Optimized Peak VO2 in Predicting Advanced HF

August 28, 2023 updated by: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Optimizing Risk Stratification in Predicting Poor Prognosis in Post-Acute Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

The ability and timely selection of severe heart failure (HF) patients for cardiac transplantation and advanced HF therapy is challenging. Peak VO2 by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was used for transplant listing. This study aimed to reassess the prognostic significance of peak VO2 and to compare that with the Heart Failure Survival Score in the current optimized novel guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Investigators retrospectively collected acute HF patients discharged alive from the hospital. Investigators divided participants into more-GDMT (≥2 kinds) and few-GDMT (<2 kinds) groups and compared the prognostic significance of peak VO2 and HFSS for combined all-cause mortality and urgent cardiac transplantation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
377

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 83341
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Heart Failure Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Investigators retrospectively collected acute HF patients discharged alive from the hospital. Investigators divided participants into more-GDMT (>= 2 kinds) and few-GDMT (<2 kinds) groups and compared the prognostic significance of peak VO2 and Heart Failure Survival Score for combined all-cause mortality and urgent cardiac transplantation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acute HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF <=40%) and discharged alive from the hospital
  • patients with age >= 20 years of age
  • patients who performed cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) within one month after discharge
  • patients with serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level >100 pg/mL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with estimated survival time < 6 months
  • patients who could not tolerate exercise test due to muscular-skeletal disorder or other reason
  • patients who had severe valvular heart disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
More-GDMT
Baseline guideline-directed medications therapy (GDMT), including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) were documented at discharge. More-GDMT group was defined as patient population received GDMT >=2 kinds of above medications.
Diagnostic test: cardiopulmonary exercise test
CPET was performed in this HF cohort within one month after being discharged and interpreted as previously described. Patients underwent an upright graded cycle ergometer exercise using a personalized ramp protocol or a motorized treadmill using a modified Bruce or Cornell protocol. Peak VO2 data measured by cycle ergometer were increased by 10% to allow a comparison between the two different procedures. Peak VO2 was defined as the highest 30-second average value obtained during exercise. Submaximal CPET variables such as ventilatory efficiency were calculated by the slope of VE versus VCO2 below the ventilatory compensatory point (VCP). If the slope of VE/VCO2 can't be calculated, we used the nadir of VE/VCO2, or the ratio of VE/VCO2 at the anaerobic threshold (AT) as the variable of ventilatory efficiency. The AT was determined by the V-slope method.
Few-GDMT group
Baseline guideline-directed medications therapy (GDMT), including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) were documented at discharge. Few GDMT-group was defined as patients who received GDMT < 2 kinds of the above medications.
Diagnostic test: cardiopulmonary exercise test
CPET was performed in this HF cohort within one month after being discharged and interpreted as previously described. Patients underwent an upright graded cycle ergometer exercise using a personalized ramp protocol or a motorized treadmill using a modified Bruce or Cornell protocol. Peak VO2 data measured by cycle ergometer were increased by 10% to allow a comparison between the two different procedures. Peak VO2 was defined as the highest 30-second average value obtained during exercise. Submaximal CPET variables such as ventilatory efficiency were calculated by the slope of VE versus VCO2 below the ventilatory compensatory point (VCP). If the slope of VE/VCO2 can't be calculated, we used the nadir of VE/VCO2, or the ratio of VE/VCO2 at the anaerobic threshold (AT) as the variable of ventilatory efficiency. The AT was determined by the V-slope method.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: May, 2014 ~ June 2020
Number of participants that had occurrence of the mortality which is defined as all-cause mortality
May, 2014 ~ June 2020
urgent heart transplant
Time Frame: May, 2014 ~ June 2020
Number of participants that had occurrence of the urgent heart transplant
May, 2014 ~ June 2020

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shyh-Ming Chen, MD, Chang Gung Medical Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 202001285B0D001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data sharing plans will be discussed with other investigators

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings