology findings used as the reference standard. The primary outcome of this trial will be the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
404

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • María Pellisé. MD. PhD.
        • Contact:
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Oswaldo ortiz
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years with a proven pathogenic germline variant in one of the MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6) or Epcam deletion who are under surveillance colonoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of total colectomy,
  • Concomitant inflammatory bowel disease,
  • Inability or refuse to sign the informed consent,
  • Previous colonoscopy < 12 months.
  • Inadequate bowel preparation.
  • Incomplete procedure.
  • PMS2 mutation carriers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: CAD arm
Patients allocated to CAD arm will receive during colonoscopy withdrawal high definition white light endoscopy aided with artificial intelligence device (Gi Genius, Medtronic)
Device: Gi Genius, Medtronic
GI geniusTM (Medtronic) is an artificial intelligence device designed and validated on a dataset of white-light endoscopy videos from high-quality randomized controlled trials for the detection of colorectal lesions during colonoscopy. Based on a deep learning system using convolutional neural networks, GI genius works in real-time side-to-side with the gastroenterologist during colonoscopy highlighting the presence of precancerous lesions with a visual marker (green box) in real time and designed to be integrated with the majority of colonoscopies.
Placebo Comparator: WLE arm
Patients allocated to WLE arm will receive during colonoscopy withdrawal high definition white light endoscopy as standart of care.
Other: White light standart colonoscopy
High definition white light endoscopy will be used during the scope withdrawal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy
Time Frame: 18 months
Compare mean number of adenomas in both arms calculated by dividing the total number of adenomas detected by the total number of colonoscopies in each arm
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Withdrawal time
Time Frame: 18 months
time spent on inspection, from the cecum to endoscope extraction through the anus, excluding the time needed for therapeutic measures (including polypectomy).
18 months
Mean number of polyps per colonoscopy
Time Frame: 18 months
Compare mean number of polyps in both arms calculated by dividing the total number of polyps (including serrated lesions and adenomas) detected by the total number of colonoscopies in each arm
18 months
Adenoma detection rate
Time Frame: 18 months
proportion of individuals undergoing a complete colonoscopy who had at least one adenoma detected between two arms.
18 months
Polyp detection rate
Time Frame: 18 months
proportion of individuals undergoing a complete colonoscopy who had at least one polyp detected between two arms.
18 months
False positives in CAD arm
Time Frame: 18 months

Combination of:

  • Lesions detected by CAD (>2s green box) after an adequate inspection with a high confidence optical diagnosis negative for neoplasia made by the endoscopist.
  • Lesions detected by CAD (>2s green box) after an adequate inspection resected by the endoscopist and with a clinically non-significant histology.
18 months
Mean number of non-clinically significant removed lesions
Time Frame: 18 months
Lesions removed and with a histology of normal or inflammatory mucosa or removed diminutive recto-sigmoid polyps with a histology of hyperplastic
18 months
Subjective endoscopist measures
Time Frame: 18 months
Questionary addresing the easiness and satisfaction of the procedure, detection of lesions and performance of artificial intelligence will be filled in by each endoscopist
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Timely

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings