Efficacy of LipiFlow in Patients Affected by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Reducing Post-cataract Surgery Dry Eye (LIPICAT)
Evaluation of the Efficacy of LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation Treatment Performed Before Cataract Surgery in Patients Affected by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Reducing Postoperative Dry Eye Disease
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
FI
-
Florence, FI, Italy, 50134
- Eye clinic, Careggi University hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men or women ≥18 years old
- Patients affected by age-related cataract <3 according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III scale (LOCS III)
- Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) diagnosed using slit lamp examination, following the criteria reported in the paper Arita R. et al, Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:125-137.
- Fluorescein tear BUT <7 seconds
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with documented history and / or clinical signs of concomitant presence of an eye infection caused by viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) or fungi in the previous 3 months.
- Patients with anterior blepharitis or Demodex
- Meibomian gland atrophy score greater than 2/3
- Subject treated with drugs that can have effects on MGD prior to inclusion in the study
- Active ocular inflammation or history of chronic eye inflammation recurrent in the previous 3 months (e.g. retinitis, macular inflammation, choroiditis, uveitis, iritis, scleritis, episcleritis, keratitis)
- Eyelid abnormalities affecting eyelid function (entropion, ectropion, neoplasia, blepharospasm, lagophthalmos, severe trichiasis, severe ptosis)
- Abnormalities of the ocular surface that compromise the integrity of the cornea (e.g.
previous chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosion, corneal epithelial defect, corneal dystrophy)
- Subjects who underwent eye surgery in the previous 3 months, including intraocular, oculo-plastic, corneal or refractive surgery
- Patients suffering from diabetes mellitus, rheumatism, immune diseases and other serious systemic diseases
- Pregnant or lactating women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: LipiFlow group
Single preoperative treatment with the thermal pulsation system LipiFlow within two months before cataract surgery
|
Single treatment with LipiFlow thermal pulsation system on the eyelids within two months before surgery
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control group
Eyelid warm compresses plus eyelid massage twice a day for the preoperative month
|
Eyelid warm compresses plus massages twice a day for the preoperative month
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
NIBUT (Non-Invasive Break-Up Time)
Time Frame: The difference between the change in NIBUT of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in NIBUT of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in NIBUT of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tear meniscus height
Time Frame: The difference between the change in tear meniscus height of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in tear meniscus height of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in tear meniscus height of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
|
Schirmer test I
Time Frame: The difference between the change in Schirmer test I of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in Schirmer test I of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in Schirmer test I of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
|
Corneal fluorescein staining
Time Frame: The difference between the change in corneal fluorescein staining of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in corneal fluorescein staining of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in corneal fluorescein staining of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
|
SPEED (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire) questionnaire score
Time Frame: The difference between the change in SPEED questionnaire score of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in SPEED questionnaire score of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in SPEED questionnaire score of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
|
Meibomian gland status assessed using confocal microscopy
Time Frame: The difference between the change in Meibomian gland status of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in Meibomian gland status of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in Meibomian gland status of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
|
Eyelid margin assessed using slit lamp examination
Time Frame: The difference between the change in eyelid margins of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in eyelid margins of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
The difference between the change in eyelid margins of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rita Mencucci, MD, Aou Careggi
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19220/SPE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.