Effectiveness of Expiratory Muscle Strength Training for Improving Communication in ALS

June 6, 2023 updated by: HuberLab, Purdue University
A tele-health treatment study for individuals with early stage ALS with the aim to improve communication, cough response, and respiratory strength. All participants complete a respiratory strength training program using an Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST 150) device from the comfort of their homes for 6 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators are looking for people with early stage ALS to participate in a completely tele-health (no in-person visits required) treatment study examining the effects of an Expiratory Muscle Strength Training device (EMST-150) on communication, cough, and respiratory strength. Participants will be required to attend 2 virtual baseline assessment sessions followed by 12 additional virtual training sessions (2 per week for 6 weeks). Participants should plan to be actively enrolled in the study for ~10 weeks (3 weeks of baseline monitoring followed by 6 weeks of training). Participants will also be required to fill out a series of questionnaires assessing the EMST's effectiveness via tele-health.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Indiana
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47906
        • Purdue University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of ALS
  • Within the early stages of disease progression (i.e., able to talk, breathe, and eat independently)
  • Speaker of English
  • Have a family member/caregiver willing to assist as needed
  • Have access to an electronic device and internet for tele-health

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of neurological disease (besides ALS)
  • A history of asthma or respiratory problems (e.g., COPD, emphysema)
  • A history of head, neck, or chest surgery (except mastectomy)
  • A history of smoking within the last 5 years
  • Reliance on mechanical ventilation (including CPAP)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Expiratory Muscle Strength Training
All participants will forcefully breathe out into an Expiratory Muscle Strength Training device (EMST-150) 25 times per day for 6 weeks. The EMST device will be set at a moderate intensity level (50% of each participant's maximum expiratory pressure).
Device: Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST-150)
All participants will forcefully breathe out into an Expiratory Muscle Strength Training device (EMST-150) 25 times per day for 6 weeks. The EMST device will be set at a moderate intensity level (50% of each participant's maximum expiratory pressure).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Post-treatment for Maximum Expiratory Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (week 2), Pre-Training (week 3), and Post-Training (week 10)
Change in expiratory muscle strength throughout the study duration measured by the participant blowing into a pressure meter
Baseline 2 (week 2), Pre-Training (week 3), and Post-Training (week 10)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (week 2), Pre-training (week 3), Post-Training (week 10)
Change in cough strength (as measured by peak expiratory flow rate) throughout the study duration, measured using a flow meter that the participant coughs into - single coughs. Data from baseline 2 and pre-training were averaged for the pre--training value.
Baseline 2 (week 2), Pre-training (week 3), Post-Training (week 10)
Change From Baseline to Post-Treatment in Utterance Length
Time Frame: Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
Change in utterance length (# of syllables produced on one breath) throughout the study duration. Participant read the Rainbow Passage and data were collected from this task.
Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
Change From Baseline to Post-Treatment in Number of Pauses
Time Frame: Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
Change in the total number of pauses that included breathing (breath pauses). Participant read the Rainbow Passage and data were collected from this task.
Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
Change From Baseline to Post-Treatment in Syntactic Location of Pauses
Time Frame: Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
Change in the location of pauses while breathing produced while reading. We determined where participants took breaths while reading the Rainbow Passage and categorized them according to syntax. Categories included at a major boundary (at the end of an independent clause marked by a period) and at a boundary that is not related to syntax (not a major or minor syntactical location). The number of pauses at each category of boundaries were converted to a percent of the total breaths taken while reading the passage.
Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
Telehealth Satisfaction
Time Frame: Post-Training (week 10)
Participants rated 15 statements with a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Example statements include: I can easily talk to my health-care provider, I can hear my health-care provider clearly, I can see my health-care provider as if we met in person, I think the care provided via telemedicine is consistent, and I receive adequate attention, telemedicine provides for my health care need, and overall, I am satisfied with the quality of service being provided via telemedicine. Total scores range from 0-75 and individual statement scores ranged from 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction with the telepractice modality.
Post-Training (week 10)
Change From Pre-Training to Post-Training in Communication Participation Item Bank
Time Frame: Pre-Training (week 3) and Post-Training (week 10)
Participants were instructed to use a 4-point Likert scale (3: not at all; 2: a little; 1: quite a bit; 0: very much) to rate if/how their ALS impacts ten hypothetical communicative situations. Participants total scores were then added together, ranging from 0-30, and converted to a T-score ranging from 24.2-71.0. High scores are more favorable, indicating that the participant feels that ALS impacts their communicative participation less than those with lower scores.
Pre-Training (week 3) and Post-Training (week 10)
Change From Baseline to Post-Treatment in ALS Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
The ALS Quality of Life Scale-Revised (ALSQOL-R) (Simmons, 2015) was used to measure how ALS impacts their quality of life in six domains: negative emotion, interaction with people and the environment, intimacy, religiosity, physical symptoms, and bulbar function. Participants rate whether they strongly disagree (0) or strongly agree (10) with 46 statements. Each domain score is given an average value between 0 (worse) and 10 (best). Total scores on the ALSQOL-R range from 0-460, but an average score ranging from 0-10 is computed by dividing the total score by the total number of items completed by the participant (usually 46). Higher scores reflect a higher quality of life. A survey assessing how each participant feels ALS impacts quality of life, and how that changes throughout the study duration. Total scores range from 0-460, with higher scores indicating greater contributions of ALS to quality of life.
Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
ALS Function Rating Scale Revised
Time Frame: Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
A survey that quantifies change in disease progression throughout the study duration. Participants rate how 12 physical functions are impacted by their ALS. For each function, participants are provided with a 4-point Likert scale to rate whether they still have complete control of that function (4) or no ability to perform that function (0). Total scores range from 0 to 48, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and higher scores and less severe symptoms.
Baseline 1 (week 1) and Post-Training (week 10)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale
Time Frame: Post-treatment (week 10)
A survey assessing how the training device/modality impacts patient's psychosocial functions. The PIADS includes 12 items for competence, 6 for adaptability, and 8 for self-esteem. Participants use a 7-point Likert scale to rate the impact of a device on each item: a maximum negative impact (-3), somewhat negative impact (-2 or -1), zero impact (0), somewhat positive impact (1 or 2), maximum positive impact (3). Total scores range from -78 (maximum negative impact) to 78 (maximum positive impact).
Post-treatment (week 10)
Tele-health Session Attendance
Time Frame: Measured at the end of training across the entire training period
% of training sessions scheduled and attended by participants throughout the study duration
Measured at the end of training across the entire training period
Adherence to Training Protocol
Time Frame: Measured each week of training across the entire training duration
Number of of training exhalations completed (25 exhalations into the device, 5 days per week) by participants throughout the study duration
Measured each week of training across the entire training duration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Purdue University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jessica E Huber, Ph.D., Purdue University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB-2020-524
  • 1F31DC019281-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings