Evaluation of an eHealth System to Reduce Depression and Increase Resilience After SCI (SCIRP)

December 3, 2024 updated by: David Tulsky, University of Delaware

Initial Evaluation of an eHealth Self-Management System to Reduce Depression and Increase Resilience After SCI (SCIRP Pilot Clinical Trial)

The availability of symptom monitoring and self-management (SMSM) interventions is especially important for civilians and military populations with spinal cord injuries (SCI). High rates of depressive disorders (20-40%) and anxiety disorders (20-25%) have been found in both civilian and military populations and are significant contributors to both quality of life and well-being after SCI. Previous self-management interventions targeting physical activity and self-reliance in individuals with SCI have demonstrated significant health and lifestyle benefits. However, it has been shown that the injured individual's psychological outlook and mood can either enable or hinder self-management efforts and that currently available SCI-specific self-management programs may be inadequate. Developing interventions to reduce mental health symptoms following SCI is therefore critical to improve the lives of individuals, alleviate resource strain on military and civilian health care systems, and potentially reduce the rate of mortality by suicide in Veterans and civilians living with SCI. The current study will build on prior work developing an intervention platform to assess the effectiveness of this eHealth SMSM system and will test the feasibility and effectiveness of the intervention platform.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19716
        • University of Delaware College of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Access to the internet and an internet-enabled device
  • Diagnosis of a sudden-onset (i.e. not due to a degenerative disease such as ALS or MS) SCI (either traumatic or non-traumatic)
  • Discharged from initial inpatient rehabilitation and living in the community for at least 3 months
  • Age 18 or older at the time of enrollment
  • Age at least 16 years at the time of their spinal cord injury
  • Current symptoms (no more than two weeks from the time of consent) of at least mild depression and/or anxiety, as determined by a score of ≥5 on the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) and/or seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder measure (GAD-7).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female participants younger than 18 years old
  • A lack of English proficiency needed to comprehend and complete study measures and review online study content.
  • Current cognitive impairment that would limit comprehension of informed consent or study procedures, as determined by the member of the study team conducting informed consent.
  • Lack of access to the internet and an internet-enabled computer or smart device.
  • A spinal cord injury that is due to a degenerative disease (e.g. ALS, MS) and not sudden onset.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: eHeatlh Intervention Arm
The intervention platform is an interactive, web-based self-management program comprised of computer-adaptive tests (CATs) to assess depression, anxiety, and resilience and multimedia-assisted components. Participants will access the system once a week for 6 weeks, complete the symptom monitoring CATs, receive score reports, and watch a system-assigned self-management strategy video (which is selected by the system based on the participant's current level of depression/anxiety symptoms).
Other: eHealth Intervention
The intervention platform is interactive, and uses multimedia-assisted components. The system uses three SCI-QOL computer-adaptive tests (CATs) to assess depression, anxiety, and resilience; cut scores are used to tailor multi-media content that specifically addresses users' emotional health concerns.
Active Comparator: Active Control Arm
The active control condition is a static web-based program which also includes computer-adaptive tests (CATs) to assess depression, anxiety, and resilience, but does not provide score reports and plays a predetermined educational video (related to health promotion after SCI) each week. Participants will access the system once a week for 6 weeks, complete the symptom monitoring CATs and watch the educational video.
Other: Active Control Condition
The active control condition is a static site that displays symptom assessments followed by one educational video each week. These videos, which play in a predetermined order, provide education about managing physical health in individuals with SCI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in weekly depression symptoms as measured by the Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) Depression computer adaptive test (CAT)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-6
Patient-reported outcome measure of current depressive symptoms which is included in the intervention and control conditions each week.
Weeks 1-6
Change in weekly anxiety symptoms as measured by the Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) Anxiety computer adaptive test (CAT)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-6
Patient-reported outcome measure of current anxiety symptoms which is included in the intervention and control conditions each week.
Weeks 1-6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Current Depressive Symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Week 6. Also used for screening.
Patient-reported measure of depression
Change from Baseline to Week 6. Also used for screening.
Change in Current Symptoms of anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Week 6. Also used for screening.
Patient-reported measure of depression
Change from Baseline to Week 6. Also used for screening.
Change in weekly resilience levels as measured by the Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) resilience computer adaptive test (CAT)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-6
Patient-reported outcome measure of current resilience which is included in the intervention and control conditions each week.
Weeks 1-6

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative information on the usability of the system as measured by a System Usability Survey
Time Frame: At the end of the final (6th) system session. Each system session is open for 4 days or until the participant completes the session, whichever comes first.
Participants will complete a usability survey following the final session to provide information on the usability of the system.
At the end of the final (6th) system session. Each system session is open for 4 days or until the participant completes the session, whichever comes first.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Delaware

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Kessler Foundation
Department of Veterans Affairs, New Jersey

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 24, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 3, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1564112
  • W81XWH-20-1-0786 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defense)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings