Addressing Disparities in Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis Using a Direct-to-home Telemedicine Tool

August 18, 2026 updated by: Zachary Warren, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Addressing Disparities in ASD Diagnosis Using a Direct-to-home Telemedicine Tool: Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy, Psychometric Properties, and Family Engagement

The investigators propose to evaluate the use of a telemedicine tool, the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP), that is designed to assess for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms in toddlers. The TAP was developed at VUMC by a team of clinical psychologists with expertise in the early identification of ASD. The TAP has been studied in controlled laboratory settings, with high levels of family and clinician satisfaction, as well as excellent agreement with blinded comprehensive ASD evaluation. The TAP has also been used to complete direct-to-home telemedicine assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the investigators have not yet compared direct-to-home assessments using the TAP with gold standard, in-person ASD assessments. It has also not yet been studied in a diverse sample of families or with providers outside of VUMC. This study will allow the investigators to address those gaps.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators propose to evaluate the use of a telemedicine tool, the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP), that is designed to assess for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms in toddlers. This study will recruit 360 toddlers (18-42 months of age) across two sites (VUMC and the University of California, Davis). All toddlers will receive in-home telemedicine assessment for ASD using the TAP. This study has two aims. The first aim will randomize participants to receive either (1) telemedicine assessment and an in-person ASD assessment or (2) telemedicine-based assessment only. The investigators will measure diagnostic accuracy of the TAP in comparison to gold standard, in-person ASD assessment. The investigators will also assess test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the TAP. In the second aim, all 360 families will be followed over six months to evaluate service access, family engagement, and family perceptions of the diagnostic process.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
664

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Uc Davis Mind Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Children:

  • Child between 18 and 42 months of age
  • Child and primary caregiver live within a 3-hour driving radius of one of the sites (i.e., VUMC or UC Davis)

Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Parent or legal guardian of participating child
  • Has access to technology (e.g., phone, laptop, or tablet with internet connection and audio-visual capabilities) to connect to the tele-assessment platform
  • Sufficient facility with English to participate in the procedures and complete study measures.

Exclusion Criteria for Children:

  • Severe sensorimotor impairment that cannot be corrected and would interfere with completion of study activities
  • Medical conditions for which tele-evaluation of ASD symptoms is likely to be inappropriate or complex (i.e., rare genetic syndromes, severe epilepsy, fragile health).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Tele-assessment + in-person assessment
Participants in this group will receive a tele-assessment using the TAP and will attend a traditional, in-person evaluation for autism spectrum disorder in a clinic setting.
Behavioral: Tele-assessment + in-person assessment
Participants will complete a tele-assessment using the TAP. They will complete a traditional, in-person autism spectrum disorder assessment approximately two weeks later.
Active Comparator: Tele-assessment only
Participants in this group will receive a tele-assessment using the TAP, followed by a second, shorter tele-assessment.
Behavioral: Tele-assessment only
Participants will complete a tele-assessment using the TAP. They will complete a second, shorter tele-assessment approximately two weeks later.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of the TAP
Time Frame: Baseline to completion of in-person autism evaluation, approximately two weeks
The investigators will compare diagnoses made from the tele-assessment using TAP to those from in-person evaluation. We will calculate the percent agreement between diagnoses assigned in each condition.
Baseline to completion of in-person autism evaluation, approximately two weeks
Validity of the TAP
Time Frame: Baseline to completion of in-person autism evaluation, approximately two weeks
Validity of the TAP will be measured by assessing the psychometric properties of the tool. Estimated performance metrics will include positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of the TAP.
Baseline to completion of in-person autism evaluation, approximately two weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Family perceptions of tele-assessment
Time Frame: Baseline
Family perceptions of tele-assessment will be measured by the Parent Perceptions of Telemedicine (PPT) survey. The PPT is an 11-question survey. Seven questions are measured on a three-point scale and will provide quantitative data. Each question ranges from 1 (not true) to 3 (very true). Possible survey scores can range from 7 to 21. Higher scores indicate more positive perceptions of tele-assessment.
Baseline
Family satisfaction with diagnostic services
Time Frame: Baseline and six-month follow-up
Family satisfaction with diagnostic services will be measured by the Parent Service Satisfaction (PSS) survey. The PSS is an 7-question survey. Questions are measured on a three-point scale ranging from 1 (not true) to 3 (very true). Possible survey scores can range from 7 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with diagnostic services.
Baseline and six-month follow-up
Family empowerment
Time Frame: Baseline and six-month follow-up
Family empowerment will be measured using the Family Empowerment Scale (FES), which asks questions about caregiver self-efficacy related to understanding, navigating, and supporting their child's needs. The FES is an 24-question survey. Questions are measured on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Possible survey scores can range from 24 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater self-perceived empowerment.
Baseline and six-month follow-up
Child service access and utilization
Time Frame: Baseline to six-month follow-up
Child service access and use will be measured using the Service Access and Utilization (SAU) questionnaire. The questionnaires asks about receipt of Part C early intervention services as well as private therapy services. Caregivers will complete the questionnaire at seven time points (approximately 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 180 days following initial evaluation). At each time point, caregivers will endorse service milestones they have reached (e.g., scheduled an evaluation with the Part C service system, created an Individualized Family Service Plan, began services). We will calculate time to each milestone for each participant.
Baseline to six-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zachary Warren, Ph.D., Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 10, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 6, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 18, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 210760
  • 1R01MH127228-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings