Non-inferiority of Reduced-dose Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Low Disease Activity and Remission (REDOREM)

November 2, 2021 updated by: Dr. Peter Mandl, Medical University of Vienna

Randomized, Prospective, Active-comparator Controlled, Patient-blinded Study to Demonstrate Non-inferiority of Reduced-dose Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Low Disease Activity and Remission - the REDOREM Study

To investigate whether a reduced-dose dosing regimen (1x500mg semiannually) of rituximab (RTX) (Mabthera®) is non-inferior in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose disease is in persistent low disease activity (LDA) or clinical remission (REM) (pLDA/pREM) as compared to the standard dosing regimen of 1x1000mg semi-annual infusions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Randomized, controlled, single-centre study with 1x500mg or 1x1000 semi-annual infusions of RTX (Mabthera) as intervention and a follow-up period of 2 years. Patients as well as assessors will be blinded to the type of treatment. Patients in the 1x500mg group who experience a flare as defined by the disease activity score 28-ESR (DAS28) will receive 1x1000mg RTX (Mabthera) at their upcoming scheduled infusion appointment. Patients in the 1x1000mg group whose disease activity reaches DAS28 >3.2 during the duration of the study will be re-evaluated for a change in biological therapy and will discontinue the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Austria
      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University of Vienna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) / European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria
  • Current treatment with RTX (at time of inclusion have already received at least 2 cycles of 1000mg RTX) at the Day-Clinic of the Division of Rheumatology of the Medical University of Vienna
  • Persistent low disease activity or clinical remission as defined below
  • Persistent clinical remission (pREM) will be defined as a simplified disease activity index (CDAI) (12) ≤2.8 measured at two time-points 6 months apart. The CDAI is calculated as follows: tender joint count (TJC) + swollen joint count (SJC) + patient's assessment of general health on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (GH) + evaluator's assessment of general health on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (EGH)
  • Persistent low disease activity (pLDA) will be defined as a CDAI ≤10 measured at two timepoints 6 months apart Patients who achieve REM at only either one of the two successive time-points will be considered as having pLDA with regard to the current trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≤ 18 yrs
  • Patients receiving RTX for a disease other than RA
  • Patients who fail to meet criteria for REM or LDA at either one of the two successive timepoints (i.e. having a disease activity >10 as measured by the clinical disease activity index, (CDAI))

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 500mg RTX Group
Patients in this group will receive 1x500mg (500mg RTX group) RTX (Mabthera) at baseline (time-point of their upcoming semi-annual infusion) and at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Drug: 500mg RTX Group
Patients will receive 1x500mg RTX (Mabthera) at baseline (time-point of their upcoming semi-annual infusion) and at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Other Names:
  • Mabthera 500mg
Active Comparator: 1000mg RTX group
Patients in this group will receive 1x1000mg RTX (Mabthera) at baseline (time-point of their upcoming semi-annual infusion) and at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Drug: 1000mg RTX Group
Patients will receive 1x1000mg RTX (Mabthera) at baseline (time-point of their upcoming semi-annual infusion) and at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Other Names:
  • Mabthera 1000mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of flare
Time Frame: month 24
Disease activity score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation sate (DAS28-ESR), Scale 0 (best) - 10 (worse)
month 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic progression
Time Frame: month 12
Sharp modified van der Heijde (SvdH) score, Scale 0 (best) - 488 (worse)
month 12
Radiographic progression
Time Frame: month 24
Sharp modified van der Heijde (SvdH) score, Scale 0 (best) - 488 (worse)
month 24
Physical function
Time Frame: months 12
Health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), Scale 0 (best) - 3.0 worse
months 12
Physical function
Time Frame: months 24
Health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), Scale 0 (best) - 3.0 worse
months 24
Proportion of flare
Time Frame: month 21
Disease activity score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation sate (DAS28-ESR), Scale 0 (best) - 10 (worse)
month 21
Proportion of flare
Time Frame: month 18
Disease activity score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation sate (DAS28-ESR), Scale 0 (best) - 10 (worse)
month 18
Proportion of flare
Time Frame: month 15
Disease activity score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation sate (DAS28-ESR), Scale 0 (best) - 10 (worse)
month 15
Proportion of flare
Time Frame: month 12
Disease activity score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation sate (DAS28-ESR), Scale 0 (best) - 10 (worse)
month 12
Proportion of flare
Time Frame: month 9
Disease activity score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation sate (DAS28-ESR), Scale 0 (best) - 10 (worse)
month 9
Proportion of flare
Time Frame: month 6
Disease activity score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation sate (DAS28-ESR), Scale 0 (best) - 10 (worse)
month 6
Proportion of flare
Time Frame: month 3
Disease activity score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation sate (DAS28-ESR), Scale 0 (best) - 10 (worse)
month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of Vienna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015-002156-27

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings