1:1 Comparison of the Pocket Colposcope in Kenya

June 5, 2025 updated by: Duke University

Compare the Performance of the Pocket Colposcope to VIA/VILI for Triage of HPV+ Women in Kenya

The Pocket colposcope has 510k FDA clearance and has been successfully used in almost 1500 unique patients globally in Duke and non-Duke protocols to date. 400 women who are HPV-positive and planned to undergo treatment at 6 Ministry of Health-supported outpatient clinics in Kisumu County will be recruited to the study. After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized 1:1 to either standard-of-care visual inspection or colposcopy with the Pocket Colposcope

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Women randomized to the standard-of-care arm will undergo VIA followed by Visual Inspection with Lugol's Iodine (VILI). Women randomized to the Pocket Colposcope arm will undergo Pocket-Assisted VIA (PA-VIA), green light imaging, and VILI using the Pocket Colposcope. Women in both arms will have biopsies taken of any suspicious lesions, or two biopsies taken in random locations if no lesions are visible. The locations of the biopsies will be based on provider impression. After their study-exams and biopsies are taken, women who are eligible for ablative treatment will be immediately treated in the clinic. Those with larger lesions or lesions concerning for invasive cancer will be referred to the local hospital for an excisional procedure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
434

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Kenya
      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Kenya Medical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 25 years old and < 65 years old
  2. Sex: Female
  3. Positive HPV test within past 6 months
  4. HIV+ women

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women (cannot perform a cervical biopsy on a patient who is pregnant unless absolutely indicated)
  2. Women with a negative HPV test
  3. Patients incapable of giving informed consent
  4. Women with a history of cervical cancer
  5. Pelvic exam concerning for cervical cancer or cervical infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care

Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA): First, the cervix should be wiped with a cotton swab to remove any preexisting mucous and/or blood. A 3-5% acetic acid solution will be applied to the cervix using a spray bottle or fox swab. After approximately 1-minute, any changes to the cervix using the naked eye will be noted. Acetic acid may be reapplied if acetowhitening diminishes during visual inspection.

Visual Inspection with Lugol's Iodine (VILI): After imaging with Acetic acid, Lugol's iodine will be applied using a fox swab noting any yellow or non-staining areas. Lesion location(s) will be noted on a clock-face diagram and used to direct biopsy if a lesion is present or random biopsies will be obtained from two quadrants in the absence of a visible lesion.
Procedure: Standard of Care Colposcopy
VIA and VILI as previously described,
Experimental: Pocket Colposcope

Pocket-Assisted Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (PA-VIA): The cervix should be wiped with a cotton swab to remove any preexisting mucous and/or blood. A 3-5% acetic acid solution will be applied using a spray bottle or fox swab. After approximately 1-minute, using the Pocket Colposcope any changes to the cervix will be noted. Using the Calla Health image acquisition software, both white and green images of the cervix will be captured at low-resolution. High-resolution green light images will be obtained at the provider's discretion. Acetic acid may be reapplied between white and green imaging at the provider's discretion if acetowhitening diminishes.

Pocket-Assisted Visual Inspection with Lugol's Iodine (PA-VILI): After imaging with AA, Lugol's iodine will be applied using a fox swab noting any yellow or non-staining areas. Images will be acquired. A biopsy will be obtained using the pocket. Random biopsies will be obtained from 2 quadrants in the absence of a visible lesion.
Device: Pocket Colposcope
Both arms will receive treatment in order to prevent cervical cancer. However, the intervention using the pocket colposcope device will be used on half the enrolled subjects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Exams With Lesions Identified
Time Frame: Baseline
The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of VIA versus the Pocket Colposcope for detecting CIN2+ lesions.
Baseline
Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline
Sensitivity of Pocket vs VIA
Baseline
Specificity
Time Frame: Baseline
Specificity of Pocket vs VIA
Baseline
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Time Frame: Baseline
Negative predictive value (NPV) of Pocket vs VIA
Baseline
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Time Frame: Baseline
Positive predictive value (PPV) of Pocket vs VIA
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants Who Reported Having No Awareness About Cervical Cancer and Cervical Cancer Prevention, Assessed by Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline
Participants were asked how much they knew about cervical cancer and cervical cancer prevention prior to the exam and after the visit.
baseline
Percent of Providers Who Reported Experiencing no Challenges During the Exam
Time Frame: baseline
Providers perspective was assessed using the question: 'Did you run into any of the following challenges during today's exam?'.
baseline
Percent of Participants Who Reported Experiencing Pain During Their Exam
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant perspective of the exam was assessed by asking "Did you experience any pain throughout your exam?"
Baseline
Percent of Participants Who Expressed Confidence in Their Provider's Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant perspective of the exam was assessed by asking "How confident are you in the provider's assessment from today's visit?"
Baseline
Percent of Participants Who Would Recommend the Exam to a Friend
Time Frame: Baseline
Participant perspective of the exam was assessed by asking "How likely would you recommend this medical exam to a friend?"
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Kenya Medical Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Megan Huchko, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 5, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00106169

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care Colposcopy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings