Quantifying Gait Alteration in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Wearable Device (eMSGait)

June 2, 2022 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Uncontrolled, Single-center Study to Quantify Gait Disturbance in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Gait alteration is frequent in MS and limitation in walking ability is a major concern in MS patients. The development of wearable device offers the opportunity to collect data during daily activity including walking.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Umanit and LMJ (Nantes university) has developed a device call eMSgait to assess walking ability in MS patients individuals (eg MS patients). This device consists in a commercialized IMU sensor (MetaMotionR Sensor, Mbientilab) worn at the right hip, a smartphone app and dedicated algorithm/mathematical model to extract raw sensor data and calculate individual gait pattern (IGP). This IGP consists of a curve, based on quaternion and representing the rotation recorded by the IMU during an average gait cycle. Pursue first pilot work assessing information from IGP on gait alteration in MS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
    • Loire-Atlantique
      • Nantes, Loire-Atlantique, France, 44093
        • Nantes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

MS patients cohort followed at Nantes university hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 - 64 years
  • Diagnosis of MS based on McDonald criteria (including Relapsing-remitting and progressive MS)
  • No relapse within the last 5 weeks before recruitment
  • Able to walk with or without assistance/help/aid (one or 2 canes)
  • EDSS [0-6]

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant
  • Patient having expressed their opposition
  • Patient under guardianship or security measure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
eMSGait
Record of IGP using IMU sensor (Metamotion R mbientlab) during T25FW.
Other: Wearable sensor
IMU sensor (as part of eMSGait device) worn at the hip during T25FW
Other Names:
  • MetaMotionR Sensor, Mbientilab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation with disability
Time Frame: One time point per patient (inclusion)
Correlation of gait measures (mean amplitude of walking cycles (m), mean duration of walking cycles (s), Stance swing phase ratio) obtained during a walk of 25 feet with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). EDSS is an ordinal scale measuring disability and ranging from 0 (normal examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in a 0,5-point increments from score 1.
One time point per patient (inclusion)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation with neurological function
Time Frame: One time point per patient (inclusion)
Pyramidal, cerebellar and sensory functions are assessed with Kurtzke functional system scores which are based on neurological examination. Scores of the Pyramidal and sensory systems range from 0 (normal) to 6 . Cerebellar system scores range from 0 (normal) to 6. Cerebellar system scores range from 0 (normal) to 5
One time point per patient (inclusion)
Correlation with gait speed
Time Frame: One time point per patient (inclusion)
Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW). T25FW measures the time needed to complete a 25-foot walk. Two trials are averaged
One time point per patient (inclusion)
Correlation with lateralization
Time Frame: One time point per patient (inclusion)
Lower limb lateralization (right vs left)
One time point per patient (inclusion)
Correlation with disability location
Time Frame: One time point per patient (inclusion)
Upper, lower limb, trunk MS symptoms location
One time point per patient (inclusion)
Correlation with MS symptoms severity
Time Frame: One time point per patient (inclusion)
MS symptoms severity quote as none, mild moderate severe
One time point per patient (inclusion)
Reliability of sensor measures
Time Frame: At the inclusion
Gait parameters record during a 25-foot walk repeated twice at 5 min apart.
At the inclusion
Developement of dedicated algorithm to improve signal processing from IMU.
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of detected gait cycles during a foot walk.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nantes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RC21_0070

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings