Propofol Versus Ketamine for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Ill Patients (PROMINE)
Propofol Versus Ketamine for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Unblinded, Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The optimal and safest hypnotic agent for rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients remains uncertain. Factors such as hypovolemia, vasoplegia, hypoxemia, and acidosis can influence the efficacy and safety of induction agents. Propofol is commonly used for this purpose; however, it is associated with the risk of exacerbating hypotension. Ketamine, which has a more favorable hemodynamic profile, may offer a safer alternative in these patients. Objective: To assess whether ketamine is a safer alternative to propofol for rapid sequence intubation by reducing the incidence of hypotension during induction in critically ill patients.
Methods: This will be a randomized, open-label, pragmatic, bicenter study. A total of 170 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit will be randomly assigned to receive either ketamine or propofol as the hypnotic agent. Randomization will be conducted using RedCap with a 1:1 ratio and variable block sizes, stratified by study site and vasopressor use during intubation. Results: The primary outcome will be the occurrence of hypotension, defined as the lowest mean arterial pressure recorded within the first 10 minutes following induction. Secondary outcomes, assessed within 1 hour post-induction, include mortality, incidence of cardiopulmonary arrest, the occurrence of severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80mmHg), the occurrence of severe hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 85%), and the number of intubation attempts. Conclusion: The PROMINE study will provide valuable evidence to guide the selection of hypnotic agents for rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients. It will contribute to a better understanding of the hemodynamic effects associated with propofol and ketamine in this context, potentially informing clinical practice.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Raysa Schmidt, MD
- Phone Number: +551155764848
- Email: csraysa@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Flavia R Machado, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 17018 +551155764848
Study Locations
-
-
São Paulo
-
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 04038002
- Federal University of São Paulo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age above 18 years old
- Physician indicated intubation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Intubation during cardiac arrest
- Known of suspected intracranial hypertension
- Know allergy to any of the study drugs (lidocaine, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, or rocuronium)
- Bradycardia (heart rate below 50 beats per minute) or atrioventricular block without a pacemaker
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ketamine
|
2 mg per kilogram of body weight
|
|
Active Comparator: Propofol
|
1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lowest mean blood pressure
Time Frame: Ten minutes after induction
|
For the primary outcome, a pre-specified subgroup analysis will evaluate the following groups: patients < 70 versus ≥ 70 years old; patients with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score < 8 versus ≥ 8 points; patients on vasopressor versus without vasopressors; and patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) versus those without ARDS.
Each subgroup analysis will be performed using linear regression, adjusted for baseline MAP before induction, total vasopressor dose in the first 10 minutes, age, and a random patient intercept.
Effect estimates will be reported as mean differences with 95%CIs for each subgroup, with respective interaction p values.
We will not adjust for multiplicity.
|
Ten minutes after induction
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average MAP within the first hour after induction
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Average MAP within the first hour after induction
|
1 hour
|
|
Early death
Time Frame: 01 hour
|
Death within one hour of intubation
|
01 hour
|
|
Cardiac arrest
Time Frame: 01 hour
|
Cardiac arrest requiring resuscitation
|
01 hour
|
|
Severe hypotension
Time Frame: 01 hour
|
Systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg
|
01 hour
|
|
Severe hypoxemia
Time Frame: 01 hour
|
Peripheral oxygen saturation below 85%
|
01 hour
|
|
Time for successful intubation
Time Frame: 01 hour
|
Time for successful intubation
|
01 hour
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The highest heart rate (HR) within one hour after induction
Time Frame: 01 hour
|
The highest heart rate (HR) within one hour after induction
|
01 hour
|
|
The total dose of vasopressors administered within the first 24 hours, using noradrenaline equivalent dose
Time Frame: 24 hours after intubation
|
Cumulative, in milligrams, dose of vasopressors used
|
24 hours after intubation
|
|
Mean change in vasopressor dose (norepinephrine equivalent) from baseline to hour 1
Time Frame: 01 hour
|
Mean change in vasopressor dose (norepinephrine equivalent) from baseline to hour 1
|
01 hour
|
|
Ventilator-free days within the first 7 days
Time Frame: 07 days
|
Ventilator-free days within the first 7 days, defined as the number of days on which individuals are able to breathe spontaneously without any invasive ventilatory assistance, ascribing zero days to those who die, within 7 days.
|
07 days
|
|
Mortality at day 7
Time Frame: Seven days
|
Mortality at day 7
|
Seven days
|
|
ICU mortality
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit
|
60 days
|
|
Hospital mortality
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Mortality in hospital
|
60 days
|
|
The number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: 01 hour
|
The number of intubation attempts
|
01 hour
|
|
Number of participants with Hypertension, defined as SBP > 180 mmHg
Time Frame: the first 10 minutes
|
Number of participants with Hypertension, defined as SBP > 180 mmHg Safety outcomes during the first 10 minutes
|
the first 10 minutes
|
|
Number of participants with laryngospasm, as reported by the physician in charge of intubation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Laryngospasm, as reported by the physician in charge of intubation - safety outcome
|
10 minutes
|
|
Number of participants with bradycardia, defined as HR < 45 bpm
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Bradycardia, defined as HR < 45 bpm - safety outcome
|
10 minutes
|
|
Number of participants with arrhythmias
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Arrhythmias - safety outcome
|
10 minutes
|
|
Number of participants with bronchoaspiration
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Bronchoaspiration, defined as the presence of gastric content aspirated into the airway during intubation
|
10 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Raysa Schmidt, MD, Federal University of São Paulo
- Study Chair: Flavia R Machado, MD, PhD, Federal University of São Paulo
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Schmidt RC, Godinho Zampieri F, da Silva Ramos FJ, Santos Cavatoni Serra F, Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen BA, Fonseca Nunes N, Boschetti D, Chohfi Atallah F, Jackiu M, Garcia Melro LM, Nascimento Pontes CD, Vieira Tomotani DY, Petri Damiani L, Rezende de Freitas FG, Ribeiro Machado F; PROMINE Investigators. Propofol versus ketamine in rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2026 Mar 23. doi: 10.1007/s00134-026-08351-3. Online ahead of print.
- Schmidt RC, Zampieri FG, Ramos FJDS, Serra FSC, Damiani LP, Freitas FGR, Machado FR. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing PROpofol versus KetaMINE in rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients (PROMINE): protocol paper and statistical analysis plan. Crit Care Sci. 2025 Nov 17;37:e20250133. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250133. eCollection 2025.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PROMINE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Failure
-
NCT04079829UnknownShock | Shock, Septic | Respiratory Failure | Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Shock, Cardiogenic | Acute Cardiac Failure | Acute Respiratory Failure | Acute Kidney Failure | Multi Organ Failure | Respiratory Arrest
-
NCT07532811RecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure
-
NCT07279831RecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure
-
NCT07168213RecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure | Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure | High Flow Oxygen Therapy | Oxygen Delivery
-
NCT07638293Recruiting
-
NCT07379242RecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure (ARF)
-
NCT07265882RecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure (ARF)
-
NCT07247318Not yet recruitingAcute Respiratory Failure (ARF)
-
NCT07371026Not yet recruitingPediatric | Pediatric Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure
-
NCT04568642CompletedAcute Respiratory Failure | Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure | Acute Hypoxemic and Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Clinical Trials on Propofol
-
NCT07463911Active, not recruitingMajor Depression | Bipolar Affective Disorder | Bipolar Depression Depressed Phase
-
NCT07190729CompletedOocyte Retrieval | Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP)
-
NCT07305857Not yet recruitingEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection | Respiratory Complications | Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol | Endoscopy Unit
-
NCT07239687RecruitingSedation | Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol | Intensive Care Unit Sedation
-
NCT07198711Enrolling by invitationHealthy Volunteers
-
NCT07569016RecruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Deep Sedation | Electric Countershock
-
NCT01826149CompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Valvular Heart Disease
-
NCT02067936CompletedAnesthesia | Hemodynamic Instability | Interaction | Disorder of Oxygen Transport
-
NCT07534956RecruitingPediatric Anesthesia | Postoperative Agitations in Pediatric Patients | Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) | Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia